Cases from cite.case.law:

E. O BOYLE v. TOWN OF GULF STREAM, C. A. O, 257 So. 3d 1036 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . inspection, copying, and photographing of the requested records after a hearing held pursuant to section 119.11 . . .

STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE OF SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. LLC, ABC, LLC, LLC, s, 251 So. 3d 205 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 119.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). Klingensmith, J., concurs. . . .

N. PERREAULT, v. STATE, 203 So. 3d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . for example, from an action to enforce an obligation to produce public records pursuant to section 119.11 . . .

KLINE, v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA,, 200 So. 3d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 119.11(1), Florida Statutes (2015), provides: “Whenever an action is filed to enforce the provisions . . . The plain language of section 119.11(1) requires the trial court to conduct a hearing on actions seeking . . . We direct the court on remand to conduct a hearing as required by section 119.11(1), and to resolve any . . .

HERBITS, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 197 So. 3d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Herbits’s lawsuit also sought an expedited hearing pursuant to section 119.11(1) of the Florida Statutes . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, JACKSONVILLE POLICE FIRE PENSION FUND, v. W. LEE,, 189 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 119.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . critical role in the enforcement of the Public Records Act, as is reflected in the title of section 119.11 . . . — “Accelerated hearing; immediate compliance.” § 119.11, Fla. . . . throughout chapter 119 as being brought “to enforce the provisions” of chapter 119. §§ 119.07(l)(h), 119.11 . . .

BARFIELD, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE,, 171 So. 3d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion requesting an immediate hearing pursuant to § 119.11 . . .

CONSUMER RIGHTS, LLC, v. UNION COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 159 So. 3d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . At the accelerated hearing held pursuant to section 119.11, Florida Statutes, the plaintifRappellant’ . . .

VANCE, v. STATE, 152 So. 3d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . we find that its order to show cause is not a departure from the essential requirements of section 119.11 . . .

A. CHMIELEWSKI J. v. CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH, a, 161 So. 3d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 119.11. . . .

CLAY COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, v. CLAY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 144 So. 3d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . CCEA requested an immediate hearing on its complaint, as provided for in section 119.11(1), Florida Statutes . . . Further, CCEA correctly observes that a hearing should have taken place immediately under section 119.11 . . . Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal and remand for an immediate hearing under section 119.11 . . .

INGRAM, v. STATE, 164 So. 3d 676 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . compel as a petition for writ of mandamus; and (2) failed to have a hearing as required by section 119.11 . . . court is required to “set an immediate hearing, giving the case priority over other pending cases.” § 119.11 . . .

CLAUDIO, v. CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT, VOLUSIA COUNTY,, 128 So. 3d 830 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The “accelerated hearing” refers to the provision in the public records law, section 119.11, Florida . . . that the filing of a petition for accelerated hearing is the filing of a civil action under section 119.11 . . . of a “petition for accelerated hearing” is not sufficient to commence a civil action under section 119.11 . . . See § 119.11(4), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

E. REEVES, v. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE,, 110 So. 3d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 119.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2009); Woodfaulk v. State, 935 So.2d 1225, 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). . . .

J. LASSITER, v. D. MARTIN,, 99 So. 3d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . to accelerated consideration and case priority over other pending cases in accordance with section 119.11 . . .

MATOS, v. OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,, 80 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . the petition for writ of mandamus requiring the court to set an immediate hearing pursuant to section 119.11 . . . court on June 13, 2011, seeking to enforce his right to request public documents pursuant to section 119.11 . . . Section 119.11(1) requires the court to set “an immediate hearing, giving the case priority over other . . .

L. J. JOHNSON, v. L. JARVIS, Jr., 74 So. 3d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Although an accelerated hearing on the complaint was scheduled under section 119.11, Florida Statutes . . .

LAWSON, v. STATE, 35 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 119.11, Fla. Stat. (2009); Roesch v. . . .

BAGGETT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 34 So. 3d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 119.11, Fla. Stat. (2009); Woodfaulk v. State, 935 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). . . .

DEAS, v. STATE, 985 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 119.11(1), Florida Statutes, provides: “Whenever an action is filed to enforce the provisions . . .

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY, E. Sr. v. H. COLBY,, 976 So. 2d 31 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 119.11, Fla. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . departed from the essential requirements of the law in failing to have a hearing as is required by section 119.11 . . .

OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOR THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, v. GONZALEZ,, 953 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Office of the State Attorney make the records available within forty-eight hours pursuant to section 119.11 . . .

WOODFAULK, v. STATE, 935 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . immediate compliance with his public records request from the state attorney’s office pursuant to section 119.11 . . . Woodfaulk alleged in his petition for an accelerated hearing pursuant to section 119.11 that he received . . . Section 119.11 places no specific requirements on the party requesting the record to obtain an accelerated . . . chapter, the court shall set an immediate hearing, giving the case priority over other pending cases.” § 119.11 . . . Woodfaulk’s petition triggered the requirement that the court set an immediate hearing. § 119.11(1). . . .

