The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . various project facilities such as toll roads, waterway facilities, dredging, utility agreements, etc.), 125.031 . . .
. . . Stat. ch. 125.031 absent formal resolution, and, if so, what standards guide consideration of whether . . . Stat. ch. 125.031, a Board has ratified an agreement after the fact (“the Frankenmuth test”). . . . Stat. ch. 125.031: First, a board of county commissioners must have the power to approve the agreement . . . Stat. ch. 125.031. . . . Stat. ch. 125.031, and that Frankenmuth had satisfied its burden under the first prong of the ratification . . .
. . . . § 125.031, WHICH REQUIRES APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR CERTAIN LEASE-PURCHASE . . . determine that a board of county commissioners may approve a lease-purchase agreement under section 125.031 . . . Therefore, the Legislature’s pronouncement in section 125.031 is controlling here, and Flowers did not . . . Section 125.031 does not define the term “approval” as used in the statute, nor does the legislative . . . As a result, we determine that the term “approval” as used in section 125.031 does not require a board . . .
. . . The board of county commissioners then decided to utilize the provisions of F.S. 125.031, which provide . . . F.S. 125.031 does not specifically define what is meant by “lease-purchase arrangements,” and no appellate . . . question is not a “lease-purchase arrangement” and therefore does not come under the provisions of F.S. 125.031 . . . Under the provisions of F.S. 125.031, Martin County had the legal authority to enter into such a “lease-purchase . . . Executive Plaza, Ltd., and Martin County” is a valid “lease-purchase arrangement” pursuant to F.S. 125.031 . . .