Cases from cite.case.law:

ORANGE COUNTY, v. SINGH,, 268 So. 3d 668 (Fla. 2019)

. . . Furthermore, section 105.09(1), Florida Statutes (2018), states that "[n]o political party or partisan . . .

IN RE KRETCHMAR, PCA, v., 579 B.R. 924 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2018)

. . . Colonial Realty Co., 966 F.2d 57, 58 (2nd Cir. 1992); see also 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 [3] ( . . . Similarly, as summarized in Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 [1][d]: In general, courts have adopted the . . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 [l][d]. . . .

IN RE ADPT DFW HOLDINGS, LLC,, 574 B.R. 87 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Tex. 2011) (citing to 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[1][c] (16th ed. 2010)). . . . But see 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[2][a] (Alan N, Resnick & Henry J. . . . Id. at 248-52, , See, e.g., 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[2][a], ns. 59 & 60 (Alan N. . . .

IN RE A. STEWART P. SE LLC, v. A. P., 571 B.R. 460 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . Similarly, as summarized in Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 [1][d]: In general, courts have adopted the . . .

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION,, 758 F.3d 357 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . from which the claims of creditors of both debtors are satisfied ratably.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . . variety” of tests when assessing whether to grant substantive consolidation. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION,, 758 F.3d 357 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . from which the claims of creditors of both debtors are satisfied ratably.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . . variety” of tests when assessing whether to grant substantive consolidation. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In CITY LOFT HOTEL, LLC, In LLC,, 465 B.R. 428 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2012)

. . . In re Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc., 441 B.R. 470, 487 (Bankr.D.S.C.2010) (citing 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In AHF DEVELOPMENT, LTD., 462 B.R. 186 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . giving rise to a “liberal” view that allows for consolidation more easily. 1 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 105.09 . . . See 1 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 105.09[2][a] (16th ed. 2010). . . . Id. at ¶ 105.09[2][c]. . . . See 1 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 105.09[2][d][iii] (16th ed. 2010). . . .

In GYRO- TRAC USA INC., 441 B.R. 470 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2010)

. . . discretion in determining whether to substantively consolidate bankruptcy cases. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In POLAROID CORPORATION, LLC LLC I LLC LLC LLC LLC LLC, 424 B.R. 446 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2010)

. . . expectations, and rights; and they all impose a heavy burden on the proponent. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . . , especially ¶ 105.09[2][d][iii] (Alan N. . . .

In THE PACIFIC LUMBER CO. LLC, NA, Co. LP, LP, LLC LLC CSG v. LP LLC Co., 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . King et al., Collier on Bankruptcy § 105.09[2] (15th ed. rev.2009), but here, the Indenture Trustee claims . . .

In THE PACIFIC LUMBER CO. LLC, NA, Co. LP, LP, LLC LLC CSG v. LP LLC Co., 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . King et al., Collier on Bankruptcy § 105.09[2] (15th ed. rev.2009), but here, the Indenture Trustee claims . . .

In COLEMAN, 417 B.R. 712 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2009)

. . . consolidation, there is no uniform guideline for determining when it is appropriate, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In MIDWEST AGRI DEVELOPMENT CORP. M. v. MIDWEST AG SERVICES, INC., 369 B.R. 408 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2007)

. . . See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[2][a], pp. 105-91 (Lawrence P. . . .

In AMCO INSURANCE N. A. v. J., 444 F.3d 690 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . divided on whether they may order consolidation of a debtor with a nondebtor.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . . (In re Augie/Restivo Baking Co.), 860 F.2d 515, 518 (2d Cir.1988); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[1 . . .

In AMCO INSURANCE N. A. v. J., 444 F.3d 690 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . divided on whether they may order consolidation of a debtor with a nondebtor.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . . (In re Augie/Restivo Baking Co.), 860 F.2d 515, 518 (2d Cir.1988); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[1 . . .

In OWENS CORNING, a, 419 F.3d 195 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . Accord 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[l][c] (15th rev. ed.2005). . . . .

HALLMARK DEVELOPERS, INC. v. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA,, 386 F. Supp. 2d 1369 (N.D. Ga. 2005)

. . . These census tracts are: 103.01, 103.04, 104, 105.07, 105.08, 105.09, 105.10, 105.11, 105.12, 105.13, . . .

In OWENS CORNING, a, 419 F.3d 195 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . Accord 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[l][c] (15th rev. ed.2005). . . . .

In LISANTI FOODS, INC. M. Jr. v., 329 B.R. 491 (D.N.J. 2005)

. . . see also In re Stone & Webster, Inc., 286 B.R. 532, 539 (Bankr.D.Del.2002); 2 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 105.09 . . .

