Cases from cite.case.law:

J. G. a v. STATE, 213 So. 3d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 90.613, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

J. SAS, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 112 So. 3d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 90.613, Fla. Stat. (2011); Merlin v. Boca Raton Cmty. . . .

HARRIS v. E. D. GRUNOW, Jr. O. R., 71 So. 3d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . pertinent parts of the prior statement silently in an effort to refresh the witness’s recollection (section 90.613 . . .

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, a v. BOCA AIRPORT, INC. d b a a, 987 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 90.613, Fla. Stat.; Merlin v. . . . In Merlin, we recognized that section 90.613, Florida Statutes, applies only to documents a witness refers . . . Section 90.613, Florida Statutes only requires discovery if the witness used the document “while testifying . . .

K. E. A. a v. STATE, 802 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . .); see also § 90.613, Fla. Stat. (1999); Garrett v. . . .

REID, v. STATE, 799 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The State misplaces its reliance on section 90.613, Florida Statutes (1997), as support for its argument . . .

G. CLAUSSEN, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 750 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.613, Florida Statutes (1997), permits a party to refresh a witness’s recollection by showing . . . The letter’s use as a memory refreshing device did not meet the predicate requirement of section 90.613 . . .

MORTON, v. STATE, 689 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Section 90.613 does not contemplate that evidence which might otherwise be inadmissible will be paraded . . .

R. PARE, v. STATE, 656 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 90.613, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

HALLMAN, v. STATE, 633 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . introduce the document into evidence should have been handled in accordance with the Evidence Code, section 90.613 . . .

GERALDS, v. STATE, 601 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 1992)

. . . witness’s notes either under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(b)(l)(x), or pursuant to section 90.613 . . . contention is that defense counsel was entitled to all of the witness’s field notes pursuant to section 90.613 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 574 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . State, 438 So.2d 358 (Fla.1983); Section 90.613, Florida Statutes (1989); Section 924.33, Florida Statutes . . .

DADE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST d b a v. PARKER,, 551 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . accident did not, as urged, allow the trial court to admit these reports as “refreshed recollection” [§ 90.613 . . .

WILSON, v. HUMANA OF FLORIDA,, 37 Fla. Supp. 2d 181 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Florida Statutes 90.613, provides: REFRESHING THE MEMORY OF A WITNESS — When a witness uses a writing . . .

MERLIN v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. Dr. S. Dr., 479 So. 2d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . One might infer, therefore, that the trial court was applying section 90.613, Florida Statutes (1983) . . . That section of our evidence code states: 90.613. . . .

PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM, INC. a v. HOTEL OCEAN ASSOCIATES, LTD. a, 479 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See § 90.613, Fla.Stat. (1983); McCormick On Evidence § 9 (Clearly 3d ed.1984). Affirmed. . . .

SCOTCHEL ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a Mr. G s v. VELEZ,, 455 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . to the statement to refresh his recollection, thereby entitling him to the statement under Section 90.613 . . . Section 90.613 provides in part that: When a witness uses a writing or other item to refresh his memory . . .

R. A. B. a v. STATE, 399 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . to refresh recollection need not be one which was made by or previously seen by the witness, see § 90.613 . . .