Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 95.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 95.14 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 95.14

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS
Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 95.14
95.14 Real property actions; limitation upon action founded upon title.No cause of action or defense to an action founded on the title to real property, or to rents or service from it, shall be maintained unless:
(1) The person prosecuting the action or making the defense, or under whose title the action is prosecuted or the defense is made, or the ancestor, predecessor, or grantor of the person, was seized or possessed of the real property within 7 years before commencement of the action; or
(2) Title to the real property was derived from the United States or the state within 7 years before commencement of the action. The time under this subsection shall not begin to run until the conveyance of the title from the state or the United States.
History.s. 3, ch. 1869, 1872; RS 1288; GS 1719; RGS 2933; CGL 4653; s. 10, ch. 74-382.

F.S. 95.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 95.14


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 95.14
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 95.14.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

JENKINS, v. BALTIMORE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT,, 862 F. Supp. 2d 427 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . Williams scored a 95.68 and Stafford scored a 95.14. (Id.). . . .

In L. MILLER, L. v. J., 325 B.R. 539 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . If the plan is paid off early at the 12th month, however, the present value increases to $95.14, which . . .

In MURPHY, Jr. d b a s In, 327 B.R. 760 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2005)

. . . If the plan is paid off early at the 12th month, however, the present value increases to $95.14, which . . .

ESTATE OF JOHNSTON, v. TPE HOTELS, INC. a, 719 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Thus sections 95.12 and 95.14 are inapplicable because they govern actions to recover real property. . . .

ORTIZ, v. STEWART,, 149 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 1998)

. . . is barred because Ortiz procedurally defaulted on one set of claims (95.4, 95.5, 95.6, 95.9, 95.13, 95.14 . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. EX Ex,, 645 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 95.14, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

COMERICA TRUST COMPANY OF FLORIDA, N. A. No. v. MONROE COUNTY,, 622 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 95.14, Fla.Stat. (1989); § 689.18(4), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 100.00% 15,717 87.50% 2,190 12.19% 9 0.05% 19 0.11% 27 0.15% Franklin County 27,814 100.00% 26,463 95.14% . . .

SIERRA MEDICAL CENTER, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 902 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . As a new provider, Sierra could recover costs of $103.51 instead of $95.14 per day for its third cost . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, v. R. STEVENS, 472 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See also, § 95.14, Fla.Stat.; 2 Fla.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 60. . . .

CRIGGER v. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION,, 436 So. 2d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . In Florida the legislature, by acts now embodied in sections 95.14 and 95.16, Florida Statutes (1981) . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, v. J. DONOVAN,, 704 F.2d 288 (6th Cir. 1983)

. . . . §• 95.14(b)(3). . . . of Labor has broad power to change the regulations and the states have accepted money subject to § 95.14 . . .

In AMPICILLIN ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 526 F. Supp. 494 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . Lane, Aitken, Dunner & Ziems 117.00 Freeman, Roth, Freeman & Salzman 126.00 Kohn, Milstein & Cohen 95.14 . . .

HAPAG- LLOYD, A. G. v. L. LEVINE d b a, 473 F. Supp. 991 (N.D. Ill. 1979)

. . . entitled to the freight charges and has already accepted defendant’s offer of judgment in the amount of $95.14 . . .

E. WALKER v. UNITED STATES, 428 F.2d 1229 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

. . . . § 95.12 and § 95.14, F.S.A. provide that no action may be brought to recover real property unless the . . .

SARAH E. WALKER v. THE UNITED STATES, 192 Ct. Cl. 805 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

. . . . § 95.12 and § 95.14 provide that no action may be brought to recover real property unless the plaintiff . . .

GRIZZARD v. CITY OF LEESBURG,, 34 Fla. Supp. 58 (Lake Cty. Cir. Ct. 1970)

. . . statute of limitations, §95.11, F.S., as to the claim for damages; (5) the statute of limitations, §95.14 . . .

MOORE, v. MUSA D. M., 198 So. 2d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . The court further found that the statute of limitations, specifically §§ 95.12 and 95.14, Fla.Stat., . . . adverse possession under color of title and that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, § 95.14 . . . Section 95.14 reads as follows: “No cause of action or defense to an action founded upon the title to . . .

KELLEY v. CITY OF COCOA, a, 188 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . . § 95.14, 54 C.J.S. Limitations of Actions § 125. . . .

ATLANTIC LAND IMPROVEMENT CO. v. DAVIS, 70 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1954)

. . . that said plaintiffs are barred from the bringing of this proceeding under the provisions of Section 95.14 . . .

CRANE CO. v. COLUMBUS CONST. CO., 73 F. 984 (7th Cir. 1896)

. . . November 3,1890, 8-inch pipe had been delivered at different stations along the line, to the amount of 95.14 . . .