Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 153.20 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 153.20 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 153.20

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 153
WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 153.20
153.20 Alternative method.
(1) This chapter shall be deemed to provide an additional and alternative method for the doing of the things authorized hereby and shall be regarded as supplemental and additional to the powers conferred upon the commission by other laws, and shall not be regarded as in derogation of any powers now existing. This chapter being necessary for the welfare of the inhabitants of the several counties of the state shall be liberally construed to effect the purposes thereof.
(2) This chapter shall not repeal any local or special act or law conferring upon any of the several counties or county commissions the powers and duties or any of them imposed hereby, but it shall be deemed to be an alternative or additional method for such counties or county commissions to effect the purposes of this chapter.
History.ss. 20, 22, ch. 29837, 1955.

F.S. 153.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 153.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 153.20


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 153.20
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 153.20.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NEW MEXICO HEALTH CONNECTIONS, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES M., 340 F. Supp. 3d 1112 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . . § 153.20 ; (ii) how HHS determines a plan's average actuarial risk from individual risk scores, see . . . 45 C.F.R. §§ 153.20, .320(b)(2) ; and (iii) how HHS uses a plan's average actuarial risk to determine . . . the plan's risk adjustment payments and charges, see 45 CFR §§ 153.20, .320(b)(3). . . .

NEW MEXICO HEALTH CONNECTIONS, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES M., 312 F. Supp. 3d 1164 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . . § 153.20 ; (ii) how HHS determines a plan's average actuarial risk from individual risk scores, see . . . 45 C.F.R. §§ 153.20, .320(b)(2) ; and (iii) how HHS uses a plan's average actuarial risk to determine . . . the plan's risk adjustment payments and charges, see 45 CFR §§ 153.20, .320(b)(3). . . .

MINUTEMAN HEALTH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 291 F. Supp. 3d 174 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . . §§ 153.20, 153.320. . . .

BATSCHE v. BURWELL,, 210 F. Supp. 3d 1130 (D. Minn. 2016)

. . . . § 153.20). . . . Reg. 13744, 13834 (Mar. 11, 2014) (codified at 45 C.F.R. § 153.20). . . .

STATE v. UNITED STATES, 154 F. Supp. 3d 621 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . . § 153.20. . . . to use a third-party administrator ... for transfer of the reinsurance contributions.” 45 C.F.R. § 153.20 . . .

In ORTEGON, v., 398 B.R. 431 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Defendant argued that a later administrative commentary, Senate Joint Resolution § 153.20, issued by . . .

WIRTZ, v. KANSAS FARM BUREAU SERVICES, INC., 355 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D. Kan. 2005)

. . . plaintiffs counsel’s affidavit in support of his motion for attorney’s fees and costs and found that $153.20 . . . Therefore, the court grants defendant’s objections and denies all of plaintiffs photocopying costs. $153.20 . . . award: Plaintiffs original request $7,419.47 Disallowed expenses: Telefacsimile (.01) Photocopying (153.20 . . .

RAPP, E. v. CITY OF EASTON C. C., 77 F. App'x 88 (3d Cir. 2003)

. . . pre-judgment) and 12.00 to 9.00 (post-judgment), Rambo’s hours from 39.80 to 37.60, and Baldo’s from 154.80 to 153.20 . . .

In A. WERTHEN, A. v., 282 B.R. 553 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2002)

. . . the court reversed course, declaring finally that all the contested obligations, including the $ 611,-153.20 . . .

ROPER, v. CITY OF CLEARWATER,, 796 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 2001)

. . . See § 153.20, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

PINELLAS COUNTY, v. STATE, 776 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 2001)

. . . See § 153.20, Fla.Stat. (1997). . . .

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, a v. MORRIS, 730 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . the chapter is “necessary for the welfare of the inhabitants of the several counties of the state_” § 153.20 . . .

LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. CHILES, P. A., 674 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The judge, finding that the attorney expended 383 hours representing the client, at $153.20 an hour, . . .

MASON C. DAY EXCAVATING, INC. v. CROWDER CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. Co., 676 F. Supp. 670 (W.D.N.C. 1987)

. . . Welding................ 25.00 Check printing charges ........... 39.90 West Durham Lumber............ 153.20 . . . The same fate must befall Crowder’s claimed expenses for charges from “West Durham Lumber” ($153.20) . . .

M. SPEER v. OLSON, 367 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Section 153.20, Florida Statutes (1975), provides insight into the intent of the Legislature in enacting . . . Chapter 153: “153.20 Alternative method.— “(1) This chapter shall be deemed to provide an additional . . .

IGLINSKY, Jr. v. L. RICHARDSON,, 433 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . the total of his benefits, $402.80 per month, exceeded 80 percent of his average monthly earnings by $153.20 . . .

A. E. MOUNTAIN J. v. PINELLAS COUNTY,, 152 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Moreover, in § 153.20 it is expressly provided that the general act is'alternative and supplemental and . . . J., and SMITH, J., concur. . § 153.20, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., entitled “Alternative Method,” reads as follows . . .

EMANUEL v. KANSAS CITY TITLE TRUST CO., 127 F.2d 175 (8th Cir. 1942)

. . . suggestion, called at defendant’s office and were advised that it would be necessary for them to deposit $153.20 . . . On November 8, 1935, the plaintiff paid to the defendant $153.20, and executed and left with it a deed . . . which he did make, “it would hold all of said moneys and said documents, together with the sum of $153.20 . . . , that if plaintiff would pay to -defendant certain items amounting to and in the aggregate sum of $153.20 . . . & Trust Company to release that mortgage upon the payment by the plaintiff of the items, first of $153.20 . . .

HARVEY v. ALLEN, 11 F. Cas. 727 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1879)

. . . the 9th of January, 1873, the plaintiff directed the Broadway Bank to credit itself in account with $153.20 . . .