Cases from cite.case.law:

A. GUTIERREZ, v. VARGAS, M. D., 239 So. 3d 615 (Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 90.703, Fla. . . .

MOOTRY, As v. BETHUNE- COOKMAN UNIVERSITY, INC., 186 So. 3d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 90.703,. . . . .” § 90.703, Fla. Stat. . . .

SUTTON, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Cordia, 564 So.2d 601, 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (quoting section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1989), which . . .

STOKES, v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. BROADSPIRE,, 60 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . (providing qualified expert witness may testify in form of opinion); see also § 90.703, Fla. Stat. . . .

ESTATE OF MURRAY, Sr. L. MURRAY, Sr. v. DELTA HEALTH GROUP, INC. P., 30 So. 3d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . In addition, Guy relied on section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1981), which provided that “ ‘[tjestimony . . . decided before Town of Palm Beach, 460 So.2d at 882, in which the supreme court held that “section 90.703 . . . The supreme court held that section 90.703 was not intended to be so broad as to permit an expert to . . .

ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. v. FLORIDA BIRTH- RELATED NEUROLOGICAL,, 997 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . §§ 90.702, 90.703, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

BARTLETT, v. STATE, 993 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 90.703, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

DINKENS, v. STATE, 976 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that “testimony in the form of an opinion or inference . . .

L. CLARK, III, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 90.703, Fla. . . .

MARSH, v. VALYOU, Jr., 977 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Sections 90.702 and 90.703 deal specifically with expert testimony: 90.702 Testimony by experts. — If . . . form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial. 90.703 . . .

WAKULLA COMMERCIAL FISHERMEN S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION,, 951 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Moreover, this case can be affirmed only by disregarding the mandate of section 90.703, Florida Statutes . . .

FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR NEUROLOGIC REHABILITATION, INC. v. MARSHALL, 943 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The Martinez court explained that although section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1997) — which provides that . . .

LINN, v. D. FOSSUM, M. D., 946 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2006)

. . . .” § 90.703, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

STATE v. SANTIAGO,, 928 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See §§ 90.701; 90.703, Fla. Stat. (2005). The witness in question was another inmate, Eric Durant. . . .

FALCO, a v. COPELAND, a L. L. C. a a a d b a Co. a a, 919 So. 2d 650 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . ultimate issue in the case; In rejecting the opinion of this expert the court acknowledged that section 90.703 . . . The expert’s testimony was permissible under section 90.703, and should not have been rejected by the . . .

CHESNOFF, v. STATE, 840 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (2001), provides: Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise . . . opinion of Chesnoff s guilt; rather, it was a medical conclusion as to the severity of D.C.’s injuries. § 90.703 . . .

REYNOLDS, v. STATE, 837 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1999) states: Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise . . .

IVORY, v. STATE, 821 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (2001), provides that “[tjestimony in the form of an opinion or inference . . .

MESE, v. STATE, 824 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . because it includes an opinion on the ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact, see section 90.703 . . .

STATE v. SERCEY,, 825 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 90.703 provides: “Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not . . .

BUSH, v. STATE, 809 So. 2d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . State, 761 So.2d 1074, 1079 (Fla.2000) (explaining that although section 90.703 permits opinion testimony . . . medical conclusion as to the comparison of the objective findings with complaints voiced by Bush. § 90.703 . . .

M. TETRAULT T. v. A. FAIRCHILD,, 799 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes, provides that expert testimony may be received only if it can be applied . . .

J. E. W. a v. STATE, 770 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Appellant complains that the trial court erroneously admitted opinion testimony in violation of section 90.703 . . .

BRIM, v. STATE, 779 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 90.703-704, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE v. W. COOK,, 765 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See also § 90.703, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, v. A. KEMP,, 764 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 90.703, Fla. Stat. (1999); Town of Palm Beach. . . .

J. MARTINEZ, v. STATE, 761 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1997), which provides that “[t]estimony in the form of an opinion or . . .

Z. SCHNEER v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 767 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Under section 90.703 of Florida’s Evidence Code, a witness is permitted to testify to an ultimate fact . . . is not objectionable because it includes an ultimate issue to be decided' by the trier of fact.” § 90.703 . . .

W. McLEAN, v. STATE, 754 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Although section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1995), allows opinion testimony on an ultimate issue, the . . .

MARTINEZ, v. VEGA a, 751 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Further, as section 90.703 Florida Statutes (1999) provides: Opinion on ultimate issue. — Testimony-in . . .

GUTIERREZ, v. STATE, 739 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . §§ 90.702, 90.703, Fla. . . .

RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. v. PEREZ,, 715 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See generally section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1997); see also Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 703.1 (1998 . . .

BOOKHARDT, v. STATE, 710 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 90.703, Fla. Stat. See generally McMullen v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S207 (Fla. . . . not objectionable merely because it includes an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact. § 90.703 . . .

In ESTATE OF McQUEEN, E. HOLLEY R. v. FIRST GUARANTY BANK TRUST COMPANY,, 699 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 90.703, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

HAMILTON, v. STATE, 696 So. 2d 914 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Although section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that opinion testimony may be admitted on . . .

ZECCHINO, v. STATE, 691 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . As the supreme court explained in Glendening, “[although section 90.703 [“Opinion on Ultimate Issue”] . . .

BEAULIEU, v. STATE, 671 So. 2d 807 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . least four separate tests and is admissible under the relevancy standard adopted by sections 90.702 and 90.703 . . .

STINFIL, v. STATE, 668 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Although section 90.703 would appear to permit such an opinion, such testimony is precluded on the basis . . .

