Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 153.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 153.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 153.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 153
WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 153.10
153.10 Call for bids.
(1) As soon as practicable after the authorization of bonds under the provisions of this chapter or the appropriation of moneys for the construction of water system improvements or sewer improvements, the commission shall publish once, in a newspaper published in the county, and, if the estimated cost exceeds $10,000, in a newspaper of general circulation in the state, a notice calling for sealed bids to be received by the commission on a date not earlier than 15 days from the first publication, for the construction of the work.
(2) The notice shall refer in general terms to the extent and nature of the improvement or improvements and may identify the same by the short designation indicated in the initial resolution and by reference to the plans and specifications on file. If the initial resolution shall have given two or more alternative descriptions of the improvement as to its material, nature, character and size, and if the commission shall not have theretofore determined upon a definite description, the notice shall call for bids upon each of such descriptions.
(3) Bids may be requested for the work as a whole or for any part thereof separately and bids may be asked for any one or more improvements authorized by the same or different resolutions, but any bid covering work upon more than one improvement shall be in such form as to permit a separation of cost as to each improvement.
(4) The notice shall require bidders to file with their bids either a certified check upon an incorporated bank or trust company for 2.5 percent of the amount of their respective bids or a bid bond in like amount with corporate surety satisfactory to the attorney for the county to ensure the execution of a contract to carry out the work in accordance with such plans and specifications and to ensure the filing, at the making of such contract, of a bond in the amount of the contract price with corporate sureties satisfactory to such attorney conditioned for the performance of the work in accordance with such contract.
(5) The commission shall have the right to reject any and all bids, and if all bids are rejected the commission may readvertise.
History.s. 10, ch. 29837, 1955; s. 2, ch. 57-774.

F.S. 153.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 153.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 153.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 153.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 153.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In D. LOVELACE K. D. K. v. USAA, 443 B.R. 494 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . Rule 153.10 provides that “an owner may have only one equity loan at a time, regardless of the aggregate . . . gain shelter under the “exception” in section 50(a)(4), and in the process directly contradicting Rule 153.10 . . .

P. WEGNER, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY,, 129 F.3d 814 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . Green 118-.90 150.00 17,835.00 Total:' 153.10 • $24,405.00 All attorneys are employed by the law firm . . .

TORRINGTON COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, SKF USA SKF U. K., 44 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 153.10(b) (1976) (last Sentence). 41 Fed.Reg. 26,204 (1976). . . . New regulation 19 C.F.R. § 353.15 retained the substance of 19 C.F.R. § 153.10. 45 Fed.Reg. 8,185 (1980 . . .

DeVITO, v. HEMPSTEAD CHINA SHOP, INC., 831 F. Supp. 1037 (E.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . award costs for the purchase of an index number and the remaining disbursements, for a total sum of $153.10 . . . (4) attorney’s fees in the amount of $25,072.50; and (5) costs and disbursements in the amount of $153.10 . . .

TIMBERLAND PAVING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNITED STATES, Co., 18 Cl. Ct. 129 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . It sought cost recovery for the same nine items, in a total amount of $265,-153.10. . . .

SONCO STEEL TUBE DIV. FERRUM, INC. v. UNITED STATES, Co., 694 F. Supp. 959 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . Duties, 44 Fed.Reg. 59,742, 59,744, 59,-749 (Oct. 16, 1979) (Treasury’s proposed revision of 19 CFR § 153.10 . . .

v. Co., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 745 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . Reg. 59,742, 59,744,59,749 (Oct. 16,1979) (Treasury’s proposed revision of 19 CFR § 153.10(e)(3)). . . .

ASAHI CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 692 F. Supp. 1376 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . Section 153.10(a) of the Customs Regulations provided: Section 153.10 Fair Value; circumstances of sale . . . allowed because they did “not constitute circumstances of any particular sale, as required by section 153.10 . . . Defendant, in not allowing expenses for advertising, also relied on language in Customs Regulation 153.10 . . . constitute circumstances of any particular sale, * * * The first test to be applied under 19 C.F.R. 153.10 . . .

