Cases from cite.case.law:

MONTANA v. WYOMING, 563 U.S. 368 (U.S. 2011)

. . . Tarlock, Law of Water Rights and Resources §§ 5:66, 5:68-5:69, pp. 5-130.3, 5-130.9 to 5-130.10 (2010 . . .

STATE OF MONTANA, v. STATE OF WYOMING STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, 179 L. Ed. 2d 799 (U.S. 2011)

. . . Tarlock, Law of Water Rights and Resources §§ 5:66, 5:68-5:69, pp. 5-130.3, 5-130.9 to 5-130.10 (2010 . . .

PENNACO ENERGY, INC. RMT v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 692 F. Supp. 2d 1297 (D. Wyo. 2009)

. . . . §§ 130.3, 130.10(d)(4), 131.6, 131.10, 131.11) (bold added). . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 415 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 130.3, 130.10(d)(4), 131.6, 131.10, 131.11; Am. . . .

BESTFOODS, v. THE UNITED STATES,, 342 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . . § 130.10(a) permits the use of a name of a standardized food to label a substitute food that does not . . .

v., 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 1053 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . . § 130.10(a) permits the use of a name of a standardized food to label a substitute food that does not . . .

EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY INC. v. SPRINT CORPORATION, T. SPRINT CORPORATION, v., 282 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Kan. 2003)

. . . World Oil Co., 973 F.Supp. 943, 948-49 (C.D.Cal.1997); 20 Holmes’ Appleman on Insurance 2d, § 130.10( . . .

AMERICAN WILDLANDS v. BROWNER, U. S. U. S. VIII, 260 F.3d 1192 (10th Cir. 2001)

. . . . §§ 130.3, 130.10(d)(4), 131.6, 131.10, 131.11. . . .

AMERICAN CANOE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 138 F. Supp. 2d 722 (E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . . § 130.10(b)(1), and EPA must review CPPs from "time to time” to ensure compliance with CWA requirements . . .

AMERICAN CANOE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 30 F. Supp. 2d 908 (E.D. Va. 1998)

. . . . § 130.10(b)(1), and EPA was required to review states’ CPPs from “time to time” to ensure that they . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. HANKINSON, 939 F. Supp. 872 (N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . or reissuance as necessary of Georgia’s Water Quality Management Plans (40 CFR §§ 130.6, 130.7 and 130.10 . . . ); Georgia’s Continuing Planning Process (CWA § 303(e); 40 CFR §§ 130.10 and 130.7); and any Memo-randa . . .

M. ROCHEZ, v. MITTLETON, T., 839 F. Supp. 1075 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . . § 130.10. . . . .

AMERICAN PAPER INSTITUTE, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DELMARVA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, WESTVACO CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY K. CITY OF AKRON, OHIO, A v. K. REILLY, USX CORPORATION, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY K., 996 F.2d 346 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 130.10(d)(4). . . . The petitioners focus on one subsection of the regulation, 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(5), and ignore another . . . subsection, 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(2), that incorporates the relevant statutoiy requirement regarding . . .

MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF BOROUGH OF ST. MARYS, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 945 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1991)

. . . . §§ 123.46(e), 130.10(d)(8) and (10). EPA may approve or disapprove a state’s § 304(Z) lists. . . . submittal, EPA, in cooperation with the state, must develop the lists by June 4, 1990. 40 C.F.R. § 130.10 . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(1) & (11) (authorizing Regional Administrators to solicit public comment and . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 915 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . .-46, 130.10. . . . The first regulation, codified at 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d), interprets sections 304(i )(1)(A), (B), and . . . The first two subsections of that regulation, subsections 130.10(d)(1) and (2), simply track the language . . . The next subsection of the regulation, section 130.10(d)(3), does not, however, track subsection 304( . . . The first one, 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(3), interprets section 304(i )(1)(C). . . .

WESTVACO CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 899 F.2d 1383 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . . §§ 130.10, 123.46). . . . (Codified at 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(8)). . . . (To be codified at 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(8)). . . . (To be codified at 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(10)). . . . (To be codified at 40 C.F.R. § 130.10(d)(ll)). . . .

MEAD JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP, MEAD JOHNSON COMPANY, v. R. BOWEN, H. H. S., 838 F.2d 1332 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 130.10 (1963), but in 1963 that policy was replaced by the current one. See 28 Fed. . . .

COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. v. E. TRAIN,, 649 F.2d 481 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 130.10(b)(2). . . . Statewide antidegradation policy and identify the methods for implementing such policy pursuant to § 130.10 . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. M. COSTLE, U. S. C. L. A. A., 439 F. Supp. 980 (E.D.N.Y. 1977)

. . . be completed which will implement applicable effluent limitations and water quality standards, CPP § 130.10 . . .

LOCAL GRAPHIC ARTS INTERNATIONAL UNION, v. EMPLOYING PRINTERS ASSOCIATION, 416 F. Supp. 769 (S.D. Iowa 1976)

. . . The goals of Phase III, as enunciated in 6 C.F.R. 130.10 (1974), Phase III regulations, were to continue . . .

R. Sr. v., 56 T.C. 388 (T.C. 1971)

. . . $66,982.40 $261.60 ' 2d ' . 34,024.98 182.93 39,313.94 183.71 " 3d " . . 24,098.16 129.66 27,841.40 130.10 . . . SERVICE Yearl Years 186 at 2G0.43=$48,439.98 186 at $129.56=$24,098.16 214 at 261.60= 55,982.40 214 at 130.10 . . .

v., 36 T.C. 818 (T.C. 1961)

. . . retirement annuity policy, which provided for the payment to petitioner of monthly installments of $130.10 . . .

STATE v. MONROE COUNTY,, 81 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1955)

. . . issuance of bonds that require the levy of an ad valorem tax for their payment, sections 130.02 and 130.10 . . .

C. v., 7 B.T.A. 308 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . deficiency letter dated March 3, 1925, asserts deficiencies in the amounts of $674.28 for the year 1919; $130.10 . . .

ISELIN v. BARNEY, 13 F. Cas. 166 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1863)

. . . case, that the duty was not liquidated or fixed till the 1st or 2d of August, and was then reduced $130.10 . . .