Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 92.51 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 92.51 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 92.51

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.51
92.51 Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments; taken or administered by commissioned officer of United States Armed Forces.
(1) Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments required or authorized by the laws of this state may be taken or administered within or without the United States by or before any commissioned officer in active service of the Armed Forces of the United States with the rank of second lieutenant or higher in the Army, Air Force, Space Force, or Marine Corps or ensign or higher in the Navy or Coast Guard when the person required or authorized to make and execute the oath, affidavit, or acknowledgment is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, the spouse of such member, or a person whose duties require the person’s presence with the Armed Forces of the United States.
(2) A certificate endorsed upon the instrument which shows the date of the oath, affidavit, or acknowledgment and which states in substance that the person appearing before the officer acknowledged the instrument as the person’s act or made or signed the instrument under oath shall be sufficient for all intents and purposes. The instrument shall not be rendered invalid by the failure to state the place of execution or acknowledgment.
(3) If the signature, rank, and branch of service or subdivision thereof of any commissioned officer appears upon such instrument, document or certificate no further proof of the authority of such officer so to act shall be required and such action by such commissioned officer shall be prima facie evidence that the person making such oath, affidavit or acknowledgment is within the purview of this act.
History.ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 61-196; s. 3, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379; s. 518, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 2022-183.
Note.Former s. 90.011.

F.S. 92.51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.51 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.51


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.51
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.51.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 577 F. Supp. 2d 347 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 92.51; Circular A-87, Attach. C, ¶ F.3. . . .

In AUTO INTERNATIONAL REFRIGERATION, H. v., 275 B.R. 789 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . 0.05% 96.33 0.00 1/6/99 C/J 60.84 $192,590.02 0.05% 96.30 0.00 1/7/99 C/3 7,562.34 $185,027.68 0.05% 92.51 . . . 0.00 1/8/99 C/H 0.00 $185,027.68 0.05% 92.51 0.00 1/9/99 (V3 0.00 $185,027.68 0.05% 92.51 0.00 1/10/ . . . 89.70 0.00 2/24/99 Cid 349.53 $186,637.26 0.05% 93.32 7,579.46 2/25/99 CO 1,619.50 $185,017.76 0.05% 92.51 . . . 0.00 2/26/99 00 0.00 $185,017.76 0.05% 92.51 0.00 2/27/99 00 0.00 $185,017.76 0.05% 92.51 0.00 2/28/ . . .

COOPER, v. HOPKINS,, 945 F. Supp. 940 (S.D. Miss. 1995)

. . . C. jExpenses This court finds that Tara Walker is entitled to travel expenses of $92.51 for trips to . . .

C. NEFF, v. ADLER L., 416 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See sections 92.50, 92.51 and 695.25, Florida Statutes (1979). . . . See again sections 92.50 and 92.51 as well as 5 Bigham, Tennessee Practice § 1115. . . .

STATE NEW MEXICO, NEW MEXICO STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. UNITED STATES, 665 F.2d 1023 (Ct. Cl. 1981)

. . . The agreement required that FHWA reimburse SHD to the extent of 92.51 percent of the acquisition costs . . . FHWA fully participated in (i. e., bore) 92.51 percent of SHD’s cost of acquisition of parcel 2-2, but . . . that, under a proper construction of relevant sections of that act, defendant is obligated to bear 92.51 . . .

THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, EX REL. NEW MEXICO STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. THE UNITED STATES, 229 Ct. Cl. 99 (Ct. Cl. 1981)

. . . The agreement required that FHWA reimburse SHD to the extent of 92.51 percent of the acquisition costs . . . FHWA fully participated in (i.ebore) 92.51 percent of SHD’s cost of acquisition of parcel 2-2, but failed . . . that, under a proper construction of relevant sections of that act, defendant is obligated to bear 92.51 . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ARIZONA, 452 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1981)

. . . S 01°08/01// E 92.51 feet; 588. S 05°10'25" E 229.55 feet; 589. S 02°20'32" W 225.35 feet; 590. . . .