Cases from cite.case.law:

RAMIK, v. DARLING INTERNATIONAL, INC. v., 161 F. Supp. 2d 772 (E.D. Mich. 2001)

. . . . § 125.581, et seq.l is a nuisance per se.” M.C.L. § 125.587. . . .

COMMUNITY TREATMENT CENTERS, INC. a v. CITY OF WESTLAND, a, 970 F. Supp. 1197 (E.D. Mich. 1997)

. . . States Constitution; (3) Count III: CTC alleges that this “exclusionary zoning” violates M.C.L.A § 125.581 . . . Under Michigan’s Zoning Enabling Act, M.C.L.A. § 125.581 et seq., cities and villages may create and . . . States Constitution; (3) Count III: CTC alleges that this “exclusionary zoning” violates M.C.L.A. § 125.581 . . . the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and in violation of M.C.L.A. § 125.581 . . . Count I of its brief on appeal, CTC argued that the City Council acted in derogation of M.C.L.A. § 125.581 . . .

ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. CITY OF HOLLAND,, 883 F. Supp. 207 (W.D. Mich. 1995)

. . . HRCA”), M.C.L. 117.1 et seq., and the relevant provision of the Zoning Enabling Act (“ZEA”), M.C.L. 125.581 . . .

SMITH LEE ASSOCIATES, INC. a k a a v. CITY OF TAYLOR, MICHIGAN,, 13 F.3d 920 (6th Cir. 1993)

. . . The statutory authority is found in the City or Village Zoning Enabling Act, Mich.Comp.Laws § 125.581 . . .

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICH. a v. NORTHWEST PARK CONSTRUCTION CORP. a, 280 F.2d 212 (6th Cir. 1960)

. . . .-2931, Comp.Laws 1948, § 125.581. As was said in Euclid, Ohio v. . . .