SOUTHERN COATINGS, INC. v. CITY OF TAMARAC,, 916 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The trial court held an eviden-tiary hearing pursuant to section 119.11, Florida Statutes, on the public . . .

By- v., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 1827 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . Reg. 38,170, 38,173 (ITA Sept. 27, 1984) (final determination) (weighted-average margin of 119.11 sufficient . . .

A. GRACE, v. JENNE,, 855 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . the sheriff denied appellant’s request for public records, appellant filed this action under section 119.11 . . .

LAMB ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 58 Fed. Cl. 106 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . With the exception of invoice No. 024436 from Coneseo for $119.11, it is uncontested that none of the . . . Lamb attached Coneseo invoice No. 001466 for $777.21 and invoice No. 024436 for $119.11 to Progress Billing . . . Lamb claims that invoice No. 024436 for $119.11 was paid C.O.D. . . . As to Conesco, Lamb contends that if the defendant paid Conesco $119.11 for invoice No. 024436, it did . . .

JAMES, v. LOXAHATCHEE GROVES WATER CONTROL DISTRICT,, 820 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . case, this court granted mandamus and ordered the trial court to set a hearing pursuant to section 119.11 . . .

R. MARTIN, v. KRISCHER,, 783 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 119.11, Fla.Stat. (2000); see also Weeks v. Golden, 764 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). . . .

MEYERS v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,, 754 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Appellants also sought an accelerated hearing pursuant to section 119.11, Florida Statutes (1997). . . .

A. MINTUS, v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, L., 711 So. 2d 1359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the request of Plaintiff for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directed to Defendants pursuant to § 119.11 . . .

J. SHEA, v. COCHRAN, 680 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . adequate legal remedy for expeditiously obtaining relief pursuant to the Public Records Act, section 119.11 . . . Section 119.11 provides for an accelerated hearing so that the trial court can determine whether or not . . .

A. J. I. J. C. C. F. C. M. C. B. C. A. C. O. R. E. R. J. R. K. K. R. K. S. K. S. K. L. L. T. S. F. S. S. T. L. T. J. T. T. T. A. K. A. R. A. T. C. B. C. B. J. N. M. B. J. F. AND N. F. v. TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, S., 605 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Moreover, judicial enforcement of the public records law is implicitly authorized by sections 119.11( . . . Cannella too acknowledges the authority conferred by this section: “[sjection 119.11 provides for an . . . In construing section 119.11, to permit actions both to compel the custodian to disclose records and . . . Sections 119.11(1) and (3), Florida Statutes (1989), provide: (1) Whenever an action is filed to enforce . . .

LOCKE, v. M. HAWKES, FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, v. I. GORDON,, 595 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1992)

. . . When Locke failed to produce the records to Hawkes’ satisfaction, Hawkes filed suit to enforce section 119.11 . . . Section 119.11, Florida Statutes (1987), provides: (1) Whenever an action is filed to enforce the provisions . . .

SALVADOR v. E. FENNELLY,, 593 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . mandamus an order directing the trial court to set their action for immediate hearing pursuant to section 119.11 . . . counsel to file memoranda concerning the constitutionality of the operative statutory subsection, section 119.11 . . . LAW Section 119.11(1) provides: “Whenever an action is filed to enforce the provisions of this chapter . . . Section 119.11(1), Florida Statutes, dates back to the laws of 1975. . . . sought an order (writ) compelling the assigned judge to hold the “immediate hearing” required by section 119.11 . . . Properly understood, the immediate hearing called for by section 119.11(1) is, in reality, a trial on . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, L. v. BRITISH- AMERICAN CORPORATION, a a a a, 755 F. Supp. 1314 (E.D.N.C. 1991)

. . . May 1988 = 97.54%/14 = 6.967% . 193.951.84 New principal. 2,977,816.32 AIR 5 May 1988-5 May 1989 = 119.11% . . .

M. HAWKES, v. LOCKE,, 559 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . When Locke failed to produce the records, Hawkes filed suit to enforce section 119.11 of the Public Records . . .

DANIELS, v. BRYSON, 548 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See §§ 119.07(2)(bMd), 119.11, 119.12, Fla. Stat. (1987). . . .

FLORIDA SOCIETY OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS, INC. v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AT T GTE, 543 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Judicial enforcement of the Public Records Law is implicitly authorized by section 119.11(1), which provides . . .

DOWNS, v. Ed AUSTIN,, 522 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Downs’ second cause of action sought a writ of mandamus under section 119.11, Florida Statutes (1981) . . .

CAMPUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CRISER,, 19 Fla. Supp. 2d 97 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1986)

. . . witnesses and oral argument submitted by counsel for the parties at the hearing required by section 119.11 . . .

H. BLUDWORTH, v. PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., 476 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . same day the trial court issued a rule to show cause, returnable later that day, pursuant to section 119.11 . . .

THE MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 75 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . Mandamus which was tried before the Court in an expedited hearing held pursuant to the mandate of Section 119.11 . . . Petition for Writ of Mandamus, within 48 hours of entry of this Writ of Mandamus, as provided by Section 119.11 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 463 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1984)

. . . The Herald asserted that the legislature expressed public policy in section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes . . . We conclude that we should implement the public policy evidenced by section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes . . .

