The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 95.22. 3. . . .
. . . least the same proportion as passers, Hispanics achieved a nominal passing score at between 82.77% and 95.22% . . .
. . . In the Preliminary Results, Commerce expressed its intention to apply a dumping margin of 95.22 percent . . . The 95.22 percent rate was calculated by taking the weighted-average margin of the only two products . . . Commerce Properly Rejected the 95.22 Percent Weighted-Average Margin. . . . National Candle argues that Commerce’s preliminary determination to apply a margin of 95.22 percent as . . . According to National Candle, in light of this subsequent determination by Commerce, the 95.22 percent . . .
. . . In the Preliminary Results, Commerce expressed its intention to apply a dumping margin of 95.22 percent . . . The 95.22 percent rate was calculated by taking the weighted-average margin of the only two products . . . Commerce Properly Rejected the 95.22 Percent Weighted-Average Margin. . . . National Candle argues that Commerce’s preliminary determination to apply a margin of 95.22 percent as . . . According to National Candle, in light of this subsequent determination by Commerce, the 95.22 percent . . .
. . . 5.5 and pH 7.0 pH 5.5 pH 7.0 Day of Test 70°C 80°C 70°C 80°C 0 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1 98.53 95.22 . . .
. . . clerk in order for Michelle Walters to be released from jail; • $12.00 finance charge on the loan; • $95.22 . . .
. . . Usinor owns 70% of Dillinger’s parent, German holding company Dillinger Hyutte Saarstahl AG, which has a 95.22% . . .
. . . Usinor owns 70% of Dillinger’s parent, German holding company Dillinger Hyutte Saarstahl AG, which has a 95.22% . . .
. . . contributed independently to the final disability.” 4 Arthur Larson, Law of Workmens’ Compensation § 95.22 . . .
. . . Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's finding which quieted title to Lots 5 and 6 in Mary pursuant to section 95.22 . . . Plaintiffs argue, and we agree, that section 95.22 is not applicable to the instant case. . . . third party, who was joined as a defendant at the trial court level, is not a party to this appeal. . 95.22 . . .
. . . father’s death; and we further held that the action was not defeated or barred by Sections 95.21 or 95.22 . . .
. . . Such deeds of distribution may also benefit the record title as the basis for limitations (see §§ 95.22 . . .
. . . .-32(2) but § 95.22(b)(2), which provides: “(b) Evaluation, referral, and records. . . . Section 95.22, however, ostensibly governs participation in community treatment programs, rather than . . . Nevertheless, since § 95.22(b)(2) is substantially identical to § 95.32(2), the Court has treated plaintiff . . .
. . . purchased certain household goods and furnishings for a cash price of $1,587.00 plus sales tax of $95.22 . . .
. . . Appellee next contends that this action is barred by § 95.22, Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Referring to subsection (2) of § 95.22 above, it is readily seen that § 95.22 specifically does not apply . . .
. . . 288,673 52.34 (21,877) * 1962_ 442, 746 60. 09 36, 373 * 1963_ 495, 940 86. 19 22, 305 1964_ 563,228 95.22 . . .
. . . The trial judge held appellant’s claim to have been barred by F.S. 95.22, F.S.1969 and F.S. 95.23, F.S . . . F.S. 95.22, F.S.1969, provides: “When any person owning land, or any interest in lands in Florida, shall . . .
. . . The defendant’s argument that her title is perfected by reason of either § 95.22 or § 95.23 is untenable . . .
. . . . § 95.22 as a bar to the appellee plaintiffs action: F.S. § 95.22, F.S.A. reads as follows: “95.22 Limitation . . . Laws of Florida, Section 4659, would be applicable to the instant case instead of the present F.S. § 95.22 . . . We therefore hold that neither F.S. § 95.22, F.S.A., nor its predecessor Section 4659, Compiled General . . . Sections 95.22 and 95.23, F.S.A. . . . . § 95.22, F.S.A. [4659 C.G.L. 1927] and the Supreme Court, as to F.S. § 95.23, F.S.A. [4660 and 4661 . . .
. . . See 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, Section 95.22, p. 474 and annotation entitled “Limitations—Contracting . . .
. . . Trans-Alaska forwarded to Beech Acceptance Corporation, Inc., the sum of $5,000.00 together with “a check for $95.22 . . . paid on termination, in the amount of $5,000.00, was paid by Trans-Alaska, together with payment of $95.22 . . .
. . . . § 95.22], operate as bar to the recovery by the complainants.” . . .
. . . . § 95.22 [F.S.A.] which contains a provision to the effect that the seven year statute of limitations . . .
. . . defendant was acting contrary to the probabilities of the case and to good business sense in paying $95.22 . . .
. . . the redetermination of deficiencies in income and profits taxes for 1920 and 1921, in the amounts of $95.22 . . .
. . . plaintiff, and against the defendant, for the sum of $29,335.37 damages, and for costs of suit, taxed at $95.22 . . .