Co. v., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 690 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . Section 153.10(a) of the Customs Regulations provided: § 153.10 Fair Value; circumstances of sale. . . . allowed because they did "not constitute circumstances of any particular sale, as required by section 153.10 . . . Defendant, in not allowing expenses for advertising, also relied on language in Customs Regulation 153.10 . . . constitute circumstances of any particular sale, * * * The first test to be applied under 19 U.S.C. 153.10 . . .

Co. v. H. U. S. U. S. N. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. J. U. S. NTN, 11 Ct. Int'l Trade 786 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987)

. . . differences in circumstances of sale, and had applied the ESP offset to constructed value. 19 C.F.R. 153.10 . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 153.10 (1976), 41 Fed. Reg. 26,204 (1976). . . .

TIMKEN COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, H. N. M. J. NTN, 673 F. Supp. 495 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987)

. . . differences in circumstances of sale, and had applied the ESP offset to constructed value. 19 C.F.R. 153.10 . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 153.10 (1976), 41 Fed.Reg. 26,204 (1976). . . .

TIMKEN COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, H. N. M. J. NTN, 630 F. Supp. 1327 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . . § 153.10(c) (1979) (emphasis added). In Smith-Corona Group v. . . . 1274, 79 L.Ed.2d 679 (1984), the Federal Circuit upheld a regulation virtually identical to section 153.10 . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 153.10 (1979); 19 C.F.R. § 353.15 (1981); Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 153.10(a) (1979); 19 C.F.R. § 353.15(a) (1985). . . . .

Co. v. H. U. S. U. S. N. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. J. U. S. NTN, 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 86 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . . § 153.10(c) (1979) (emphasis added). In Smith-Corona Group v. United States, 713 F.2d 1568 (Fed. . . . denied, 465 U.S. 1022 (1984), the Federal Circuit upheld a regulation virtually identical to section 153.10 . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 153.10 (1979); 19 C.F.R. § 353.15 (1981); Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 153.10(a) (1979); 19 C.F.R. § 353.15(a) (1985). . . .

SMITH- CORONA GROUP, SCM v. UNITED STATES,, 713 F.2d 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 153.10 (1976). . Cf. . . . The offset was originally published at 41 Fed.Reg. 26,204 (1976) and was codified at 19 C.F.R. § 153.10 . . .

v., 3 Ct. Int'l Trade 163 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1982)

. . . the Secretary relied on the costs of such differences in conformity with a Customs Regulation, 19 CFR 153.10 . . . IV Under 19 C.F.R. 153.10(a) (1978) allowances for differences in circumstances of sale “are limited, . . . Thus section 153.10(b) provides that “allowances generally will not be made for differences in advertising . . .

BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, SCM SMITH- CORONA GROUP, CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIVISION, SCM CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 540 F. Supp. 1341 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1982)

. . . Para, (d) of § 153.10 has been changed to provide that in determining allowances for differences in circumstances . . .

I v. SCM II SCM v., 3 Ct. Int'l Trade 125 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1982)

. . . Para, (d) of § 153.10 has been changed to provide that in determining allowances for differences in circumstances . . .

ALBERTA GAS CHEMICALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 515 F. Supp. 780 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

. . . pursuant to § 153.9 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 153.9) or for circumstances of sale, pursuant to § 153.10 . . . (19 CFR 153.10). . . .

v., 1 Ct. Int'l Trade 312 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

. . . pursuant to § 153.9 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 153.9) or for circumstances of sale, pursuant to § 153.10 . . . (19 CFR 153.10). . . .

JACOBSON, v. WEINBERGER,, 398 F. Supp. 575 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)

. . . The latest recomputation, which considered earnings through 1971, increased his monthly benefit to $153.10 . . . , this recomputed amount is reduced by $4.80 to equal a monthly benefit effective January, 1972 of $153.10 . . . insurance amount, using these new years of higher earnings, was computed correctly by the Secretary at $153.10 . . .

HEAD, DOING LEA COUNTY PUBLISHING CO. v. NEW MEXICO BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY, 374 U.S. 424 (U.S. 1963)

. . . . § 153.10. . . .

v., 36 T.C. 818 (T.C. 1961)

. . . guaranteed endowment annuity, under which Connecticut Mutual agreed to pay petitioner an income for life of $153.10 . . .