Cases from cite.case.law:

LAMANCUSA, III, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O B O LAMANCUSA,, 250 So. 3d 812 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 1738B(d) (2012) ; § 88.2051, Fla. Stat. (2013) ; Trissler , 987 So.2d at 210. . . . . § 1738B(d) ; § 88.2051(1), Fla. Stat.; Trissler , 987 So.2d at 210. . . . Trissler , 987 So.2d at 210 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1738B(e)(2)(A), (B) ; § 88.2051, Fla. Stat.). . . .

IVKO, v. GER,, 233 So. 3d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 88.2051(l)(a) mandates that a tribunal that has issued a child support order retains continuing . . . remains the residence of the child for whose benefit the support order was issued or, pursuant to section 88.2051 . . . , may modify the Florida child support order and assume continuing jurisdiction pursuant to section 88.2051 . . . relief for violations of that order which occurred before the effective date of the modification. § 88.2051 . . .

PULKKINEN, v. PULKKINEN, n k a, 127 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 88.6111(l)(b), 88.6131(1), 88.2051(2). . . .

SOOTIN, v. SOOTIN,, 41 So. 3d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 88.2051(6) (emphasis added). . . .

H. TRISSLER, Jr. v. TRISSLER,, 987 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 1738B(d); § 88.2051(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . See 28 U.S.C. § 1738B(e)(2)(A) & (B); § 88.2051, Fla. Stat. (2007); see also Gropper v. . . . modify the order and assume continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the order. .Specifically, section 88.2051 . . . (1), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: 88.2051. . . .

BOUQUETY, v. BOUQUETY,, 933 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . DISCUSSION Our resolution of this case requires us to construe section 88.2051 of the Uniform Interstate . . . modification of a child support order issued by a court located in a foreign country is governed by sections 88.2051 . . . § 88.2051(2)-(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . See § 88.2051(3), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

MANI, v. J. MANI,, 927 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 88.2051(6), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

STROMMEN, v. B. STROMMEN n k a, 927 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See also § 88.2051, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

SPALDING, v. SPALDING,, 907 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 88.2051(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

SPALDING, v. SPALDING,, 886 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . “Continuing exclusive jurisdiction,” a defined term under UIFSA, is described in section 88.2051, Florida . . . Sections 88.2051, 88.2061(3) and 88.6031, Florida Statutes (2003), three of the provisions of UIFSA implicated . . . See § 88.2051(l)(a) and (b), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . governing the procedures to be followed in the modification of child support orders are found in section 88.2051 . . . See § 88.2051(6), Fla. Stat. (2003); see also Vinnik v. Vinnik, 831 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). . . .

HOUSTON v. A. MAGLIO,, 845 So. 2d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Stat. (2002); § 88.2051(4), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . . §§ 88.2051(l)(a) 88.2071(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

B. VINNIK, v. M. VINNIK B., 831 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 88.2051(6), Fla. Stat. (2001); § 580-205(f), N.Y. Family Court Laws (2001). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CASCELLA, v. CASCELLA,, 751 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 88.2051 of Florida’s UIFSA defines continuing exclusive jurisdiction as: (1) A tribunal of this . . .

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE E. SLOAN, v. E. SLOAN,, 743 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 88.2051, Florida Statutes, part of the UIFSA, provides in relevant part: (1) A tribunal of this . . .

L. URSO, v. I. URSO,, 724 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 88.2051(l)-(4), Fla. . . .