Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 153.93 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 153.93 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 153.93

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 153
WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 153.93
153.93 Responsibility for setting user fees.Responsibility for the setting of user fees charged to members of the public purchasing or using a wastewater service of a wastewater facility subject to a wastewater facility privatization contract; collection of such fees; and enforcement of fee obligations, regulations, and other requirements and obligations applicable to members of the public who purchase or use the wastewater service shall remain obligations of the public entity.
History.s. 4, ch. 96-202.

F.S. 153.93 on Google Scholar

F.S. 153.93 on Casetext

Amendments to 153.93


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 153.93
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 153.93.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GERBER FOOD YUNNAN CO. LTD. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 601 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . Preliminary Results”), published on March 7, 2005, Commerce calculated an antidumping duty assessment rate of 153.93% . . . To arrive at the 153.93% rate, Commerce relied upon 19 U.S.C. § 1677e to apply a procedure that it termed . . .

Co. Co. Co. v., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 186 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . Preliminary Results”), published on March 7, 2005, Commerce calculated ah antidumping duty assessment rate of 153.93% . . . To arrive at the 153.93% rate, Commerce relied upon 19 U.S.C. § 1677e to apply a procedure that it termed . . .

J. LEE P. C. E. D. O. A. V. O A. A. Jr. A. L. E. K. M. v. VANCE EXECUTIVE PROTECTION, INCORPORATED,, 7 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2001)

. . . provided to detail leaders attending a Vance seminar listed the “average daily rate” paid to Agents as $153.93 . . .

ANDERSON, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 807 F. Supp. 17 (N.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . Plaintiff contends that his counsel reasonably spent 25 hours and that an hourly rate of $153.93 is appropriate . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOWDEN, 182 F.2d 251 (10th Cir. 1950)

. . . of the court below entered a default judgment against the Bowdens in favor of the United States for $153.93 . . .