Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 95.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 95.04 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 95.04

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS
Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 95.04
95.04 Promise to pay barred debt.An acknowledgment of, or promise to pay, a debt barred by a statute of limitations must be in writing and signed by the person sought to be charged.
History.s. 1, ch. 4375, 1895; GS 1717; RGS 2930; CGL 4650; s. 6, ch. 74-382.

F.S. 95.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 95.04


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 95.04
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 95.04.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ARMITAGE v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING MECHANICAL, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 763 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . $ 95.04 October 3, 2002 $1,320.00 $13.75 $ 110.00 October 10, 2002 $ 680.00 $ 7.08 $ 56.64 October . . .

SCHROEDER a k a J. v. R. MANCERI, L., 893 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Under section 95.04, Florida Statutes, a-promise to pay a debt barred by the statute of limitations must . . . However, the extension in this case was not required to have been in writing under either section 95.04 . . .

DEAKTER, v. MENENDEZ, Jr., 830 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Even if, as Menendez suggests, any claim on the 1988 notes was time-barred in 1995, section 95.04, Florida . . . 1995 note was “an acknowledgment of, or promise to pay, a debt barred by a statute of limitations.” § 95.04 . . .

In STEWART,, 215 B.R. 633 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . Florida Statute ch. 95.04 provides that “an acknowl-edgement of, or promise to pay, a debt barred by . . . Fla.Stat. eh. 95.04 (1997). The courts’ interpretations of this statute are few and murky at best. . . . Nolden, 650 So.2d 84, 85 (Fla. 5th D.C.A.1995), interpreting Fla.Stat. ch. 95.04, the Fifth Circuit District . . . The Court finds that under the strict interpretation of Fla.Stat. eh. 95.04 the debt was barred and rendered . . . is whether a time barred debt can be revived by the writings of the Debtor pursuant to Fla.Stat. ch. 95.04 . . .

NOLDEN, v. P. NOLDEN, 650 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . promissory note), barred by the statute of limitations, was revived under the provisions of section 95.04 . . . financial affidavit in a dissolution proceeding normally will not meet the promissory threshold of section 95.04 . . .

LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE CENTERS, v. SHALALA, U. S. R. LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE CENTERS, v. E. SHALALA, Jr., 24 F.3d 984 (7th Cir. 1994)

. . . The three exceptions were ICD-9 codes 87.53, 92.27 and 95.04. .It is unclear whether the reference to . . .

In KESSLER MANUFACTURING CORP., 109 B.R. 516 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . Section 95.04 is controlling, because the alleged acknowledgment of CLAIMANT’S 1979 and 1982 loans occurred . . . Section 95.04 provides: An acknowledgment of, or promise to pay, a debt barred by a statute of limitations . . . Section 95.04, applicable to this case, have not been met by the CLAIMANT. . . . Section 95.04. . . .

B. WASSIL, v. GILMOUR,, 465 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Sec. 95.04, Fla. Stat. (1981). . . . .

G. GLASS, M. Jr. v. J. A. CAMARA,, 369 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . See Sections 95.04 and 95.051, Florida Statutes (1977); Section 95.031, Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.) . . .

SEBASTIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. a v. FLORIDA FIRST NATIONAL BANK AT VERO BEACH, G., 345 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 95.04, Florida Statutes (1975) provides “an acknowledgement of . . .a debt barred by a statute . . .

REED, III, v. A. RHODES, 422 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . In 1956, four portable classrooms were added to Parkwood (’55: 95.04%, +25; ’56: 98.5%, -53), and four . . .

KITCHENS, v. D. KITCHENS, F. G. S. F., 142 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . the note and mortgage constitute a writing, thus meeting the requirements of the Statute of Frauds, § 95.04 . . .

WHALE HARBOR SPA, INC. v. E. WOOD, W., 266 F.2d 953 (5th Cir. 1959)

. . . . § 95.04. . . .

In COMMUNITY POWER LIGHT CO., 33 F. Supp. 901 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

. . . present Preferred stockholders (5 new shares for each of 68,962 present shares)............ 344,810 95.04 . . .

YOUNG v. NICHOLSON RIGGS NAT. BANK,, 107 F.2d 177 (D.C. Cir. 1939)

. . . Nicholson, her mother, the defendant, and a balance of $95.04 in a savings account to the credit of said . . .

v., 22 B.T.A. 1153 (B.T.A. 1931)

. . . Heddles, Reeds,” $20,005.92; “Card Clothing,” $179.52; “Belting & Rope,” $612.58; “Identified Labor,” $95.04 . . .

OGDEN CITY v. ARMSTRONG, 168 U.S. 224 (U.S. 1897)

. . . Artn- ■ strong, $95.04; Mathias Biel, $63 ; Joseph Clark, $48 ; Samuel Chapman, for the William Chapman . . .

ELIAS E. BARNES ET AL. v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMUEL J. RITCHIE v. THE SAME, 22 Ct. Cl. 366 (Ct. Cl. 1887)

. . . at 84.48 ............................ 168.96 30. 1 “ 16'-18' “ .................................... 95.04 . . .

HENRY GANTZ, TO THE USE OF JAMES A. BOYD, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 18 Ct. Cl. 569 (Ct. Cl. 1883)

. . . connections, at 1.80. 37 80 5 manholes, 19-J- feet deep, 105.60 each.. 528 00 1 manhole, 17-J-feet deep, 95.04 . . .