The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.06

92.06 Judgments and decrees of United States District Courts.—All final judgments and decrees heretofore or hereafter to be rendered and entered in the United States District Courts of this state and certified copies thereof are declared to be admissible as prima facie evidence in the several courts of this state of the entry and validity of such judgments and decrees.

History.—s. 1, ch. 14748, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 4391(1).

F.S. 92.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE KING,, 546 B.R. 682 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . This accountant has requested fees of $4,936.00 and reimbursable expenses of $92.06, for a total amount . . .

ARNOLD, v. SALAZAR,, 970 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Michael Brown 100.00 C.D. 98.24 S.V. 98.24 Sylvia Felder 93.82 S.S. 93.82 C.A. 92.94 Romella Arnold 92.06 . . .

NASSAR, MD, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER,, 674 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . Larsen, Larson on Employment Discrimination § 92.06[2] (2d ed. 2011). . 301 F.3d 240, 251 (5th Cir.2002 . . .

THEME PROMOTIONS, INC. a d b a Co- Op v. NEWS AMERICA MARKETING FSI, INC. a, 731 F. Supp. 2d 937 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . hourly wage (w) Market hourly rate (r) Mean hourly wage (w) Market hourly rate (r) 1997 0.394 $36.27 $ 92.06 . . .

BENDAOUD, v. C. HODGSON,, 578 F. Supp. 2d 257 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . The highest price the record reflects for ADI stock is $92.06 on October 5, 2000, and the lowest is $18.29 . . .

J. HYMAN, M. D. v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, 53 F. App'x 740 (6th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 92.06(E) (1999). . . .

J. HYMAN, M. D. v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE,, 132 F. Supp. 2d 528 (W.D. Ky. 2001)

. . . . § 92.06(E). . . . Code Ord. § 98.17(D); Jeff.Co.Code Ord. § 92.06(E). . . . Lou.Code Ord. § 98.17(D); Jeff.Co.Code Ord. § 92.06(E). . . .

ZERILLI, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 973 F. Supp. 311 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination, § 92.06 at 92-39 (2d ed.1996). . . .

BROWN, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS,, 671 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Kan. 1987)

. . . One high school, Topeka West High School, had a white student population exceeding ninety percent — 92.06% . . .

FREEMAN, E. v. RUBIN,, 318 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . In addition, we note that the subject order was admissible pursuant to § 92.06, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . . State of Florida, 312 F.Supp. 1292 (M.D.Fla.1967), affirmed, 398 F.2d 880 (5th Cir. 1968). . “92.06 Judgments . . .

, 39 F. 376 (D. Or. 1889)

. . . Neil, against the ship Borrowdale, to recover a balance of $92.06, alleged to be due the libelant for . . . receive the sum of $176, of which sum only $83.94 has been paid, leaving a balance due the libel-ant of $92.06 . . .