Cases from cite.case.law:

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 253 So. 3d 684 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, v. GARCIA,, 254 So. 3d 565 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND, v. G. KOULOUVARIS a k a, 247 So. 3d 652 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. . . . sufficient evidence "to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims." § 90.901 . . . State, 946 So.2d 988, 1000 (Fla. 2006) ("While section 90.901 requires the authentication or identification . . .

J. LAMB, v. STATE, 246 So. 3d 400 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

ASENCIO, Jr. v. STATE, 244 So. 3d 294 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

WARWICK CORPORATION, H. E. S. v. TURETSKY,, 227 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 215 So. 3d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . We begin our analysis of Evans by emphasizing that it is not premised on section 90.901, Florida Statutes . . .

MULLENS, v. STATE, 197 So. 3d 16 (Fla. 2016)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

SANTANA, v. STATE, 191 So. 3d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . audio recordings, “there [is] no specific list of requirements” to determine compliance with section 90.901 . . .

HIDDEN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ONEWEST BANK, N. A., 183 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . the “authentication” of the business records, a condition precedent to admissibility under section 90.901 . . .

L. T. v. STATE, 183 So. 3d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. . . .

THOMAS, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 643 F. App'x 827 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 90.901. . . .

CLARK, v. STATE, 170 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. . . .

LERNER, v. HALEGUA,, 154 So. 3d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2014), states: Authentication or identification of evidence is required . . .

BEAZLEY, v. STATE, 148 So. 3d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

HILDWIN, v. STATE, 141 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 2014)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

VILSAINT, v. STATE, 127 So. 3d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2010), addresses authentication and provides that it is a condition . . .

GOSCIMINSKI, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2009), requires the authentication or identification of a document . . . However, the requirements of section 90.901 “are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding . . . that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” § 90.901, Fla. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

D. D. B. v. STATE, 109 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. . . .

MACK, v. STATE, 106 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2010), requires the authentication or identification of a document . . .

VAUGHAN, v. BROWARD GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER, 105 So. 3d 569 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2011), states, “Authentication or identification of evidence is required . . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

SYMONETTE, v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.901 addresses the authentication of evidence. . . . evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” § 90.901 . . .

LOPEZ, v. STATE, 97 So. 3d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 90.901, Fla. Stat. . . .

STATE v. WILBURN,, 93 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2010), provides “[ajuthentication ... of evidence is required as a . . .

CORTINAS, v. STATE, 91 So. 3d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

TUTOR TIME CHILD CARE LEARNING CENTERS v. PATTERSON,, 91 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . to the hearsay rule under section 90.803(6), Florida Statutes, but also an exception to the section 90.901 . . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2008), states, “[ajuthentication or identification of evidence is required . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. W. DARRAGH,, 95 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule, section 90.803(8), provided they are authenticated, section 90.901 . . .

STATE v. HOLLAND,, 76 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Crawford, the court never determined whether the State properly authenticated the videotape under section 90.901 . . .

D. J. a v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . we agree that the court below erred in admitting this evidence without proper authentication, see § 90.901 . . .

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ESTATE OF D. LEVINE, HOWARD,, 87 So. 3d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

STATE v. R. HAMPTON,, 44 So. 3d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Chain of Custody as Preliminary Evidence of Identity under Section 90.901 We are not convinced that L.R . . . issue in this case, addressing the admissibility of an exhibit, are properly analyzed under section 90.901 . . . Under section 90.901, evidence of a chain of custody is provided as preliminary or foundational evidence . . . evidence of a matter merely indicates initial sufficiency for presentation to the trier of fact. § 90.901 . . . This too is an issue involving foundational or predicate evidence under section 90.901, but it is not . . .

KNIGHT, v. STATE, 20 So. 3d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

AMOS, v. GARTNER, INC., 17 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

ACOSTA, v. STATE, 3 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2006); Jackson v. State, 979 So.2d 1153, 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). . . .

SUNBELT HEALTH CARE AHS, v. GALVA,, 7 So. 3d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2007). The use of circumstantial evidence to authenticate is permissible. . . .

OQUENDO, v. STATE, 2 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

K. BUSH, v. STATE, 992 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2005); Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence §§ 901.1-901.2 (2007). . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 979 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2006), requires as a condition precedent to admissibility that evidence . . . present case there are numerous indicators of the authenticity of the tape for purposes of section 90.901 . . . We note in passing that even if the tape had not been properly authenticated for purposes of section 90.901 . . .

