The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 104
ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 104.18

104.18 Casting more than one ballot at any election.—

(1) Except as provided in s. 101.6952, whoever willfully votes more than one ballot at any election commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. In any prosecution under this section, the prosecution may proceed in any jurisdiction in which one of the ballots was willfully cast, and it is not necessary to prove which of the ballots was cast first.

(2) For purposes of this section, the term “votes more than one ballot at any election” means an occurrence of any of the following:

(a) Voting more than once in the same election within a county located within this state.

(b) Voting more than once in the same election by voting in two or more counties located in this state.

(c) Voting more than once in the same election by voting in this state and in one or more other states or territories of the United States.

History.—s. 8, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 8, ch. 65-379; s. 37, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 77-175; s. 4, ch. 2011-162; s. 41, ch. 2023-120.

F.S. 104.18 on Google Scholar

F.S. 104.18 on Casetext

Amendments to 104.18

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 104.18

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S104.18 - FRAUD - CAST MORE THAN ONE BALLOT AT ANY ELECTION - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PROCHROMA TECHS. INC. l v. UNITED STATES,, 60 Fed. Cl. 614 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . PX 104 11166, at 104.17-104.18, 104.26-104.29; Tr. at 647-48. . . .

A. LOVELY, III, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,, 307 F. Supp. 2d 294 (D. Mass. 2004)

. . . . § 104.18(a)(2). . . . modem or by mail in a separate file on a diskette accompanied by a signed certification. 11 C.F.R. § 104.18 . . .

HYNES, v. J. SQUILLACE, N. F., 143 F.3d 653 (2d Cir. 1998)

. . . This includes using insolent, abusive and/or obscene language and gestures”; and (iv) Rule' 104.18, which . . .

UNITED STATES v. VOGT, Jr., 713 F. Supp. 847 (M.D.N.C. 1987)

. . . Defendant “borrowed” the $174,-104.18 from Chardon, N.Y., and represented Chardon in the transaction . . .

L. COMPTON, Jr. v. ALTON STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC., 608 F.2d 96 (4th Cir. 1979)

. . . Using the formula of 560 X $104.18 (double the $52.09) wage claim with allowances) they calculated the . . .

F. O NEILL, v. UNITED STATES, 198 F. Supp. 367 (E.D.N.Y. 1961)

. . . Those figures aggregate $64,598.40, to which was added the sum of $104.18, representing the special tax . . .

v. v., 35 B.T.A. 928 (B.T.A. 1937)

. . . of $185,532.25, and valued the 30,000 shares of stock as of June 30, 1933, at $3,125,433.73, being $104.18 . . . the solemn sworn statement of the president and treasurer of the company gave the stock the value of $104.18 . . .

BRADSTREET COMPANY v. HIGGINS, 112 U.S. 227 (U.S. 1884)

. . . company contained, 1st, a general denial of the allegations of the petition; 2d, a counter-claim of $1,-104.18 . . .