Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 92.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 92.09 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 92.09

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.09
92.09 Effect of reversal, etc., of judgment or successful attack on deed.No copy of a judgment or decree shall be admitted in evidence as aforesaid when it shall be made to appear that such decree has been reversed, annulled, vacated, or set aside, or that the same in collateral proceedings has been successfully attacked. No deed shall be admitted in evidence as hereinbefore provided if it shall appear that the execution or validity of said deed has been successfully attacked in any proceedings to which the grantee therein named or those or any of them holding under such grantee has been a party or parties.
History.s. 3, ch. 10111, 1925; CGL 4393.

F.S. 92.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

U. S. BANK N. A. v. THUNDER PROPERTIES, INC., 352 F. Supp. 3d 1042 (D. Nev. 2018)

. . . Thomas, Thompson on Real Property § 92.09(c), at 173 (2nd Thomas ed. 2002). . . .

US BANK, N. A. v. RENOVISTA RIDGE MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, 352 F. Supp. 3d 1034 (D. Nev. 2018)

. . . Thomas, Thompson on Real Property § 92.09(c), at 173 (2nd Thomas ed. 2002). . . .

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, Of Ap- v. J. BLANFORD, G. D. P. D. A. J. E. L. L. C. LLC, LLC, Co. USA, RBC LLC,, 794 F.3d 297 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . As news of the Einhorn Report leaked into the market, Green Mountain’s stock price fell from $92.09 to . . .

In L. SAVAGE K. T. v. LLC, 504 B.R. 921 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2014)

. . . Thomas, Thompson on Real Property § 92.09(c)(3) (2d ed. 2002) (emphasis added)). . . .

HINES D B A v. PLANE PAINT, INC., 430 F. Supp. 2d 598 (S.D. Miss. 2005)

. . . , the costs which will be awarded are as follows: Facsimiles $ 32.25 Photocopies $ 473.25 Postage $ 92.09 . . .

In HILLSBOROUGH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,, 221 B.R. 917 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . This Court awarded fees to Strooek in the amount of $6,216.606 or 92.09% of the requested amount in the . . .

In M. QUINTANA J. M. QUINTANA J. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,, 107 B.R. 234 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1989)

. . . to the extent the claim is not an allowed secured claim ... 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 92.09 . . .

B. CURTIS, L. a GRAND, Jr. a, 240 F. Supp. 475 (E.D. Mo. 1965)

. . . Louis Courts of Appeals as to the correct interpretation of Supreme Court Civil Rule 92.09, V.A.M.R., . . . Sec. 92.09 provides: “No injunction or restraining order, unless on final hearing or judgment, shall . . . Section 526.070 V.A.M.S. is the same as the rule (92.09) except that it does not specify “restraining . . .

Ex FORD, v. BOEGER, St., 236 F. Supp. 831 (E.D. Mo. 1964)

. . . Louis Court of Appeals on the interpretation of Supreme Court Rule 92.09, V.A.M.R. and Mo.R.S. 1959, . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO., 38 F. Supp. 333 (D. Mass. 1941)

. . . up as follows: Value of the policy $1452.00 1939 Dividend 12.68 1464.68 Policy Loan $415.00 Interest 92.09 . . .