Cases from cite.case.law:

S. P. R. P. v. VECCHIO, 162 So. 3d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 90.508(4), Fla. Stat. (2018). None of those exceptions apply in this case. . . .

CRAIN, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, 80 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.508, Florida Statutes (2011), recognizes a psychotherapist-patient privilege and carves out . . .

S I INVESTMENTS, a v. PAYLESS FLEA MARKET, INC., 10 So. 3d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Further, section 90.508, Florida Statutes, provides that evidence or disclosure of privileged matter . . .

MORDENTI, v. STATE, 982 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . I recognize that section 90.508, Florida Statutes (2006), renders inadmissible those disclosures that . . .

HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d b a d b a v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 731 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.508 provides that “[evidence of a statement or other disclosure of privileged matter is inadmissible . . .

MELODY v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 706 So. 2d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The privileges asserted here are based in part on section 90.508 of the Florida Evidence Code, which . . .

MYRON, a By BROCK B. B. v. DOCTORS GENERAL HOSPITAL, LTD. D B A N K A D. O. D. O. J. M. D. J. M. D. P. A. D. M. D. D. M. D. P. A. P. A. D B A D B A F. M. D. M. D. P. A. D B A M. D. M. D. P. A. D B A D B A D B A M. D. P. A., 704 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 90.508, Florida Statutes (1993), provides, in pertinent part: Evidence of a statement or other . . .

C. P. SMITH, v. ARMOUR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, 838 F. Supp. 1573 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 90.508 (Addressing a situation where the contents of a confidential document have become publicly . . .

RAY v. CUTTER LABORATORIES, DIVISION OF MILES, INC. Co., 746 F. Supp. 86 (M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . Defendant Cutter, however, relies for additional support on Florida Statutes, Section 90.508. . . . holder is believed to afford some remedy for the holder's expectation of privacy. 6B Fla.Stat.Ann., § 90.508 . . . states that “confidentiality, once destroyed, is not susceptible to restoration.” 6B Fla.Stat.Ann., § 90.508 . . .

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TRADE NATIONAL BANK,, 539 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Goldman, 474 So.2d 269 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Sections 90.507 and 90.508, Florida Statutes (1985); Compare . . .