The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . written comments and responses to written comments as required by sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and 120.541 . . .
. . . follow rulemaking procedures by failing to file a -SERC in response 'to the LCRA as required by section 120.541 . . . Division failed to follow rule-making procedures by failing to prepare a SERC as required by section 120.541 . . .
. . . of Estimated regulatory costs, if applicable, has been prepared and made available as provided in s. 120.541 . . .
. . . the [SERC] or revised [SERC], if applicable, has been prepared and made available as provided in s. 120.541 . . . Section 120.541(l)(d) provides that “an agency that is required to revise a [SERC] .shall provide notice . . . One circumstance in which the agency is required to revise a SERC is when a LCRA is submitted. § 120.541 . . . Stat.; but cf. § 120.541(l)(g) (stating that a rule cannot be invalidated based on the agency’s wrongful . . . See § 120.541, Fla. Stat. . . . .
. . . See § 120.541(2)—(3), Fla. Stat. . . . Pursuant to section 120.541(3), however, even though adopted, the amendment to rule 64B8-10.003 could . . . s order is moot due to the lack of legislative ratification of the amendment as required by section 120.541 . . . Although section 120.541(3) is a fairly recent statute— adopted in 2010—renewals of other rule ratification . . . See § 120.541(3), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . .” § 120.541(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . notice, a substantially affected person may submit a written proposal for a lower cost alternative. § 120.541 . . . ensure that an agency is considering less costly alternatives as required by sections 120.54(l)(d) and 120.541 . . .
. . . written comments and responses to written comments as required by sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and 120.541 . . .
. . . written comments and responses to written comments as required by sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and 120.541 . . .
. . . statement of the estimated regulatory costs, if one has been prepared, based on the factors set forth in s. 120.541 . . . regulatory costs, or to provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative as provided by s. 120.541 . . . proposed rule; a copy of any statement of estimated regulatory costs that has been prepared pursuant to s. 120.541 . . .
. . . written comments and responses to written comments as required by sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and 120.541 . . .
. . . alternatives that substantially accomplish the statutory objectives,” the challenger must comply with section 120.541 . . . Appellants argue that, because nobody submitted such a proposal, section 120.541(l)(c), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . written comments and responses to written comments as required by sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and 120.541 . . .
. . . .” § 120.541(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . the PSC’s revised statement of estimated regulatory costs did not meet the requirements of section 120.541 . . . submits “a good faith written proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative to a proposed rule.” § 120.541 . . . alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in. favor of the proposed rule. § 120.541 . . .
. . . written comments and responses to written comments as required by sections 120.54 (rule adoption) and 120.541 . . .