Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. ESPINOZA,, 264 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Espinoza earned a fee or profit of $ 83.67. . . .

DOUBLELINE CAPITAL LP, v. ODEBRECHT FINANCE, LTD. S. A. E o S. A. S. A., 323 F. Supp. 3d 393 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . Similarly, the 7.50% Notes increased in value from $80.50 on June 22, 2015 to $82.50 on June 23, 2015 and $83.67 . . .

GRANT, v. LLC, 65 So. 3d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . the immediate possession of a residential apartment, contending that the appellees violated section 83.67 . . .

In REVISIONS TO SIMPLIFIED FORMS PURSUANT TO RULE A OF RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 50 So. 3d 503 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Landlord is prohibited from taking certain actions as described in Section 83.67, Florida Statutes, the . . . Landlord is prohibited from taking certain actions as described in Section 83.67, Florida Statutes, the . . .

NYUNT, v. Y. TOMLINSON,, 543 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . Soe with a score of 83.67. Id. at 2. . . .

JACOBS, v. WESTGATE, 766 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . He initially sued for 1) wrongful eviction; 2) violation of section 83.67, Florida Statutes (1997); 3 . . .

CLEMENTE v. E. HORNE, 707 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . , the appellants sought statutory damages for breach of their landlords’ duties pursuant to section 83.67 . . .

In RALPH LAUREN WOMENSWEAR, INC., 204 B.R. 363 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Randy Shapiro from Stroock’s office billed Kreisler $83.67 for a cab ride home from the office when she . . .

MANN, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE,, 946 F. Supp. 962 (M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . addition, Judge Honeywell entered an order against the Creasys, for violation of Florida Statute § 83.67 . . .

BADARACO, v. SUNCOAST TOWERS V ASSOCIATES,, 676 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . According to the tenant, Section 83.67, Florida Statutes (1995), entitled him to damages in the amount . . . Section 83.67 prohibits a landlord from terminating or interrupting any utility service and specifically . . . Applying these principles, we conclude that the legislative history behind Section 83.67 supports the . . . (stating that section 83.67 would furnish "an economic incentive to the landlord to ... file an eviction . . . (stating that “ § 83.67, F.S., is created prohibiting landlords from engaging in coercive self-help practices . . .

JAMES, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA, L. St. D. St., 33 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . three Florida statutes as the source of her entitlement to continued water service: Fla.Stat. ehs. 83.67 . . . Section 83.67(1) prohibits a landlord from directly or indirectly causing the termination or interruption . . .

JAMES, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA, L. St. D. St., 6 F.3d 1457 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 83.67 prohibits a landlord from interrupting a tenant’s water service, directly or indirectly. . . . Fla.Stat. § 83.67 (1991) provides in pertinent part: (1) No landlord of any dwelling unit governed by . . . the landlord’s inability to use utility cutoff as constructive eviction was codified in Fla.Stat. § 83.67 . . .

WILSON v. BYRD, 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 214 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . Section 83.67(4), Fla. . . .

WHEELER v. BLUE LANTERN, INC., 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 158 (Lee Cty. Ct. 1991)

. . . Florida Statutes 509.013(4)(b)l; 509.013(8); 509.141(1); 509.039 and 83.41; 83.43(2)(b), (4), (10); 83.67 . . . This was done without compliance with Chapter 83, and Section 83.67(4) calls for treble damages for such . . . Court finds that the Defendant acted improperly in locking the Plaintiff out of the trailer (Section 83.67 . . . Multiplied by three (3), as set forth in 83.67(4), produces an amount of One Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-One . . .

TOWERS ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE v. RICHARDSON, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 79 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . of the County Court, awarding the Appellee tenant, Sterlette Richardson, damages pursuant to Section 83.67 . . . Section 83.67 prohibits certain practices by the landlord, one of which is the removal of a tenant’s . . . Richardson’s belongings thereby violating Section 83.67. Since Ms. . . . Tower Associates alleges that Section 83.67 constitutes an unlawful taking of its property without due . . . Accordingly, we find that Section 83.67 is constitutional and that the judgment below should be affirmed . . .

RUSSO v. MANFREDO, 35 Fla. Supp. 2d 23 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . . §§ 83.49-83.67 (1987). . . . Stat. §§ 83.40-83.67 (1987) governing residential tenancies. . . .

ROUTHIER v. MEILEY, 33 Fla. Supp. 2d 122 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Defendant is entitled to recover pursuant to Florida Statute under Section 83.67(4).” . . . The penalty provisions of Florida Statute 83.67(4) are mandatory and the trial judge is without discretion . . .

STATE OF OHIO, OHIO STUDENT LOAN COMMISSION, v. WILKINSON, In WINSTON, Jr., 24 B.R. 474 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . In addition, Plaintiff contends that Debtors’ payment of $75.00 out of $83.67 “disposable monthly income . . .

J. B. TAYLOR v. E. P. PERINI,, 477 F. Supp. 1289 (N.D. Ohio 1979)

. . . 15.00 48.75 23.53 76.47 19.02 3 Dormitory 29.50 33.75 46.64 53.36 4.09 3C Dormitory 10.25 52.50 16.33 83.67 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. HOWARD, a k a J. F., 254 F. Supp. 499 (D. Or. 1966)

. . . to its claim under the conveyance from the county, claims a sewer improvement assessment lien for $83.67 . . .

JOHN E. SMITH S SONS COMPANY, v. LATTIMER FOUNDRY MACHINE COMPANY,, 19 F.R.D. 379 (M.D. Pa. 1956)

. . . 1948 — 139.47 June 7, 1948 — 93.06 June 21, 1948 — 152.46 August 10, 1948 — 299.27 September 7, 1948 — 83.67 . . .

THE BAIRD MACHINE CO., 2 B.T.A. 1089 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . It owned outright 83.67 per cent of the voting stock of the Foundry Company and 63.4 per cent of the . . . secretary of the Machine Company, in the following amounts: The Baird Machine Co-:- 502 shares, or 83.67 . . .