In FAS MART CONVENIENCE STORES, INC., 320 B.R. 587 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2004)

. . . Augie/Restivo Baking Co., Ltd.), 860 F.2d 515, 518 (2nd Cir.1988) (quoting 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In WORLD ACCESS, INC. LDC, v. WA Co. LLC,, 301 B.R. 217 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2003)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[2][a] (15th ed.2003). . . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[1][d] (15th ed.2003). . . . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[2][a] (15th ed.2003). . . .

In A. BUNKER In P. A. BUNKER P. v. P. PEYTON, In In v. P., 312 F.3d 145 (4th Cir. 2002)

. . . from which the claims of creditors of both debtors are satisfied ratably.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In A. BUNKER In P. A. BUNKER P. v. P. PEYTON, In In v. P., 312 F.3d 145 (4th Cir. 2002)

. . . from which the claims of creditors of both debtors are satisfied ratably.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In THOMAS In A. P. In, 261 B.R. 848 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . Ballard, 65 F.3d at 372; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[3], at 105-103 (15th ed. rev., 1998) In the . . .

In PERMIAN PRODUCERS DRILLING, INC., 263 B.R. 510 (W.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . .”); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09[1][b] (Lawrence P. King ed., 15th ed. revised 2000); J. . . . should have been included since the commencement of the bankruptcy case. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . . Bonham, 229 F.3d at 765-66; 2 CollibR on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 105.09[2]. . . . elements is determinative as to whether substantive consolidation is warranted. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 105.09 . . .

In AFFILIATED FOODS, INC. AF Hy-, 249 B.R. 770 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2000)

. . . consolidation should be ordered, based on the facts of the particular case. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 105.09 . . . See also, Eastgroup Properties, supra; 2 Collier on BaNKruptoy ¶ 105.09[2][b] at 105-94 to 105-96. . . .

GRABOWSKI, v. BANK OF BOSTON, PA,, 997 F. Supp. 130 (D. Mass. 1998)

. . . The remaining $260,-105.09 was transferred into the second account no. 640-17836, discussed below. b. . . .

ZELLER, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, 909 F. Supp. 1518 (N.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 105.09. . . .

L. NIPPER A. D. D. W. v. SMITH R., 39 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 105.09(1) ("No political party or partisan political organization shall endorse, support, or assist . . .

MARTIN, v. N. FEILEN, P. W. W. K. L. R N W. O. D. P. C. L. C. P. A. MARTIN, v. N. FEILEN P. W. W. K. L. R N Co. W. O. D. P. C. K. C. P. A. P. C. L. C. P. A., 965 F.2d 660 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . On January 2, 1982, CRC purchased 105.09 shares from the ESOP by assuming the ESOP’s liability to Central . . .

GEARY, v. RENNE,, 880 F.2d 1062 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 105.09 (West 1982). . . .

WOODEN v. NORRIS, LING, v. NORRIS, SHUSHAN v. NORRIS,, 637 F. Supp. 543 (M.D. Tenn. 1986)

. . . See Policies # 501.02 and 105.09 for the regulations regarding an inmate’s telephone access to attorneys . . . (Exhibit 8, TDOC Policy 105.09). . . .

CONCERNED DEMOCRATS OF FLORIDA v. RENO,, 493 F. Supp. 660 (S.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . . § 105.09, and plaintiffs have acquired the primary relief sought. . . .

CONCERNED DEMOCRATS OF FLORIDA v. RENO,, 458 F. Supp. 60 (S.D. Fla. 1978)

. . . . § 105.09 imper-missibly chills their First Amendment rights to free speech; that it violates their . . . Florida Statute § 105.09 enacted in 1971, punishes by fine and imprisonment any support, endorsement, . . . Stat. § 105.09 violates their rights guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments present this court . . . Florida Statute § 105.09 most assuredly aids the state in maintaining the non-partisan qualities of its . . . Stat. § 105.09 pending the final determination of this case on the merits. . . . .

C. W. REGAN, INC. a v. PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE AND DOUGLAS, C. W. REGAN, INC. a v. F. DIAMOND, t a, 411 F.2d 1379 (4th Cir. 1969)

. . . “Sec. 105.09 AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF INSPECTORS. — Inspectors employed by the Department shall be authorized . . .

CAPUCCIO v. BARBER CO., 148 F. 473 (S.D.N.Y. 1906)

. . . The respondent before paying the freight, it is alleged, deducted £21.11.7, amounting to $105.09 and . . . It is agreed that it amounted to £2158.0.4, paid in advance, on which 1% was ¿21.11.7 or $105.09, the . . . Decree for the libellant for $.105.09, with an order of reference to determine the amounts due for extra . . .