Cases from cite.case.law:

NOCK, v. STATE, 256 So. 3d 828 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 90.108, Fla. Stat. Ann. (2011) (Law Revision Council Note). . . . Of course, that is not how section 90.108(1) operates. . . . (quoting § 90.108, Fla. Stat.) ). . . . Nock's argument runs up against the text of section 90.108(1). . . . See § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

W. TUNDIDOR, v. STATE, 221 So. 3d 587 (Fla. 2017)

. . . State, 676 So.2d 394, 402 (Fla. 1996) (quoting § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1991)); see also Eberhardt v. . . . Here, Anna’s deposition was admissible under section 90.108. . . .

CARTER, v. STATE, 226 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . to distinguish a recent Florida Supreme Court case and to further discuss the application of section 90.108 . . . Under the section 90.108(1) rule of completeness, “once a party ‘opens the door’ by introducing part . . . “Fairness is clearly the focus” of section 90.108(1). Jordan v. . . . Because it is not limited to different parts of the same conversation or writing, section 90.108(1) is . . . We noted in our original opinion that section 90.108 has never been given the broad application urged . . . Appellant sought to admit his prior statements under the rule of completeness, codified at section 90.108 . . . Appellant focuses on the plain language of section 90.108(1), which allows not just omitted parts of . . . Using the language of section 90.108(1), “fairness” does not require turning a trial into a voyage on . . . The third district held that section 90.108 allowed the defendant to question the . . . . Johnson is consistent with cases applying section 90.108(1) to require, admission of the portion of a . . .

S. SCHWARTZBERG, v. STATE, 215 So. 3d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (2015), provides: When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof . . . admission of any part of a statement “that in fairness ought to be considered contemporaneously.” § 90.108 . . .

NOCK, v. STATE, 211 So. 3d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). . . .

CALLOWAY, v. STATE, 210 So. 3d 1160 (Fla. 2017)

. . . (citing § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. (2007)); Reese v. . . . Neither section 90.803 nor section 90.108 has been substantially altered since 1997, the year of these . . .

NEWTON, v. STATE, 160 So. 3d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 90.108(1), Fla. . . . .” § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, v. R. SMITH, 159 So. 3d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See, e.g., § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

JOHNROE, v. STATE, 152 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Also, the rule of completeness as set forth in section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (2012), requires that . . .

CAVALIERE, v. STATE, 147 So. 3d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . problematic in this case where only the prejudicial clip was shown, the rule of completeness, see § 90.108 . . .

PIERCE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 137 So. 3d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 90.108(1) (“When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse . . .

CALHOUN, v. STATE, 138 So. 3d 349 (Fla. 2013)

. . . However, section 90.108 provides: (1) When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced . . . An adverse party is not bound by evidence introduced under this section. § 90.108(1), Fla. . . .

LOUREIRO, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (2001). . . . .

ROBINSON, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., 103 So. 3d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 90.108(1), Fla. . . .

KACZMAR, III, v. STATE Of, 104 So. 3d 990 (Fla. 2012)

. . . However, section 90.108 provides: (1) When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced . . . An adverse party is not bound by evidence introduced under this section. § 90.108(1), Fla. . . .

SWEARINGEN, v. STATE, 91 So. 3d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . On remand, we remind the parties that, pursuant to the rule of completeness set forth in section 90.108 . . . Although section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (2011), speaks in terms of written or recorded statements . . .

HARDEN, v. STATE, 87 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The rule of completeness is codified in section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (2009), which provides that . . .

METZ, v. STATE, 59 So. 3d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Metz argued that his entire statement was admissible under the rule of completeness, subsection 90.108 . . . Metz’s statement to the deputy because that portion of the statement was admissible under subsection 90.108 . . . .2d 568, 580 (Fla.1999), the Supreme Court described the operation of this rule: Codified at section 90.108 . . . The subsection 90.108(1) rule of completeness has been applied where excluded portions of a defendant . . . State, 693 So.2d 644, 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), we held that subsection 90.108(1) required admission of . . .

SHAW, v. STATE, 43 So. 3d 149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. (2009); Jackson v. State, 2 So.3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). . . .

PULCINI, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The rule is codified in section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes, which provides in pertinent part: When a . . .

DUBON, v. STATE, 982 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . exclusion from evidence of the remainder of his custodial statement under the rule of completeness (section 90.108 . . .

SCHREIBER, v. STATE, 973 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . completeness,” or “rule of completeness,” to which the trial court was referring is apparently that of section 90.108 . . . State, 676 So.2d 394, 401 (Fla.1996) (noting that section 90.108 is known as the “rule of completeness . . . introduction of the probation testimony did nothing to enhance fairness, as contemplated by section 90.108 . . .

DESSETT, v. STATE, 951 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . The rule of completeness is codified in section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes, which provides in pertinent . . .

MOORE, v. STATE, 943 So. 2d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

TROY, v. STATE, 948 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2006)

. . . However, while such a ruling appears to be an appropriate discretionary one under section 90.108(1) of . . .

M. FERNANDEZ, v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION,, 937 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). See generally Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 108.1. . . .

WHITFIELD, v. STATE, 933 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . However, the rule of completeness, which is codified in section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (2004), provides . . .

RALEIGH, v. STATE v. R., 932 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2006)

. . . See § 90.108(1), Fla. . . .

L. MORRISON, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . statement if the opposing party “opens the door” by referring to portions of it during its case); § 90.108 . . .

