Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. SLATTEN,, 865 F.3d 767 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . relief for a sentence of 50 years to life under California’s "three strikes law” for the theft of $153.54 . . .

IN RE L. HECKMAN, L. v., 560 B.R. 657 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Exhibit D-3, Tab P-8: $141.83, $352.24, $310.13, $600.00, $316.92, $500.00, $170.33, $306.59, $418.83, $153.54 . . . Exhibit R-2, they are accounting entries used to classify two payments in the amount of $170.33 and $153.54 . . .

STEWART, v. M. DIAZ,, 579 F. App'x 611 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . clearly established federal law by affirming two consecutive twenty-five-year sentences for stealing $153.54 . . .

CROSBY, v. T. SCHWARTZ,, 678 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . Court upheld a California Three Strikes 25 to life sentence for petty theft convictions for theft of $153.54 . . .

TOLDEN, v. E. TILTON,, 449 F. App'x 579 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . twenty-five years to life for a “third strike” conviction where the defendant stole nine videotapes worth $153.54 . . .

MOSSER CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 665 F. Supp. 2d 875 (N.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . . § 153.54(J). Weybrecht therefore has been statutorily overruled. . . . R.C. § 153.54(J) adopts the definitions in Ohio's mechanic's lien statute, R.C. § 1311.25, which provides . . .

GONZALEZ, v. W. A. DUNCAN,, 551 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . sentence of 25 years to life imprisonment for two petty theft convictions arising from the theft of $153.54 . . .

EDWARDS, v. L. OLLISON,, 621 F. Supp. 2d 863 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . See Andrade, 538 U.S. at 66, 123 S.Ct. 1166 (petty theft of $153.54 worth of videotapes from retail store . . .

DELGADO, v. A. YATES,, 622 F. Supp. 2d 854 (N.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . There, the defendant stole $153.54 worth of videotapes from two stores on separate occasions. . . .

ROBERTS, v. MAHONING COUNTY, v., 495 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Ohio 2007)

. . . (A)(1) or 153.54(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code, accompanying the bid, shall be scaled in the bid envelope . . . An original bond, in accordance with Division (A)(1) of 153.54 of the Ohio Revised Code, for the full . . . amount of the bid conditioned, as provided in Division (B) of 153.54 of the Ohio Revised Code. . . . A certified check or cashier’s check, in accordance with Division (A)(2) of 153.54 of the Ohio Revised . . . Code, equal to five percent (5%) of the bid conditioned, as provided in Division (C) of 153.54 of the . . .

TAYLOR, v. LEWIS,, 460 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . And in Andrade, the petitioner committed a petty theft of $153.54 worth of videotapes from a retail store . . . But it is not obvious to us that Andrade’s depriving a K-Mart of $153.54 worth of videotapes is graver . . .

DURAN, v. CASTRO,, 227 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (E.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . e.g., Andrade, 270 F.3d 743 (petitioner sentenced to life in prison for theft of videotapes worth $153.54 . . .

BROWN, v. D. A. MAYLE Jr. v. E., 283 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . convicted of two separate counts of petty theft for shoplifting a total of nine videotapes valued at $153.54 . . .

ANDRADE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA B., 270 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . As a result, Andrade, a non-violent recidivist who twice shoplifted merchandise worth a total of $153.54 . . . sentence of 50 years to life for two shoplifting offenses involving nine videotapes worth a total of $153.54 . . . petty theft with a prior for shoplifting videotapes on two different occasions with a total value of $153.54 . . . inference of gross disproportionality when compared to his two petty thefts of nine videotapes worth $153.54 . . . It should be emphasized that Andrade’s sentence is not one fifty-year sentence for thefts totaling $153.54 . . .

SAEWITZ v. N. EPSTEIN, 6 F. Supp. 2d 151 (N.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . remaining claims, defendants have sufficiently established that they paid $653.74 to Central Hudson, $153.54 . . .

In BOWNIC INSULATION CONTRACTORS, INC. RIESER, v. LANDIS GYR POWERS, INC., 134 B.R. 261 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1991)

. . . Osterfeld provided payment and performance bonds on the Project in conformance with Ohio Revised Code § 153.54 . . .

STATE OF OHIO, STAR SUPPLY, DIVISION OF STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CITY OF GREENFIELD, OHIO,, 528 F. Supp. 955 (S.D. Ohio 1981)

. . . . § 153.54 (1978) (amended, Aug. 8, 1980) — to assure that subcontractors, laborers and materialmen were . . .

PASCO TERMINALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 416 F. Supp. 1242 (Cust. Ct. 1976)

. . . the publication of Notice of Withholding, Azufrera could itself post the bond required by 19 CFR § 153.54 . . .

v., 76 Cust. Ct. 204 (Cust. Ct. 1976)

. . . the publication of Notice of Withholding, Azufrera could itself post the bond required by 19 CFR § 153.54 . . .

KECO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 176 Ct. Cl. 983 (Ct. Cl. 1966)

. . . involved in the production of these units, and will accept a reduction in the unit price of Item 3 of $153.54 . . .

WESTERN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a v. S. BROOKS, In BRUNS COAL COMPANY, a d b a, 362 F.2d 486 (4th Cir. 1966)

. . . Ohio Revised Code, § 153.54, provides in part that a public contractor shall be required to execute: . . .

v., 9 Ohio Misc. 61 (4th Cir. 1966)

. . . Section 153.54, Revised Code, provides in part that a public contractor shall be required to execute: . . .

v., 41 T.C. 181 (T.C. 1963)

. . . Upon the evidence before us, the weekly rate of payments was $153.54 (the year’s salary of $7,984.27 . . . to determine the excludable portion thereof, is one having a numerator of $100 and a denominator of $153.54 . . .