Cases from cite.case.law:

MESNIKOFF, v. FQ BACKYARD TRADING, LLC,, 239 So. 3d 765 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Although we agree that Backyard Trading is a "landlord" under the Act, § 83.43(3), Fla. . . . See § 83.43(4), Florida Statutes (2016) (defining "tenant" as "any person entitled to occupy a dwelling . . .

BORJAS, v. VERGARA,, 232 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . the county court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, that there was no rental agreement under section 83.43 . . . “Section 83.43(4), Florida Statutes (2004), defines ‘tenant’ as ‘any person entitled to occupy a dwelling . . . “Moreover, section 83.43(7) defines ‘rental agreement’ as ‘any written agreement, or oral agreement if . . .

WOLF, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . based on what trial counsel referenced as the “relevant portions” of sections 83.46, 83.56, 83.57, and 83.43 . . .

ATLANTIS ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC. v. DePIERRO, 125 So. 3d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . matter, the court ruled that the $66,000 rental payment was advance rent, within the meaning of section 83.43 . . . See § 83.43(9), Fla. . . .

In H. PENARAN,, 424 B.R. 868 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2010)

. . . his plan on June 24, 2009 to provide for 60 monthly payments, the first 26 payments in the amount of $83.43 . . . Debtor proposes to pay the sum of $83.43 for 26 months and $34.43 for 34 months. . Dkt. 21. . . . .

TOLEDO, v. ESCAMILLA,, 962 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 83.43(4), Florida Statutes (2004), defines “tenant” as “any person entitled to occupy a dwelling . . . Moreover, section 83.43(7) defines “rental agreement” as “any written agreement, or oral agreement if . . . Toledo and her former boyfriend cannot be considered a “rental agreement” as defined in section 83.43 . . . a landlord-tenant relationship with a ‘rental agreement’ as required by Florida Statutes §§ 83.41, 83.43 . . . (6) & 83.43(7) (2004).... . . .

PETIT v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a, 352 F.3d 1111 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . 82.82; the unstandardized score of the 30th Hispanic candidate was 80.95 and the standardized score was 83.43 . . .

PETIT, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a, 239 F. Supp. 2d 761 (N.D. Ill. 2002)

. . . top 500 had a racially un standardized score of 80.95 (rank 774) and a racially standardized score of 83.43 . . .

PETIT, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 31 F. Supp. 2d 604 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . top 500 had a racially un standardized score of 80.95 (rank 774) and a racially standardized score of 83.43 . . .

COFIELD v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA W., 969 F. Supp. 749 (N.D. Ga. 1997)

. . . Aug. 1990 83.43 8.45 .963 18.36 Von Epps State Rep. 1992 78.08 20.85 .931 6.37 Jackson President 1988 . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 310 100.00% 24 7.74% 284 91.61% 2 0.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Total Lawrence County 26,499 100.00% 22,107 83.43% . . .

PALAWSKI v. DULEY,, 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 207 (Manatee Cty. Ct. 1991)

. . . designated as rent in a written agreement, do not constitute rent as defined in Florida Statutes § 83.43 . . . unless designated as rent in a written agreement, do not constitute rent as defined in Florida Statute § 83.43 . . .

WHEELER v. BLUE LANTERN, INC., 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 158 (Lee Cty. Ct. 1991)

. . . Defendant, and after review of Florida Statutes 509.013(4)(b)l; 509.013(8); 509.141(1); 509.039 and 83.41; 83.43 . . .

FLAGSHIP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. v. MANNINGS, 46 Fla. Supp. 2d 136 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1990)

. . . the amount of “rent” due under Florida Law and therefore fails to substantially comply with Sections 83.43 . . .

METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY OF UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, v. CALVANESE BUILDING CORP., 735 F. Supp. 167 (E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . Interest on said unpaid contributions amounts to $83.43. 7. . . . 16, Section 1(c) of the IFCA Agreement, defendant is liable for $286.71 in liquidated damages and $83.43 . . .

In L. NORTON, L. L. SULLIVAN, v. L. NORTON, L., 112 B.R. 932 (C.D. Ill. 1990)

. . . her one-half of that crop’s proceeds, or $12.01; the total administrative claim was calculated to be $83.43 . . .

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH v. SMITH, 27 Fla. Supp. 2d 30 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1987)

. . . However, Section 83.43(6) Florida Statutes defines rent as: “Rent means the periodic payments due the . . .

MARES v. CREDIT BUREAU OF RATON,, 801 F.2d 1197 (10th Cir. 1986)

. . . . $97.90 for ‘copying’ and $83.43 for long distance telephone. . . . The court took, without explanation, the amount of $83.43 allowed for long distance telephone costs from . . . Telephone Calls 83.43 TOTAL $15,463.81 To Mr. . . .

PATERSON, v. C. DEEB, Co. W. Co., 472 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . The term "dwelling unit” is defined in section 83.43(2) to mean a structure or part of a structure that . . .

In WYATT, v. MELLON MORTGAGE, INC. EAST W., 36 B.R. 783 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . the water meter reinstalled, $29.54 to repair the air conditioners, $38.16 to change the locks, and $83.43 . . .

CUNNING v. GRIFFIN, 3 Fla. Supp. 2d 127 (Lake Cty. Ct. 1983)

. . . specifically applies to a dwelling unit which is furnished as an incident of employment, and Section 83.43 . . .

BARCELONA WEST v. ELLIS, 4 Fla. Supp. 2d 71 (Orange Cty. Ct. 1983)

. . . Plaintiff correctly points out that pursuant to Florida Statute 83.43(6), late charges could be considered . . . Florida Statute 83.43(6): “rent” means the periodic payments due the landlord from the tenant for occupancy . . .

STATE v. DE ANZA CORPORATION, d b a De, 416 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . “good faith” is defined in section 671.201(19), Florida Statutes (1981), identically as in section 83.43 . . .

HOCHE v. BERRY, 5 Fla. Supp. 2d 110 (Orange Cty. Ct. 1981)

. . . rent in a written agreement, do not constitute rent under the definition of Florida Statutes Section 83.43 . . .

SOLOMON, d b a v. GENTRY, 388 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . thereby precluding application of the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Section 83.42(3) and 83.43 . . .

N. NELSON, v. O. E. SERWOLD N. NELSON, v. O. E. SERWOLD, 576 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1978)

. . . The court awarded $3,003.48 ($83.43 per share) plus interest and costs. . . .

A. L. MULLINS, Jr. v. NOLAND COMPANY, 406 F. Supp. 206 (N.D. Ga. 1975)

. . . Here’s another one billed on October 15th covering some GE equipment for $83.43. . . .

CHRISTIERNIN L. v. E. MANNING,, 138 F. Supp. 923 (D.N.J. 1956)

. . . at his death his wife, Regina Scott-Hall Christiemin, if she survived him, would receive the sum of $83.43 . . .