The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Misbehavior Report ("MBR") charging him with the following Inmate Rule Violations: 102.10 Threats, 104.13 . . .
. . . charging him with two counts of violent conduct (Rule 104.11), two counts of creating a disturbance (Rule 104.13 . . . the hearing and found Plaintiff guilty of violent conduct (Rule 104.11), creating a disturbance (Rule 104.13 . . .
. . . Sloane was charged with the following violations: 100.11 attempted assault; 104.11 violent conduct; 104.13 . . . I have found you guilty of the charges, 104.11 violent conduct, 104.13 creating a disturbance, 107.10 . . . Sloane was charged with the following violations: 100.11 attempted assault; 104.11 violent conduct; 104.13 . . .
. . . five prison disciplinary rules, including rule 100.13 (fighting); rule 104.11 (violent conduct); rule 104.13 . . .
. . . These unopposed Motions to Seal will be granted pursuant to Local Rules 104.13 and 105.11. . . . .
. . . These unopposed motions will be GRANTED pursuant to Local Rules 104.13 and 105.11. . . . .
. . . AHRN’s unopposed Motion to Seal will be granted pursuant to Local Rules 104.13 and 105.11. . . .
. . . Confidentiality Order requires the simultaneous filing of an interim sealing motion pursuant to Local Rule 104.13 . . .
. . . Stipulated Protective Order governing this case was entered under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) and Local Rule 104.13 . . . R. 104.13; see Stipulated Protective Order § 6.2. . . . R. 104.13 (stating that the burden of justifying a confidentiality designation falls on the designating . . . R. 104.13; Stipulated Protective Order § 6.2. . . . R. 104.13; Stipulated Protective Order § 6.2. The record before me does not do so. III. . . .
. . . determined.” 8 Charles Gordon, Stanley Mailman & Stephen Yale-Loehr, 8 Immigration Law and Procedure, § 104.13 . . .
. . . finds that the proposed confidentiality agreement, particularly as revised, complies with Local Rule 104.13 . . .
. . . charging him with violating DOCS rules 106.10 (failure to follow a direct order); 100.13 (fighting); and 104.13 . . .
. . . See 8 Gordon, Mailman, & Yale-Loehr, Immigration Law and Procedure, § 104.13 (stating that § 1252(b)( . . .
. . . defendants — alleging violation of prison rules 107.20 (lying), 106.10 (disobeying a direct order) and 104.13 . . .
. . . Yale-Loehr, Immigration Law and Procedure § 104.13[3][c], at 104-181 to 104-182 (2003) ("Courts have . . .
. . . inmates to participate in action which may be detrimental to the order of the facility, and prison rule 104.13 . . . violation of prison rule 104.12 but not guilty of creating a disturbance in violation of prison rule 104.13 . . .
. . . . §§ 104.13(b), 104.35(b)(3), 104.42(b)(3) (Department of Education regulations pursuant to the Rehabilitation . . .
. . . See 8 Charles Gordon, Stanley Mailman & Stephen Yale-Loehr, Immigration Law and Procedure § 104.13[4] . . . See 8 Gordon, Mailman & Yale-Loehr, Immigration Law and Procedure § 104.13[4][g][ii] (subsection (f) . . .
. . . Reno, 18 F.Supp.2d 674, 679 (W.D.Tex.1998); 8 Charles Gordon, et al, Immigration Law and Procedure, § 104.13 . . .
. . . Berger, Wein-stein’s Federal Evidence, § 104.13[8] (Joseph M. McLaughlin, ed.,. . . . Ev. 802; see also Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, §§ 104.11[1][a], 104.13[8]. . . .
. . . Plaintiff was charged with violating Prison Rules 104.13, Creating a Disturbance; 107.10, Interference . . . 1994, an IMR was issued by Defendant O’Connor against Plaintiff, charging him with violating Rules 104.13 . . . found guilty of violating Rule 106.10, Refusing a Direct Order and found not guilty of violating Rules 104.13 . . . Plaintiff with violating Rules 106.10, Refusing a Direct Order; 109.12, Movement Regulation Violation; 104.13 . . . Refusing a Direct Order and 124.16, Messhall Serving/Seating Violation, and not guilty of violating Rules 104.13 . . .
. . . . § 104.13(b); 45 C.F.R. § 84.13(b); cf. 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(7) (Americans With Disabilities Act). . . .
. . . . § 104.13 (1977); H.R.Rep. 422, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. 23 (1979), reprinted in FEC Legislative History . . .
. . . Franke 104.13 70 7,289.10 Law Students/ 37.13 25 928.25 Paralegals TOTAL $33,601.15 Thus, a total of . . .
. . . , Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence, § 5053 at 259-61 (1977); 10 Moore’s Federal Practice j| 104.13 . . .
. . . Graham, Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence § 5053 at' 259-60 (1977); 10 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 104.13 . . . Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 855, 96 S.Ct. 105, 46 L.Ed.2d 81, 10 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 104.13 . . .
. . . J.), aff’d, 341 U.S. 494, 71 S.Ct. 857, 95 L.Ed. 1137 (1951); 11 Moore’s Federal Practice, supra, § 104.13 . . .
. . . awarding the bank $1,036.70, representing the principal sum with interest; and awarded the Atwells $104.13 . . .