TRIBUNE COMPANY, v. CANNELLA, DePERTE, v. TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 458 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Section 119.11 provides for an accelerated court hearing when, inter alia, the party seeking to inspect . . . We are aware of the 48-hour deadline of section 119.11(2) upon which the court below relied in determining . . .

TRIBUNE COMPANY, v. CANNELLA,, 438 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 119.11, Fla.Stat. (1981); State ex rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. . . . attended by the children of law enforcement personnel are exempt from the provisions of subsection (1). 119.11 . . . [I]t is significant that section 119.11 requires that whenever a court orders an agency to open its records . . . We also conclude, in accord with the reasoning of Roberts, that section 119.11 implies that a forty-eight-hour . . . However, in accordance with the limitation on delay set forth in section 119.11, we now hold that an . . . subject of a delay in those times has also been expressly referred to by the legislature in section 119.11 . . . Section 119.11(2) provides for no delay for records production without a court order, and it is the only . . . would appear to be a rigid maximum time which, in contrast to the legislative plan evidenced by section 119.11 . . .

S. SEIGLE, T. F. v. Dr. D. BARRY E. Jr., 422 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The issues were presented to the court at a priority hearing provided for by Section 119.11(1). . . .

ROBERTS, v. NEWS- PRESS PUBLISHING CO. INC. d b a, 409 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . In regard to the reasonableness of the twenty-four hour delay, it is significant that section 119.11 . . .

DOUGLAS, v. MICHEL, d b a, 410 So. 2d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The lower court held a hearing pursuant to section 119.11(1), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

THE FLORIDA COMPANIES v. CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS, 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 154 (Pinellas Cty. Cir. Ct. 1982)

. . . , 1981, and that no appeal has been taken on a timely basis as required by Florida Statute, Chapter 119.11 . . .

THE FLORIDA COMPANIES v. CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS, 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 152 (Pinellas Cty. Cir. Ct. 1981)

. . . immediately available to Plaintiff for its inspection, examination, and copying, in accordance with Section 119.11 . . .

NEWS- PRESS PUBLISHING CO. INC. d b a v. GADD,, 388 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . . § 119.11, Fla. Stat. (1979); State ex rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. . . .

B. W. WAIT, III, v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, a, 372 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1979)

. . . except that which holds that Florida Appellate Rule 5.12(1) controls over the provisions of section 119.11 . . . considerations of rule 5.12(1) should give way to the special policy considerations inherent in section 119.11 . . . The district court, in Wait, held that section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975), which provides that . . . automatic stay provision of rule 5.12(1) takes precedence over the conflicting language of section 119.11 . . . First District is quashed to the extent that it holds that rule 5.12(1) does not control over section 119.11 . . . The present decision is limited to the relationship between section 119.11(2) and the “Florida Appellate . . .

E. BOUTWELL, v. NICHOL S ALLEY OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. a, 364 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 119.11(2). The filing of a notice of appeal shall not operate as an automatic stay. . . . Section 119.11(2). . . . Section 119.11(3). “In Clark v. . . . appeal need obtain a stay order is procedural, therefore Rule 5.12(1) takes precedence over Section 119.11 . . .

BYRON, HARLESS, SCHAFFER, REID AND ASSOCIATES, INC. a v. STATE W. SCHELLENBERG L., 360 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 119.11. . . . In appropriate cases presented under Section 119.11, the courts of first instance may and should order . . .

B. W. WAIT, III, v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, a, 353 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . that an appeal by a public agency stays the performance of the order appealed, controls over Section 119.11 . . . Section 119.11(1). . . . Section 119.11(2). . . . Section 119.11(3). In Clark v. . . .

UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA FEA UNITED, AFT- AFL- CIO v. BRANSON BRANSON v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, 350 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 119.11 provides there shall be no automatic stay on appeal of orders entered under Chapter 119 . . . Section 119.11, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

N. CLARK, v. J. WALTON,, 347 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . because he had not complied with the Judgment and failed to obtain a stay order as required by Section 119.11 . . . There is a direct conflict between Section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975) and Fla. . . . Fla.App.Rule 5.12 controls over Section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975) and the attempt by the legislature . . .

DONALD MANTER COMPANY, INC. v. E. DAVIS, 543 F.2d 419 (1st Cir. 1976)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice 119.11, at 2362-64 (2d ed. 1974). Reversed and remanded. . . .

UNITED STATES SHERMAN v. G. CARTER, G. d b a, 301 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . Supreme Court Clerk $100; additional docket fee, supervising fee, and handling and printing charges, $119.11 . . .

v. DEAN WITTER CO., 69 F.2d 259 (9th Cir. 1934)

. . . year ended December 31,1925, in the principal sum of One Hundred Nineteen Dollars and Eleven Cents ($119.11 . . .

J. A., 16 Fla. 773 (Fla. 1878)

. . . In March, 1873, Thompson, obtained a judgment in the County Court of Alachua county for $119.11 against . . .