GAMBLE, v. STATE, 644 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 90.703 further provides that expert testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise . . . Although the Federal Rules of Evidence have a provision similar to section 90.703, they also contain . . . Section 90.703 provides: Opinion on ultimate issue. — Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference . . . It is true that section 90.703 of the evidence code provides that opinion testimony is not objectionable . . . . § 90.703, Fla.Stat. (1991). The jury, however, was not aided by Agent Rocque’s testimony. . . .

FINO, J. v. NODINE, E. H., 646 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Although section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1991), permits opinion testimony on an ultimate issue to be . . . decided by the trier of fact, “section 90.703 does not imply the admissibility of all opinions [on an . . . applicable to lay witness testimony because the court was giving a direct interpretation of section 90.703 . . .

AUDANO, v. STATE, 641 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Pursuant to sections 90.702 and 90.703, Florida Statutes (1993), the relevancy of the expert’s opinion . . .

STATE v. TOWNSEND,, 635 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1994)

. . . Relevancy of a medical expert’s opinion is determined by the requirements set forth in sections 90.702 and 90.703 . . .

EASLEY, v. STATE, 629 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial. 90.703 . . .

L. RUTH, v. STATE, 610 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See Ehrhardt on Evidence, § 90.703 at 451 (West 1977). . . . We do not think that section 90.703 was intended to be so broad. . . . See e.g., Ehrhardt, § 90.703; Feldman v. . . .

STATE v. CORDIA,, 564 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .” § 90.703, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

EASTERN AIRLINES, INC. a v. KING, a Jo, 561 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Silva, 476 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); § 90.703, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

TOYOTA OF PENSACOLA v. E. MAINES,, 558 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1987). AFFIRMED. WIGGINTON, J., concurs. . . .

LINDABURY, v. LINDABURY, 552 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . §§ 90.702 and 90.703, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . whether expert testimony on post traumatic stress syndrome is admissible under sections 90.702 and 90.703 . . . form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial. 90.703 . . .

NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION,, 541 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . We find his testimony in that regard was competent and admissible pursuant to sections 90.703 and 90.704 . . .

GLENDENING, v. STATE, 536 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1988)

. . . Sections 90.702 and 90.703, Florida Statutes (1985), deal with admissibility of expert testimony and . . . form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial. 90.703 . . . Although section 90.703 would appear to permit such an opinion, such testimony is precluded on the basis . . .

ZWINGE, v. J. HETTINGER, L., 530 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Under section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1985), an expert witness is allowed to testify to an ultimate . . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1985) states: Opinion on ultimate issue. — Testimony in the form of . . .

In ESTATE OF C. J. LENAHAN, N. LENAHAN, v. L. LENAHAN, Sr. J. Jr., 511 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 90.703, Florida Statutes, provides as follows: 90.703 Opinion on ultimate issue. . . . Palm Beach County, 460 So.2d 879 (Fla.1984) and Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 90.703 (2d Ed.1984). . . . Many courts have interpreted Section 90.703 or its equivalent Federal Rule 704 as permitting witnesses . . . Therefore, under Section 90.703, the fact that the expert’s testimony may include an ultimate issue to . . .

BLOODWORTH, v. STATE, 504 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . See Section 90.703, Florida Statutes ; Ferradas v. . . . Section 90.703 provides: Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not . . .

AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, INC. Co. Co. D. v. TEHRANI, 508 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 90.703, Fla.Stat.; Moles v. Gotti, 433 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. KAY, 493 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . confident that upon retrial the trial court will be careful to properly apply the provisions of section 90.703 . . .

FRIDOVICH, v. STATE, 489 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . In addition, section 90.703 permits the expert to offer an opinion on an ultimate issue to be decided . . .

KRUSE, v. STATE, 483 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Sections 90.702and 90.703 deal specifically with expert testimony: 90.702 Testimony by experts. — If . . . form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial. 90.703 . . . The North view is also consistent with the provisions of section 90.703 of the evidence code, which provides . . . The Third District has held that section 90.703 permits an expert to testify in a prosecution for rape . . .

PANTRY PRIDE v. HAYES, Jr., 477 So. 2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Phillips, 368 So.2d 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); §§ 90.703, 90.704, Fla.Stat. (1983); § 440.39(3)(a), Fla.Stat . . .

M CORPORATION- McGHAN MEDICAL REPORTS DIVISION, v. BROWN,, 475 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 90.703 codifies this principle by providing that opinion testimony is not objectionable solely . . .

TOWN OF PALM BEACH v. PALM BEACH COUNTY,, 460 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Petitioners argue that section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1981), permits opinion testimony on an ultimate . . . However, section 90.703 does not imply the admissibility of all opinions. . . . See Ehrhardt on Evidence, § 90.703 at 451 (West 1977). . . . We do not think that section 90.703 was intended to be so broad. . . . See e.g., Ehrhardt, § 90.703; Feldman v. . . .

M. GUY, v. D. KIGHT, Sr., 431 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Furthermore, Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1981) provides that “[testimony in the form of an opinion . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY, D. v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH, a a a C. a, 426 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . (We do not overlook Section 90.703, Florida Statutes (1981), in reaching this conclusion.) . . .

SARNO, Al G. Jr. v. STATE STATE v. GILLEY,, 424 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . argument, although the Florida Evidence Code would clearly render ultimate fact opinion admissible, § 90.703 . . .

LOPEZ, v. COHEN a, 406 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Even prior to the adoption of § 90.703 of the Evidence Code, a witness was permitted to testify to an . . .

DANDASHI v. B. FINE, M. D. M. D., 397 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . We note that the Evidence Code, Sections 90.703, 90.704, 90.705, Florida Statutes (1979), changes Florida . . .