The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.28

92.28 Records destroyed by fire; land title suits; what may be received in evidence.—In all suits or proceedings concerning any land, or any estate, interest or right in, or any lien or encumbrance upon the same, when it shall be made to appear that the original of any deed, conveyance, map, plat or other written or record evidence has been lost or destroyed, or is not in the power, custody or control of the party wishing to use it on the trial to produce same, and the record thereof has been heretofore destroyed by fire, the court shall receive all such evidence as may have a bearing on the case to establish the execution or contents of any deed, conveyance, map, plat record, or other written evidence so lost or destroyed; provided, that the testimony of the parties themselves shall be received only in such cases, and subject to all the qualifications in respect to such testimony as now provided by law; and provided further, that any writing in the hands of any person or persons, which may become admissible in evidence under the provisions of this section, or any part of this law, shall be rejected and not admitted as evidence, unless the same appear upon the face thereof without erasure, blemish, alteration, interlineation or interpolation in any material part, unless the same shall be explained to the satisfaction of the court, and appear fairly and honestly made in the ordinary course of business.

History.—s. 5, ch. 4951, 1901; GS 1532; RGS 2732; CGL 4404.

F.S. 92.28 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.28 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.28

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.28

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.28.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE OI S. A. a, 587 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . easily met this quorum requirement, with the following percentages by value of claims in attendance: 92.28% . . .

TFWS, INC. t a v. SCHAEFER,, 315 F. Supp. 2d 775 (D. Md. 2004)

. . . Bacardi Light 89.96 108.96 92.28 31. Capt. Morgan’s Spiced Rum 110.96 125.94 113.94 32. . . .

In GREEN, v. Co. Co. d b a, 281 B.R. 699 (D. Kan. 2002)

. . . According to the agreement, the debtor “leased” the equipment for 84 months at a rate of $92.28 per month . . .

FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS T. J. F., 770 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Specification 1 alleged that on May 22, 1994, T.J.F. unlawfully obtained a refund in the amount of $92.28 . . .

SUPERIOR TESTERS, INC. v. DAMCO TESTERS, INC., 336 F. Supp. 37 (E.D. La. 1971)

. . . Jacobson incurred travel expenses of $2764.37; telephone tolls of $528.26; and copying costs of $92.28 . . .

SYLVA V. DOVE v. THE UNITED STATES, 161 Ct. Cl. 768 (Ct. Cl. 1963)

. . . these are deducted, the potential workdays are reduced to 1,930, and plaintiff’s work time accounts for 92.28 . . .