Cases from cite.case.law:

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 163 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2015)

. . . APPENDIX 3.8(b) CONVICTIQN-Q-E CERTAIN CRIMES AS IMPEACHMENT §§ 90.107, 90.610(1), Fla.Stat.- To be given . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 157 So. 3d 1027 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Comment This instruction was adopted in 2015. 2.5 CONVICTION OF CERTAIN CRIMES AS IMPEACHMENT §§ 90.107 . . .

EUGENE, v. STATE, 53 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

WOODALL, v. STATE, 39 So. 3d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Smith, 573 So.2d 306, 316 (Fla.1990) (“Section 90.107 of the Florida Statutes (1987) provides: When evidence . . .

GRIFFIN, v. ELLIS ALUMINUM SCREEN, INC., 30 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . .” § 90.107 (emphasis added). . . . relevant to any of the claims against Ellis, it could properly be admitted under sections 90.403 and 90.107 . . .

J. WRIGHT, v. STATE, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009)

. . . See id. at 813 (citing § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (1995)); see also Parsons v. . . .

SALEEBY, v. ROCKY ELSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009)

. . . See § 90.107, Fla. . . .

McDUFFIE, v. STATE, 970 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2005); Consalvo v. State, 697 So.2d 805, 813 (Fla.1996). . . .

HOSKINS, v. STATE, 965 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2007)

. . . .” § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2004). Hoskins failed to preserve this argument. . . . Similarly, here, defense counsel did not raise section 90.107 in the trial court. . . .

L. JOHNSON, v. STATE, 747 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . pursuant to Florida Standard Jury Instruction 3.10: CONVICTION OF CERTAIN CRIMES AS IMPEACHMENT (NEW) F.S. 90.107 . . .

LOPEZ, v. STATE, 716 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . “[Sjecticm 90.107, Florida Statutes, provides that where evidence is properly admitted for a limited . . . See § 90.107(1), Fla. Stat.; 1 Barbara E. . . .

A. CONSALVO, v. STATE, 697 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1996)

. . . Under section 90.107, Florida Statutes (1995), evidence that is admissible for one purpose may be inadmissible . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 657 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1995)

. . . committee recommends a new instruction on “Conviction Of Certain Crimes As Impeachment,” based on sections 90.107 . . . APPENDIX CONVICTION OF CERTAIN CRIMES AS IMPEACHMENT (NEW) F.S. 90.107, 90.610(1) Note to Judge: To be . . .

VARNADORE, v. STATE, 626 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Contrary to the explicit mandate of section 90.107, Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court declined . . . appellant’s robbery conviction despite some reservations as to the proper enforceability of section 90.107 . . . GRIFFIN, J., concurs in result only, without opinion. .Section 90.107 provides: Limited Admissibility . . .

McFALL v. INVERRARY COUNTRY CLUB, INC., 622 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Under section 90.107, Florida Statutes (1991), evidence that is admissible to show one discrete issue . . .

LIGHTFOOT, v. STATE, 591 So. 2d 305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . In a related vein, section 90.107, Florida Statutes, provides that where evidence is properly admitted . . . concerning prior felony convictions was appropriate for a limiting instruction pursuant to section 90.107 . . .

STATE v. SMITH,, 573 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Section 90.107 of the Florida Statutes (1987) provides: When evidence that is admissible as to one party . . . However, because Smith did not make contemporaneous requests for instructions pursuant to section 90.107 . . .

DUNMORE, Sr. Jr. v. EAGLE MOTOR LINES F- B, 560 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 90.107, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

McCRAE, v. STATE, 549 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . recognizes that evidence inadmissible for one purpose may, however, be admissible for another, Section 90.107 . . .

KINGERY, v. STATE, 523 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 90.107, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . .” § 90.107, Fla.Stat. (1985); Mazzara v. State, 437 So.2d at 719. . . .

STATE v. PALMORE,, 510 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 107.1 (2d ed. 1984); see § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

E. PARSONS G. v. MOTOR HOMES OF AMERICA, INC., 465 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 90.107, Fla.Stat. (1981). See also: Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.450(b); Fla.Std.Jury Instr. (Civ.) 2.4. . . . Id. 224. . § 90.107, Fla.Stat. (1981) provides: When evidence that is admissible as to one party or for . . .

MAZZARA, v. STATE, 437 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 90.107, Florida Statutes (1981). . . . It is apparent, however, from those cases and from the provisions of Section 90.107 that a party must . . .

J. HODGES, v. STATE, 403 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See §§ 90.107 and 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .