Cases from cite.case.law:

a No. RE J. DECKER, III, 212 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Finally, this conduct violated section 106.071(3), Florida Statutes, which prohibits a candidate for . . .

WORLEY v. K. ROBERTS, 749 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (N.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . concede, that Florida law would prohibit the plaintiffs from airing anonymous advertisements, see § 106.071 . . .

GUETZLOE, v. STATE, 980 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Following the election, the disclosure form required by section 106.071 was filed identifying Guetzloe . . . Mortham, 708 So.2d 929 (Fla.1998), the plaintiffs argued that section 106.071(1), was over-broad and . . .

K. BEARDSLEE, v. FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION,, 962 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 106.071, Fla. Stat. Mrs. . . .

M. GUETZLOE, v. FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION,, 927 So. 2d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 106.071(1) (2003) provided: Each person who makes an independent expenditure with respect to . . . In Doe, the Court declared that every disclosure requirement in section 106.071(1), save for the words . . . The Court stated: To comport with the First Amendment, the last sentence in section 106.071(1) must be . . . The Commission erred in finding that Guetzloe and GCG violated the provisions of section 106.071(1). . . . The final order , of the Commission is reversed as to the violation of section 106.071(1), affirmed as . . .

DOE, v. MORTHAM,, 708 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Section 106.071 requires any person who makes an independent expenditure with respect to any candidate . . . Section 106.071 further provides that any political advertisement paid for by an independent expenditure . . . The majority concludes that is “illogical” to interpret Florida sections 106.071 and 106.144 as imposing . . . (creating § 106.071 and amending § 106.144); eh. 73-128, § 33, at 238, Laws of Fla. . . . Accordingly, I find section 106.143(1) and the part of section 106.071 requiring disclosure of identity . . . Doe filed a complaint in circuit court in February 1996 seeking a declaratory judgment that sections 106.071 . . . To limit Florida sections 106.071 and 106.144 to “political candidates” simply because federal sections . . . CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the Does over-breadth challenge to sections 106.071, 106.148, and . . . We affirm the trial court’s order upholding the facial constitutionality of sections 106.071, 106.143 . . . As noted above, section 106.071(1) provides in relevant part: Any political advertisement paid for by . . .

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, v. FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION,, 658 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . require heightened scrutiny under Buckley, because they did not contain the disclaimer required by 106.071 . . .

In JUDICIAL DITCH NO. IN FREEBORN AND MOWER COUNTIES, 87 F. Supp. 198 (D. Minn. 1949)

. . . . §§ 106.071, 106.081. . . .