The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 83.58

83.58 Remedies; tenant holding over.—If the tenant holds over and continues in possession of the dwelling unit or any part thereof after the expiration of the rental agreement without the permission of the landlord, the landlord may recover possession of the dwelling unit in the manner provided for in s. 83.59. The landlord may also recover double the amount of rent due on the dwelling unit, or any part thereof, for the period during which the tenant refuses to surrender possession.

History.—s. 2, ch. 73-330; s. 10, ch. 2013-136.

F.S. 83.58 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.58 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.58

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.58

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.58.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In GENERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. L. v. N. A., 399 B.R. 708 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . WAMU conceded that it retained the sum of $83.58 as its servicing fee in connection with the Wire Transfer . . .

In GENERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. L. v. F. A., 384 B.R. 617 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . The Defendant further contends that it retained the sum of $83.58 as its servicing fee in connection . . .

JONES, v. SCIENTIFIC COLORS, INC. d b a APOLLO COLORS, INC. v. d b a, 201 F. Supp. 2d 820 (N.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . investigators to communicate with Plaintiffs Thompson and George in violation of Local Rules 83.54 and 83.58 . . . Moreover, even assuming arguendo a Rule 83.54 (and/or Rule 83.58) violation(s) herein, the state of the . . .

THEODOROPOULOS v. TALBERT,, 666 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See §§ 83.58, 83.04, 83.05, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

MELI INVESTMENT CORP. v. O. R., 621 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Landlord brought suit against tenants as holdover tenants, § 83.58, Fla.Stat. (1991), seeking damages . . .

MEEK, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 805 F. Supp. 967 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . VAP % Non-Hispanic White VAP Non-Hispanic White VAP % 1960 642,598 25,786 4.01% 79,706 12.40% 537,106 83.58% . . .

A. CASAVAN, v. LAND O LAKES REALTY, INC. OF LEESBURG,, 542 So. 2d 371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . the theory that the Carharts are entitled to claim double rent pursuant to section 83.06 or section 83.58 . . . Nor do we think section 83.58 applies to this case. . . . and one-half month's retention of possession of the premises, pursuant to section 83.06 or section 83.58 . . .

D. MESALIC, v. SLAYTON,, 865 F.2d 46 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . Mesalic purchased 83.58 acres of land from the Township Council of Jefferson, New Jersey in the fall . . .

DYNALECTRON CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 659 F. Supp. 64 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . RCA 83.58 Tab 13B. These three technical reviewers also undertook a cost analysis. . . .

INVESTMENT INCOME REALTY, INC. v. BARKLEY, 9 Fla. Supp. 2d 51 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1985)

. . . are holding over your rent shall be doubled from its present amount as provided by Florida Statutes 83.58 . . . Amended Complaint for Tenant Eviction” which demands an award of double rent pursuant to Florida Statute 83.58 . . .

DELGADO, v. McTIGHE,, 522 F. Supp. 886 (E.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . 1973 bar examination 130 Multistate passed 105 Multistate — 50 Essay 85 Multistate — 65 Essay 268 224 83.58% . . .

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a v. FORTE TOWERS, INC. a, 305 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 1974)

. . . . §§ 83.46, 83.57, 83.58, and 83.59) and F.S. Ch. 731 (Florida Probate Law). . . .

COALITION FOR EDUCATION IN DISTRICT ONE v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 370 F. Supp. 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)

. . . PS 134 12-63 0-20% 84.38% unchanged 311 East Broadway 13 63 0-60% unchanged PS 140 18 63 40-60% 83.58% . . .

ROUTED THRU- PAC, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 185 Ct. Cl. 428 (Ct. Cl. 1968)

. . . Ross.. 24 36 83.58 6. DeConno... 21 32 42.60 6. Cockroft_ 19 26 122.72 7. Walters_ 28 65 50.00 8. . . .

F. DUNBAR v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 283 F. Supp. 823 (S.D. Ind. 1968)

. . . option are as follows: Policy Amount 1436301 $ 45.30 1439017 45.30 1439018 45.30 1439019 45.30 2104549 83.58 . . .

v., 30 T.C. 26 (T.C. 1958)

. . . Interest on note_ $939.12 160.00 228.00 88.99 939.12 160.00 225.00 Total.. 2,720.23 $939.12 150.00 222.00 83.58 . . .

NEW YORK TELEPHONE CO. v. PRENDERGAST CITY OF NEW YORK,, 36 F.2d 54 (S.D.N.Y. 1929)

. . . deducting therefrom 86.78 per cent, of the total expenditures for 1924; 83.91 per cent, for 1926; and 83.58 . . .