Cases from cite.case.law:

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, GATOR LODGE v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE,, 148 So. 3d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . of the majority opinion, which holds that a compliance review hearing is unavailable under section 112.534 . . . At issue is the remedial scope of section 112.534, which is within the “bill of rights” for law enforcement . . . Section 112.534 reflects an overall purpose of providing law enforcement and correctional officers under . . . Portions of section 112.534 support the conclusion that a key purpose of the compliance review process . . . See § 112.534(l)(g), Fla. Stat. . . . issues of first impression concerning the availability of compliance review hearings under section 112.534 . . . As to Officer B, the trial court reasoned that the remedy provided in section 112.534 is not available . . . (amending section 112.534). A. . . . We recognize that, by construing section 112.534 to apply only to alleged violations occurring during . . . Compare § 112.534, Fla. . . .

PEREIRA, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 53 So. 3d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 112.534(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

McQUADE, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 51 So. 3d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Specifically, section 112.534(1), Florida Statutes (2008), provides the following remedy for all violations . . . The Third District held that the officer was not entitled to damages because section 112.534, which was . . . For this reason, the Cosgrove court held that section 112.534 was “no more than a vehicle for enforcing . . . Because the version of section 112.534 in effect in 2008 still provided only for injunc-tive relief through . . . Nevertheless, based on the plain language of section 112.534 and the limitations on the Commission’s . . .

KING, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, G. C. M., 650 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 112.534 makes it clear that injunctive relief is the only remedy for violations of § 112.532. . . .

F. BAILEY v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,, 659 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 112.534. . . . Defendants correctly point out that section 112.534 is the exclusive remedy for violations of section . . . The court held that the officer’s sole remedy was through section 112.534 and, therefore, ordered that . . .

D. McRAE, v. DOUGLAS,, 644 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Police Officers’ Bill of Rights — Count II Sections 112.531 — 112.534, Florida Statutes (1989), referred . . . ’s claim) a law enforcement officer, to be entitled to the procedures set forth in sections 112.531-112.534 . . . the statute_ A corrections officer appointed by a sheriff is not within the ambit of sections 112.531-112.534 . . . Sections 112.531-112.534 were amended in 1993 to include “all law enforcement officers and correctional . . . against an employer agency for violation of section 112.532 is injunctive relief provided for in section 112.534 . . .

SYLVESTER, v. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 584 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Additionally, section 112.534 provides injunctive relief to officers in cases where the employing agency . . . against an employer agency for violation of section 112.532 is the injunction provision of section 112.534 . . . Fla. 4th DCA 1982), decision approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla.1983), this court recognized that section 112.534 . . .

Z. KAMENESH, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a SIS E. B., 772 F. Supp. 583 (S.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . Florida Statutes § 112.534 expressly sets forth the remedies available for violations of § 112.532. . . . The sole remedy provided for in § 112.534 is injunctive relief. . . . Section 112.534 reads: Failure to Comply If any agency employing law enforcement officers or correctional . . .

C. KELLY, v. S. GILL,, 544 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Under the reasoning of the trial court, to allow investigators the benefits of sections 112.532 and 112.534 . . . Section 112.534 specifies that if an agency fails to comply with Part VI, an injured officer may apply . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, a v. M. COSGROVE,, 516 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . noncompliance with Section 112.532, Florida Statutes (1983), is injunctive relief as provided in Section 112.534 . . . Section 112.534 is the only remedy provision of Part VI of Chapter 112, and thus the only express remedy . . . Clearly, Section 112.534 provides only for a suit for an injunction, not for an action for damages. . . . We thus think that the correct construction of Section 112.534 is that given it by our sister court in . . . In the present case, neither before nor after the enactment of Section 112.534, Florida Statutes, was . . .

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, v. LITTERAL,, 446 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . included her claim for rights as a civil servant in her complaint for injunction pursuant to Section 112.534 . . . officer, this court has held that an injunction compelling reinstatement will not lie under Section 112.534 . . . Appellants sought as an alternative to mandamus, injunctive relief, in reliance on Section 112.534. . . . 112.534] and to compel performance of the duties established “by this part,” but this part does not . . . We hold that appellee was not a law enforcement officer, and had no rights under Sections 112.531-112.534 . . .

MIGLIORE v. CITY OF LAUDERHILL,, 415 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Appellants sought as an alternative to mandamus, injunctive relief, in reliance on Section 112.534. . . .

BEMBANASTE, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, a D., 394 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . does not disclose that appellant ever sought timely enforcement of those rights pursuant to Section 112.534 . . . Section 112.534, Florida Statutes (1977). . . . . Section 112.534, Florida Statutes (1977). . . . .

CITY OF HALLANDALE C. v. S. INGLIMA, 346 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Definitions. 112.532 Law enforcement officers’ rights. 112.533 Receipt and processing of complaints. 112.534 . . . History. — s. 3, ch. 74-274. 112.534 Failure to comply. — If any agency employing law enforcement officers . . .

C. EVANS, v. HARDCASTLE,, 339 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The trial judge held that Sections 112.531-112.534, Florida Statutes (1975), which afford certain procedural . . .

M. JOHNSON, v. WILSON,, 336 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Florida, referred to as the Police Officers’ Bill of Rights, and subsequently enacted as Sections 112.531-112.534 . . .

SCHRANK, v. BLISS,, 412 F. Supp. 28 (M.D. Fla. 1976)

. . . Sec. 112.534 (Supp.1974) authorizes the Florida Attorney General to seek injunctive relief in the state . . .

LONGO v. CITY OF HALLANDALE,, 42 Fla. Supp. 53 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1975)

. . . failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under §4 of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights, §112.534 . . .