Cases from cite.case.law:

PENA, v. RODRIGUEZ,, 273 So. 3d 237 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 90.605(1), Fla. . . .

DICKIE, v. STATE, 216 So. 3d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . We also note that section 90.605(1), Florida Statutes (2015), imposes an oath requirement on testifying . . . But we can find no case applying section 90.605(1) to sentencing proceedings. . . .

In G. S. a L. S. v. Ad In G. S. a O. S. v. Ad, 989 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 90.605(2), Florida Statutes (2006), provides that, as a matter of trial court discretion, “a . . .

WILLIS, v. ROMANO,, 972 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Cassels, 95 Fla. 851,116 So. 865 (1928) and § 90.605, Fla. Stat.). . . . Section 90.605, Florida Statutes, requires that each ■witness take an oath before giving testimony. . . . The witness’s answer shall be noted in the record. § 90.605(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . .” § 90.605(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Houck, 421 So.2d at 1115; § 90.605, Fla. Stat. (2007). AFFIRMED. THOMPSON and TORPY, JJ., concur. . . .

WILLIS, v. GAMI GOLDEN GLADES, LLC., 967 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Further, section 90.605 of the Florida Evidence Code operates to guard against giving false testimony . . .

WEST, v. INNOTRAC CORPORATION, a I X,, 463 F. Supp. 2d 1169 (D. Nev. 2006)

. . . relation to the sale of a security), NRS 90.580 and NRS 90.660(3) (manipulation of the market), and NRS 90.605 . . .

WINTERS, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS Of, 834 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .” § 90.605(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

EVANS, v. STATE, 813 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .” § 90.605(2). . . .

OSCARSON, v. ORANGE COUNTY,, 725 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 90.605(1), Fla. Stat.; United States v. . . .

HARRELL, v. STATE, 689 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 90.605, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fed.R.Evid. 603. . . .

SECCIA, v. STATE, 689 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 90.605(2), Fla. Stat. (1985); Lloyd v. State, 524 So.2d at 400. Id. at 758 (emphasis added). . . . Id. at 753 n. 1, citing § 90.605(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . Section 90.605(2) contains no requirement that a child understand why there is a duty to tell the truth . . .

SIMMONS, Jr. v. STATE, 683 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . This finding does not satisfy the criteria set forth in section 90.605(2), which require the trial court . . .

FULLER, v. STATE, 669 So. 2d 273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See also §§ 90.603(2) and 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

MURPHY, v. STATE, 667 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 90.605, Florida Statutes requires that each witness take the oath before testifying. . . . if the court determines the child understands the duty to tell the truth or the duty not to lie. § 90.605 . . . In a case involving a trial that occurred prior to the effective date of section 90.605(2), Florida Statutes . . .

ALLISON, v. STATE, 661 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

STATE v. FORD,, 626 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 1993)

. . . .” § 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . Section 90.605(2), Florida Statutes (1989), reads as follows: (2) In the court's discretion, a child . . .

STRICKLAND, v. STATE, 610 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See § 90.605, Fla.Stat. (1991); Houck v. State, 421 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA1982). . . .

M. B. v. STATE, 603 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See § 90.605, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

WADE, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . State, 524 So.2d 396 (Fla.1988), and sections 90.603(2) and 90.605(2), Florida Statutes (1985)). . . .

RIVET, v. STATE, 556 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .” § 90.605, Fla.Stat. (1988). In Lloyd v. . . . Under 90.603 and 90.605 this determination must be made before the court can allow a witness to proceed . . .

WOODFIN, v. STATE, 553 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . year old victim testifying without being sworn, we begin by setting forth the applicable 1987 statute: 90.605 . . .

W. GRIFFIN, v. STATE, 526 So. 2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . The amendment to section 90.605(2), Florida Statutes (1985), contemplates the possibility that a child . . . This finding does not satisfy the criteria set forth in section 90.605(2), which require the trial court . . . State, 93 So.2d 575 (Fla.1957); § 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . recollecting facts, is capable of narrating those facts, and appreciates the need to tell the truth. § 90.605 . . . Section 90.605(2) provides: (2) In the court’s discretion, a child may testify without taking the oath . . .

GLENDENING, v. STATE, 503 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . See § 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

SNOOK, v. FIRESTONE TIRE RUBBER COMPANY,, 485 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . §§ 90.605, and 90.607, Fla.Stat. (1985). See Houck v. State, 421 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). . . .

HOUCK, v. STATE, 421 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 90.605, Florida Statutes (1981), requires that “each witness shall declare that he will testify . . .

DEAN, v. STATE, 355 So. 2d 130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . We recognize that § 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. . . .