BARONE, v. STATE, 841 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . .” § 90.108(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

STATE v. LENA,, 819 So. 2d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . We first reject the State’s contention that this statement is admissible under section 90.108, Florida . . . See § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

H. EVANS, v. STATE, 808 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2001)

. . . introduction of the partial statements.’ ” Id. at 398 (quoting Larzelere, 676 So.2d at 402); see § 90.108 . . .

MILLER, v. STATE, 780 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The “rule of completeness” is codified in section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1987), and provides that . . .

E. DORFMAN, M. D. v. SCHWABL, 777 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See section 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

SHANNON, v. STATE, 753 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1999) only mandates the introduction of that which in fairness ought . . .

GUTIERREZ v. STATE, 747 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1997), also known as the rule of completeness, states, (1) When a writing . . . An adverse party is not bound by evidence introduced under this section. § 90.108(1), Fla. . . . State, 700 So.2d 5, 8-9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (explaining that counsel may not seek to invoke section 90.108 . . . The only time he could have made any argument for admission of his tape under section 90.108 was during . . .

RAMIREZ, v. STATE, 739 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1999)

. . . Codified at section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1995), the rule of completeness provides that “[w]hen a . . .

LAYMAN, III, v. STATE, 728 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that when a party introduces a portion of a recorded . . . Accordingly, under section 90.108(1), it was error for the trial court to prevent the defendant from . . .

MASON, v. STATE, 719 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Appellant relies on § 90.108(1), Florida Statutes (1997) which provides in part: When a writing or recorded . . .

HOFFMAN, v. STATE, 708 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Appellant incorrectly asserts that the “rule of completeness” recognized in section 90.108, Florida Statutes . . . Section 90.108 states that "when a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party . . .

MENDOZA, v. STATE, 700 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1997)

. . . . § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . Under the circumstances, the prior statement was admissible under section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1991 . . .

FRANQUI, v. STATE, 699 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 1997)

. . . See § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Richardson v. . . .

VAZQUEZ, v. STATE, 700 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . It has thus been noted that: “If counsel for the adverse party does not seek to invoke section 90.108 . . . However, section 90.108 does not prohibit evidence of the remainder of the writing or document; the evidence . . .

SWEET, v. STATE, 693 So. 2d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . However, the “rule of completeness” recognized in section 90.108, Florida Statutes, provides: When a . . .

JORDAN, v. STATE, 694 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Jordan argues that section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1991), dictates that the trial judge erred in refusing . . .

REESE, v. STATE, 694 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Although that rule is defined at section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1995), to include only written or . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 689 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Under the “rule of completeness,” § 90.108(1), Fla. . . . Id. at 402 (quoting § 90.108(1)). . . .

LARZELERE, v. STATE, 676 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 1996)

. . . to the introduction of this evidence and requested, under the “doctrine of completeness” and section 90.108 . . . The appellant argues that a showing of prejudice is not required, that section 90.108 allows an adverse . . . Section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1991), provides in pertinent part: When a writing or recorded statement . . . State, 416 So.2d 1199, 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (section 90.108 gives parties “only a qualified right . . . fairness ought to be considered contemporaneously” with the introduction of the partial statement. § 90.108 . . .

CHAO, v. STATE, 661 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Chao argues this was reversible error, citing section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1993) and Long v. . . . Long is clear that under section 90.108, a party, in the interest of fairness, has the option to introduce . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 653 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

LONG, v. STATE, 610 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 1992)

. . . This concept is expressly set forth in section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1987), which provides in part . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 608 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1992)

. . . The rule of completeness is codified as section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1987), and applies to writings . . . “Although the language of section 90.108 does not cover testimony regarding part of a conversation, a . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 90.108, Fla. . . .

D. CHRISTOPHER, v. STATE, 583 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1991)

. . . The rule of completeness is codified in section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1987), which provides that . . .

SCOTT, v. STATE, 559 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . request (after the state had rested its case) to play the remainder of the videotape falls within section 90.108 . . .

CBS, INC. M. v. L. COBB,, 536 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 90.108, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 536 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1988)

. . . . €¾ — section—90.108,—Florida—Statutes (1976), Rule- 1,330(6) Florida-Rules Civil Procedure, 1988 Amendment . . .

S. DUFFELL, v. SOUTH WALTON EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC. a Co. A. A., 501 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . In justifying the admission of the above portion of the report, the Quades rely upon Section 90.108, . . . I agree that section 90.108 controls the issue. . . . In commenting upon section 90.108, Professor Ehrhardt points out that there is a dispute among authorities . . . statute — the Third District Court of Appeal — has adopted the latter position, holding that section 90.108 . . .

SUNDALE ASSOCIATES, LTD. J. Jr. v. SOUTHEAST BANK, N. A., 471 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Sec. 90.108,* F[a. Stat. (1983). . . .

TALLAHASSEE JUNIOR ACADEMY, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION,, 461 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 90.108 requires that “[w]hen a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by . . .

MULFORD, v. STATE, 416 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The State contends that Section 90.108, Florida Statutes, required the introduction of the entire letter . . . Section 90.108, Florida Statutes, gave the State only a qualified right to seek the admission of the . . . entire letter: 90.108 Introduction of related writings or recorded statements. — When a writing or recorded . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. IN RE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 389 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1980)

. . . Cf. section 90.108, Florida Statutes (1976), Rule 1.330(6) Florida Rules Civil Procedure. . . . Cf. § 90.108, Fla. Stat. (1979); Rule 1.330(6) Fla.R.Civ.P. . . .