Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 106.21 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 106.21 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 106.21

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 106
CAMPAIGN FINANCING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 106.21
106.21 Certificates of election not to be issued upon conviction.
(1) If a successful candidate is convicted of violating s. 106.19(1) prior to the issuance of his or her certificate of election, such certificate shall not be issued, and a vacancy shall be declared and filled as provided by law.
(2) If a successful candidate is convicted of violating s. 106.19(1) subsequent to the issuance of a certificate of election but prior to taking office, such certificate shall be rescinded by the issuing body and declared void, and a vacancy in office shall exist and be filled as provided by law.
History.s. 21, ch. 73-128; s. 57, ch. 77-175; s. 650, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 106.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 106.21 on Casetext

Amendments to 106.21


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 106.21
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 106.21.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE EM LODGINGS, LLC,, 580 B.R. 803 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . She projects a stabilized ADR of $106.21 and a stabilized RevPAR of $75.41. . . .

UNITED STATES GONZALEZ, v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA,, 761 F. Supp. 2d 442 (W.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . (7/1/09) 257.80 Robert McGorty (7/1/09) 484.60 Ron Castle (7/1/09) 244.40 Tracy Franklin (8/24/09) 106.21 . . . McGorty (7/1/09) 124.60 Ron Castle (7/1/09) 229.00 Tracy Franklin (7/1/09) 129.20 Ron Castle (8/24/09) 106.21 . . .

ACHTMAN, H. A. S. v. KIRBY, McINERNEY SQUIRE, LLP LLP,, 464 F.3d 328 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., 16 Moore & Pratt, Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.21[1] (3d ed.1998) (collecting cases). . . .

JENNINGS, v. FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION,, 932 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . 2004, finding probable cause to believe that Jennings violated sections 106.07(5), 106.19(l)(b), and 106.21 . . .

PEDERSON v. LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J., 213 F.3d 858 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 106.21 (admissions), 106.42 (textbooks), 106.51 (employment) (1999). . . .

PEDERSON v. LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A. Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J. v. E. C. D. L. C. A. V. E. M. A Jr. Jr. Jr. H. Jr. L. S. III R. J., 201 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 106.21 (admissions), 106.42 (textbooks), 106.51 (employment) (1999). . . .

WOMEN PRISONERS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 877 F. Supp. 634 (D.D.C. 1994)

. . . . §§ 106.21(b)(2) (prohibits tests for admission which have disproportionately adverse effect, unless . . .

SHARIF, SALAHUDDIN, v. NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, 709 F. Supp. 345 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . For example, the provision governing admissions procedures, 34 CFR § 106.21(b)(2), prohibits a recipient . . .

MABRY, v. STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION Dr. Jr. Sr., 813 F.2d 311 (10th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 106.21(b)(2), 106.21(c)(2)-(3), 106.22, 106.-23(b), 106.34(d), 106.37(a)(2), 106.38(a)(2), 106.- . . .

HILLSDALE COLLEGE, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE,, 696 F.2d 418 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 106.21(2)), how Hillsdale may use its own funds to aid the students (34 C.F.R. § 106.37), the students . . .

NORTH HAVEN BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BELL, SECRETARY OF EDUCATION,, 456 U.S. 512 (U.S. 1982)

. . . denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient . . . .” 34 CFR § 106.21 . . .

STATE v. W. ZIMMERMAN,, 370 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Appellee further contends that the provisions of § 106.18 and § 106.21 of the Campaign Financing Act . . . Sections 106.18 and 106.21 provide respectively: 106.18 When a candidate’s name to be omitted from ballot . . . reports required by § 106.07 have been filed in accordance with the provisions of § 106.07 or § 106.20. 106.21 . . . appears that the legislature was attempting to fill a gap in the law through enactment of § 106.18 and § 106.21 . . .

C. WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA COMPANY, 289 F. Supp. 376 (E.D. La. 1968)

. . . party plaintiff The California Company for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4,650.00 and expenses of $106.21 . . . court rendered a judgment allowing The California Company to recover $4,650.00 in attorneys’ fees and $106.21 . . .

E. MOORE H. v. UNITED STATES, 254 F.2d 213 (5th Cir. 1958)

. . . the return as introduced, was the claim filed July 23, 1952, signed by Taxpayers seeking refund of $106.21 . . . This claim specifically identified and referred to the 1951 return and the requested refund ($106.21) . . .

s,, 7 B.T.A. 737 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . In its returns for 1919 and 1920, the petitioner claimed deductions of $10,-106.21 and $15,604.65, respectively . . .