Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 95.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 95.35 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 95.35

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS
Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 95.35
95.35 Termination of contracts to purchase real estate in which there is no maturity date.Whenever:
(1) Any person contracts by written agreement to purchase real property before July 1, 1972, and the final maturity of the obligation is not ascertainable from the record of the contract, or accepts an assignment of such a contract, but
(2) Even though the existence of the contract or assignment appears from the record of the instrument or by reference to it in another recorded instrument, such person has not recorded a deed to the property or a judgment recognizing the person’s rights to the property and is not in actual possession of the property as defined in s. 95.16, then

the person and those claiming under the person shall have no further interest in the property by virtue of the contract or assignment. In these circumstances, the record of the contract or assignment, or other record reference to either, shall no longer constitute actual or constructive notice to any person acquiring any interest in the property.

History.s. 1, ch. 24292, 1947; s. 19, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 528, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 95.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 95.35


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 95.35
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 95.35.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DOE NO. v. NUR- UL- ISLAM ACADEMY, INC. a Ul- a, 217 So. 3d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . statutes of limitations: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

B. BROWN, J. L. v. NATIONSCREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, N. A., 32 So. 3d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . 95.051(l)(f) provides: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U. S., 499 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . under $50,000 were 86.9 percent; those under $100,000 were 90.75 percent; and those under $500,000 were 95.35 . . .

SOUTH MOTOR COMPANY OF DADE COUNTY, a d b a v. DOKTORCZYK,, 957 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . in pertinent part: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

CADLE COMPANY, v. McCARTHA,, 920 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . , Florida Statutes: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, v. J. PATAFIO, JR., 829 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 95.051 provides: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

S. CUILLO, v. McCOY, E., 810 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . 95.051(l)(f) provides: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

HANKEY, v. YARIAN, M. D., 755 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2000)

. . . limitations periods: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

PUTNAM BERKLEY GROUP, INC. a a v. DININ, 734 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . 1997), provides that: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

L. MORSANI, a v. MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL V. M. T. Jr. S. D. S. Jr. W. M. D. a d b a d b a d b a a d b a d b a d b a O d b a L. P. d b a d b a d b a D. F. St. d b a St. L. d b a d b a d b a d b a d b a M. Co. d b a d b a d b a d b a H. d b a MTI Co. d b a R. P. A. d b a M. d b a d b a d b a d b a, 739 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . .— (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except §§ 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is . . .

In T. B. HOME SEWING ENTERPRISES, INC. D. ELLENBERG, v. TULIP PRODUCTION POLYMERICS, INC., 173 B.R. 782 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1993)

. . . defendant on 17 invoices which ranged from 71 to 117 days after the invoice date with an average of 95.35 . . .

ROSEBURG LUMBER COMPANY, v. R. MADIGAN,, 978 F.3d 660 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

. . . with accurately calculated MABR values: Advertised Actual Species MABR/MBF ' MABR/MBF Ponderosa Pine $ 95.35 . . . Bid Premium Final Stumpage Rate/MBF Gov't Estimated Volume Estimated Price Ponderosa Pine $ 0.00 $ 95.35 . . .

DYNALECTRON CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 659 F. Supp. 64 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . the proposals as follows: Tech Score Cost Score Total RCA 70.39 25 95.39 Dynalectron (P) 75.00 20.35 95.35 . . .

K. W. QUAINTANCE, v. M. FOGG, 392 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . .— (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is . . .

W. LANDERS v. L. MILTON,, 370 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1979)

. . . limitations tolled. (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 455 F. Supp. 1223 (N.D. Tex. 1978)

. . . Program Capacity 258 Current Enrollment 6.82% Minority in ’66-67 24.48% “ “ ’67-68 61.05% “ “ ’68-69 95.35% . . . 75%; lies 99.45%; Wheatley 98.87%; Posey 99.18%; Martin 98.41%; Bozeman 95.80%; Parkway 96.84%; Hunt 95.35% . . .

F. CLARK, Jr. v. RICHARDSON,, 431 F. Supp. 105 (D.N.J. 1977)

. . . Another project, showing a figure of 169,600 unemployed, received a scaled value of 95.35. . . .

PETTWAY v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY,, 494 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . For example, just in terms of gross comparisons, 95.35% of the black employees and 36.03% of the white . . .

IDEAL CEMENT COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 263 F. Supp. 594 (D. Colo. 1966)

. . . foregoing are weighted according to tonnage produced per month and the average for the three years is 95.35% . . .

INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY, A CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 169 Ct. Cl. 821 (Ct. Cl. 1965)

. . . -51 and $571.50 for the others, except the M-62) were included for winches, and for hard top cabs ($95.35 . . .

v., 27 Cust. Ct. 255 (Cust. Ct. 1951)

. . . occasioned by reason of the disallowance of an item invoiced as “plus 15% buying commission on $635.67 — $95.35 . . .