The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . She projects a stabilized ADR of $106.21 and a stabilized RevPAR of $75.41. . . .
. . . (7/1/09) 257.80 Robert McGorty (7/1/09) 484.60 Ron Castle (7/1/09) 244.40 Tracy Franklin (8/24/09) 106.21 . . . McGorty (7/1/09) 124.60 Ron Castle (7/1/09) 229.00 Tracy Franklin (7/1/09) 129.20 Ron Castle (8/24/09) 106.21 . . .
. . . See, e.g., 16 Moore & Pratt, Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.21[1] (3d ed.1998) (collecting cases). . . .
. . . 2004, finding probable cause to believe that Jennings violated sections 106.07(5), 106.19(l)(b), and 106.21 . . .
. . . . §§ 106.21 (admissions), 106.42 (textbooks), 106.51 (employment) (1999). . . .
. . . . §§ 106.21 (admissions), 106.42 (textbooks), 106.51 (employment) (1999). . . .
. . . . §§ 106.21(b)(2) (prohibits tests for admission which have disproportionately adverse effect, unless . . .
. . . For example, the provision governing admissions procedures, 34 CFR § 106.21(b)(2), prohibits a recipient . . .
. . . . §§ 106.21(b)(2), 106.21(c)(2)-(3), 106.22, 106.-23(b), 106.34(d), 106.37(a)(2), 106.38(a)(2), 106.- . . .
. . . . § 106.21(2)), how Hillsdale may use its own funds to aid the students (34 C.F.R. § 106.37), the students . . .
. . . denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient . . . .” 34 CFR § 106.21 . . .
. . . Appellee further contends that the provisions of § 106.18 and § 106.21 of the Campaign Financing Act . . . Sections 106.18 and 106.21 provide respectively: 106.18 When a candidate’s name to be omitted from ballot . . . reports required by § 106.07 have been filed in accordance with the provisions of § 106.07 or § 106.20. 106.21 . . . appears that the legislature was attempting to fill a gap in the law through enactment of § 106.18 and § 106.21 . . .
. . . party plaintiff The California Company for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4,650.00 and expenses of $106.21 . . . court rendered a judgment allowing The California Company to recover $4,650.00 in attorneys’ fees and $106.21 . . .
. . . the return as introduced, was the claim filed July 23, 1952, signed by Taxpayers seeking refund of $106.21 . . . This claim specifically identified and referred to the 1951 return and the requested refund ($106.21) . . .
. . . In its returns for 1919 and 1920, the petitioner claimed deductions of $10,-106.21 and $15,604.65, respectively . . .