The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.07

92.07 Judgments and decrees of this state.—The recitals in all judgments and decrees of the Supreme Court and of the several circuit courts of this state, when such judgment or decree appears regular and has been recorded as provided by law for more than 20 years, shall be admissible in evidence as prima facie proof of the truth of the facts so recited. Either party to any suit at law or equity may offer a properly certified copy of such judgment or decree entered and recorded more than 20 years prior to the institution of the suit in which the same is offered, and such copy shall be admissible in evidence as prima facie proof of the facts in said judgment or decree set forth; provided, however, the party offering the same shall at least 10 days before the trial of the suit in which this copy is offered in evidence give notice to the opposite side of the intention to offer such copy in evidence and the purpose for which the same will be offered, and deliver with such notice a copy of the judgment or decree; provided, that nothing in this law shall render admissible in evidence any instrument of writing based on any judgment, deed of conveyance or power of attorney included in this law where any such instrument of writing has heretofore been brought in question in any action at law or in equity in any suit now pending or heretofore decided.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10111, 1925; CGL 4391.

F.S. 92.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE CATES, v. L., 588 B.R. 916 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2018)

. . . See Collins , 943 P.2d at 22 (quoting 11 Thompson on Real Property , § 92.07(d) (D. . . .

CONTANGO OPERATORS, INC. JHB- CJP- v. UNITED STATES, 9 F. Supp. 3d 735 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . . § 92.07-10 (requiring that “[t]he hull, superstructure, structural bulkheads, decks, and deckhous-es . . .

UNITED STATES v. LONG, 958 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Thus the full weight of the liquid in the pickle jar, 92.07 grams, may be counted for purposes of § 841 . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 476 B.R. 843 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012)

. . . those claims are resolved through settlement or litigation. 6-92 Collier Bankruptcy Practice Guide ¶ 92.07 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. GENTRY,, 555 F.3d 659 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . Kansas City Police recovered 92.07 grams of a cloudy liquid from a pickle jar found in the vehicle Gentry . . . Thus, the full weight of the liquid in the pickle jar, 92.07 grams, may be counted for purposes of § . . . The government repeatedly characterizes the evidence as showing that Gentry possessed 92.07 grams of . . .

ACTION MANUFACTURING CO. INC. v. SIMON WRECKING CO., 428 F. Supp. 2d 288 (E.D. Pa. 2006)

. . . volumetric share of the 7.93% 6.25% combined drum count in (c) e CSDG’s volumetric share of the combined 92.07% . . . settlements are $17,001,283 $16,466,995 — -X subtracted i CSDG’s share of total estimated site costs 92.07% . . .

J. HYMAN, M. D. v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE,, 132 F. Supp. 2d 528 (W.D. Ky. 2001)

. . . . § 92.07(B). The plaintiff, J. Barrett Hyman, M.D. . . . Lou.Code Ord. § 98.00; Jeff.Co.Code Ord. § 92.07(B). . . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 4,521 99.19% 6 0.13% 4 0.09% 27 0.59% 0 0.00% OVERTON ROAD METHODIST/4608 LEEDS 7,713 100.00% 7,101 92.07% . . .

BRANCA, a a BRANCA, v. SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 773 F.2d 1158 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . In relevant part, the law recites: 92.07 Judgments and decrees of this state as evidence The recitals . . . FLA.STAT.ANN. § 92.07 (West 1984). . Johns v. Burns, 67 So.2d 765, 767 (Fla.1953). . Id. . . . .

MONTGOMERY WARD CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 362 F. Supp. 560 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . Compare, heading 92.07 (electronic principle used “in particular for the ‘organ’ type of instrument”) . . . See also, Explanatory Notes to tlie Brussels Nomenclature, Volume III (1955), compare heading 92.07 with . . .

Co. v., 70 Cust. Ct. 193 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . Compare, heading 92.07 (electronic principle used “in particular for the ‘organ’ type of instrument”) . . . See also, Explanatory Notes to the Brussels Nomenclature, Volume III (1955), compare heading 92.07 with . . .

CISNEROS v. CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 324 F. Supp. 599 (S.D. Tex. 1970)

. . . H. .75 92.07 7.18 Crockett Elem. 6.39 90.69 2.92 Evans Elem. 6.48 93.06 0.46 Kostoryz Elem. -0-36.14 . . .

In HOBBS CO., 145 F. 211 (N.D.W. Va. 1906)

. . . in rejecting the claims of the Dickerson Building Supply Company for $192.30 and of Allen & Son for $92.07 . . .

LEE v. KAUFMAN, 15 F. Cas. 162 (C.C.E.D. Va. 1879)

. . . The tax imposed on Arlington was $92.07. . . .