CASAMASSINA, v. UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN CITY OF NEW YORK, 958 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

CODAY, v. STATE, 946 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 2006)

. . . Coday asserts that this was error under section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1997), which requires authentication . . . While section 90.901 requires the authentication or identification of a document prior to its admission . . . See § 90.901, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 919 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Under section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2001), “[ajuthentication or identification of evidence is required . . .

ELIAKIM, v. STATE, 884 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .”); § 90.802 (except as provided by statute hearsay is categorically inadmissible); § 90.901 (authentication . . .

O LEARY, v. USA WASTE MANAGEMENT, 863 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . recorded statement which was not confirmed on this record as being properly authenticated under section 90.901 . . .

HUNT, v. STATE, 746 So. 2d 559 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1997) provides simply: Authentication or identification of evidence . . .

CIRILLO v. DAVIS, 732 So. 2d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1997), requires evidence to be authenticated. . . .

PLEMONDON, v. FERNANDEZ, M. D. M. D. P. A. M. D. D. C., 699 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . authenticity of the letter; however, the plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of its authenticity under 90.901 . . .

PEREZ, v. STATE, 698 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . We believe that this testimony meets the test of authentication as set out in section 90.901, Florida . . .

STATE v. E. LOVE,, 691 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 90.901 of the Florida Statutes (1995) requires authentication or identification of evidence as . . . DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . 90.901 Requirement of authentication or identification. — Authentication . . .

A. MILLS, v. E. BARKER,, 664 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1993). In this case, Mr. . . . extrinsic evidence sufficient to support a finding that the agreement met the requirements of section 90.901 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 660 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 90.901-902, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 660 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 90.901-902, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

LOUIS, v. STATE, 647 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1991), requires authentication of evidence as a condition precedent . . .

DANIELS, v. STATE, 634 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

ITT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC. v. CHANDLER INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. a, 617 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

VAZ, v. STATE, 599 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See §§ 90.901, 90.-952, 90.953, and 90.954, Fla.Stat. (1991). The conviction is therefore affirmed. . . .

A. VAN DEN BORRE, v. STATE, 596 So. 2d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . However, since the diplomatic notes were neither properly authenticated as required by section 90.901 . . . Under section 90.901, evidence is authenticated when prima facie evidence is introduced to prove that . . . Thus, since section 90.901 requires that a document be authenticated as a condition precedent to its . . . We hold that the requirements of section 90.901 of the Florida Evidence Code were satisfied by evidence . . .

CALVACHE, v. JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 54 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . examining the signature and comparing it with the signature on the check that the Guaranty was authentic. 90.901 . . .

A. HUTCHINSON, v. STATE, 580 So. 2d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla.Stat. . . . . §§ 90.901, 90.-952, 90.953, and 90.954, Florida Statutes (1989). . . .

PENNSYLVANIA BLUE SHIELD, v. S. WOLFE,, 575 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1989); C. . . .

BUCHANAN, v. STATE, 575 So. 2d 704 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Bass Ranch, 379 So.2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . .” § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . In the instant case, the state argues that under section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1987), the letter . . .

GARCIA, v. STATE, 564 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 90.901 p. 376 (West 1979) (Law Revision Council Note — 1976) (“Authentication and identification . . . See also, e.g., 6C Fla.Stat.Ann. § 90.901, at 376-81 (West 1979) (Law Revision Council Note — 1976); . . .

STATE v. WELLS,, 538 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

SUNNYVALE MARITIME CO. INC. v. GOMEZ,, 546 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1987), provides that the authentication requirement is satisfied by . . . The Law Revision Council Note to Section 90.901 points out that the “admission into evidence of a matter . . .

LOREN, v. STATE, 518 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . authentication of the transcript conformed to the rule for authentication for use as evidence, section 90.901 . . . State, 438 So.2d 358, 365 (Fla.1983) (under evidence code, section 90.901, Florida Statutes (1981), the . . .

ALLEN, v. STATE, 492 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . was not admissible because its authenticity was never established as required under the code, section 90.901 . . . evidence is “sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” § 90.901 . . .

SIKES, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a, 487 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . The document in question was authenticated by the testimony of the Department’s official (see section 90.901 . . .

JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 486 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . .-803(8), provided they are authenticated, section 90.901, by a custodian, sections 90.-902(4) and 90.955 . . .

E. F. K. COLLINS CORP. v. S. M. M. G. INC. a, 464 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Since appellee did not comply with either section 90.901, (requirement of authentication or identification . . .

JUSTUS, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1983)

. . . .” § 90.901, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .