Cases from cite.case.law:

Fr. RONCHI, v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Ronchi further alleged that any such communication would be privileged under section 90.505, Florida . . . the alleged victim's waiver, her communications with Ronchi were no longer privileged under section 90.505 . . . To answer this question, one must examine two statutes-sections 90.505 and 90.507, Florida Statutes ( . . . Section 90.505(2) and (3) recognizes that the clergy privilege belongs to the person seeking spiritual . . . Section 90.505(2), Florida Statutes (2017) provides that a person "has a privilege to refuse to disclose . . .

UNITED STATES v. DURHAM,, 93 F. Supp. 3d 1291 (W.D. Okla. 2015)

. . . The court then considered the clergy privilege under' section 90.505 of Florida’s Code, which largely . . .

STATE v. TOPPS,, 142 So. 3d 978 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . counselor-victim (§ 90.5035(l)(e)l., 2., 3.), domestic violence advocate-victim (§ 90.5036(l)(d)l„ 2.), clergy (§ 90.505 . . .

ELLIOTT, v. STATE, 49 So. 3d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Pursuant to section 90.505(2), Florida Statutes (2007), “[a] person has a privilege to refuse to disclose . . . intended for further disclosure except to other persons present in furtherance of the communication.” § 90.505 . . .

MONROE, v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 90.505(1)(b) explicitly requires that the communication to a member of the clergy be “not intended . . .

I. NELSON, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,, 610 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 90.505, Fla. . . .

FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN, INC. v. M. BUSTER, v., 984 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Stat. (2006) (providing for husband-wife privilege); § 90.505, Fla. . . .

WOODARD, v. JUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL,, 972 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 2007)

. . . implicitly, recognizes that a cause of action exists-one for breach of the clergyman privilege under section 90.505 . . . extent it recognized a cause of action for a breach of the evidentiary privilege contained in section 90.505 . . .

DOHERTY, v. JOHN DOE NO., 957 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . other privileged communication except that between attorney and client or the privilege provided in s. 90.505 . . .

A. SEGARRA, III, v. SEGARRA,, 932 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See §§ 90.502, 90.503, 90.504, 90.505, 90.5055, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

WOODARD v. JUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC., 913 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . school, even a Christian school, is not a member of the “cler-. gy” for the purpose of applying section 90.505 . . . that Bellhorn’s status as “chaplain” does not fall within the clergyman privilege provided by section 90.505 . . . Section 90.505(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2004) defines a “member of the clergy” as “a priest, rabbi, practitioner . . . See § 90.505(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . patient’s mental or emotional condition ... between the patient and the psychotherapist -") with § 90.505 . . .

NUSSBAUMER, Jr. v. STATE, 882 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . produce records and answer questions over the objection of clergy communications privilege, section 90.505 . . . SECTION 90.505 AND ITS FOUR REQUIREMENTS ' Florida’s version of the clergy communications privilege is . . . set forth in section 90.505, which provides as follows: (1) For the purposes of this section: (a)A “ . . . Fortunately, section 90.505 does not require the courts to assess the spiritual content of the clergy . . . We decline to interpret section 90.505 in a way that would lead to such an interpretation of religious . . .

HILL, v. STATE, 846 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . other privileged communication except that between attorney and client or the privilege provided in s. 90.505 . . .

FERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 730 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1999)

. . . Appellant argues that these statements were privileged under the clergy communications privilege, section 90.505 . . . clergy which are confidential and made for the purpose of seeking spiritual advice are privileged. § 90.505 . . . member of the clergy to whom appellant went for spiritual advice, we still must determine under section 90.505 . . . Section 90.505 explicitly defines confidential communications for the purpose of clergy privilege as . . . those communications that are “made privately.” § 90.505(l)(b), Fla. . . .

STATE v. PINDER,, 678 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 90.505, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

JETT, v. STATE, 605 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . other privileged communication except that between attorney and client or the privilege provided in s. 90.505 . . .

In GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. UNITED STATES, 918 F.2d 374 (3d Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 90.505 (1989); Ga.Code Ann. § 24-9-22 (Michie 1989); Haw.Rev.Stat. § 624-45 (1988 & Supp.1989) (Rule . . .

BOTTOSON, v. STATE, 443 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1983)

. . . See § 90.505, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

M. DEEHL, v. F. KNOX, Jr., 414 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . (1979); see also § 90.503 (psychotherapist-patient privilege); § 90.504 (husband-wife privilege); § 90.505 . . .

COTTRILL, v. STATE, 365 So. 2d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . This privilege in reworded form has been retained in Section 90.505 of the new Florida Evidence Code . . .