The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05, 155.40 (McKinney 1967). . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . . Section 155.05(e) of the New York Penal Law broadly prohibits "instilling [in the victim] a fear that . . . Subsection 155.05(e)(vi) of the New York statute also prohibits extortion carried out by "instilling . . . Penal Law § 155.05(e)(vi). . . .
. . . . § 155.05(1). . . .
. . . . § 155.05 (McKinney 2017), we observe that even if private prosecution were authorized for such an offense . . .
. . . See New York Penal Law § 155.05-Larceny; defined. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(a), (b), (d). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1)). . . .
. . . In New York Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e), New York criminalizes “larceny by extortion”: 2. . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e), the evidence at trial establishes that Plaintiff had a reasonable, good faith . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1) (emphasis added). It is a specific intent crime.” . . . Penial Law § 155.05(2)(e) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(e), 160.00; Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-6-301, 76-6-406; Wash. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1). . . . Id. § 155.05(2). . . .
. . . Penal Law §• 155.05(1), (2)(e)(ix). . . .
. . . State Penal Law ¶ 155.05(2)(e) ("A person obtains property by extortion when he compels or induces another . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(e) (emphasis added). . . . There is no such section in the New York Penal Law; however, New York Penal Law § 155.05(e) defines larceny . . .
. . . . § 155.05. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05, (see id. ¶¶ 176-80). . . .
. . . Law § 155.05, withholding of personal property with intent to steal constitutes larceny. . . . .
. . . . §§ 155.05(2)(e), 105.17, 110.00 (McKinney 2013). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1) (Consol. 2013) (“A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent . . .
. . . . § 155.05(2)(e). . . . Id. § 155.05(2)(e)(iv), (viii). . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e), and may not be pled as a separate cause of action in a civil case, see Crandall . . .
. . . . [$155.05 (invoice 237843) + $225.12 (invoice 18118) + $4,043.12 (invoice 82238) + $230.00 (invoice . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 155.05; see also id. § 155.42. . . .
. . . Law § 155.05(2)(e)(i) (“A person obtains property by extortion when he compels or induces another person . . .
. . . Penal § 155.05(1). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1). . . .
. . . Please read Section 155, 155.04 and 155.05 of FP 96 to understand the type of format we need including . . . written narrative lacked four of the nine requirements under the contract pursuant to FP-96, section 155.05 . . . The specific deficiencies under FP-96, section 155.05 were identified in a rejection letter from the . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(i) & (ii). . . . New York Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(i), (ii), (iii) & (vi). . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(vi) (exempting from extortion liability threats of strikes, boycotts, or other . . . Rather, the plain language of section 155.05 generally prohibits obtaining property through threats of . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(i) & (ii). . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.05(2)(e), 155.42. . Cpt. ¶314. . Id. ¶317. . Id. ¶ 322. .Id. ¶¶ 323-24. . . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1). . . .
. . . . §§ 155.05 (West 1988), 155.40, 158.20 (West Supp. 1998), 176.25 ($50,000); but see, e. g., §§190.65 . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 105.13, 155.05, 155.40. . . . [c]ause physical injury to some person in the future.... ” N.Y Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(1). . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1). . . .
. . . See, e.g., New York Penal Law § 155.05(2)(b) (defining larceny to include, inter alia, the “exercise[ . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05. Bazuaye claims that the statute under which he was convicted, N.Y. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) and the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951.”). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(v) [emphasis added]. . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(ix). . . . (2)(e)(v) or 155.05(2)(e)(ix) appears to be that the type of threat proscribed by those sections are . . . Penal Law§ 155.05[2][e].) . (Dkt. No. 7, Ex. E [Plf.’s Am. . . . Penal Law § 155.05[2][e][v]); U.S. v. . . .
. . . . § 155.05, it is clear that robbery in the third degree under New York law satisfies the definition . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05. . . .
. . . . § 155.05 (defining larceny). . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(1), 160.00, which is defined as “any person who has a right to possession thereof . . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(1), 160.00, 155.00(5). . . . .
. . . Therefore, the lodestar is $325 x 155.05, or $50,391.25. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05 (1999). . . .
. . . (internal quotation omitted); see also New York Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) and the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Bldg. Indus. . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e); Bldg. Indus. Fund, 992 E.Supp. at 176 n. 9. . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) and the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. b. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05. . . .
. . . acts of larceny by embezzlement and larceny by false promise, in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.05 . . .
. . . Id. at 566-67, 708 N.Y.S.2d 41, 729 N.E.2d 698; New York Penal Law § 155.05(1). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05 (McKinney 1999). . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(a); People v. . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(d). A. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) (McKinney 2002). . . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1); See People v. Coates, 64 A.D.2d 1, 407 N.Y.S.2d 866, 869 (2d Dep’t 1978). . . .
. . . See N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(e) (McKinney 2000); see also People v. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1) (defining “stealing]” and “larceny” to require “intent to deprive another of property . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05, and were therefore not “clearly constitutionally deficient,” Bloomer v. . . .
. . . In addition, Wegmans cited to the Court Section 155.05 of the New York State Penal Law which provides . . . However, the case law in New York is clear that the issuance of a bad check is only larceny under Section 155.05 . . . , it does not appear to this Court that he could be found guilty of larceny as set forth in Section 155.05 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05 (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(v) (McKinney 1988), in violation of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952(a)(3) . . .
. . . Reisner in violation of N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . . Reisner in violation of N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). . . . (d); ' or (4) the facts surrounding the predicate acts of extortion in violation of N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05 . . .
. . . PENAL LAW § 155.05(2)(e)(viii), 200.10, 225.30(1-3). . . .
. . . . § 155.05(2)(e). . . . the statutes by relying on the provision that covers “refusing to perform an official duty,” Id. §§ 155.05 . . .
. . . Id., § 155.05(2)(e). These offenses are mutually exclusive. People v. . . . predicate acts of extortion under the Hobbs Act are sufficient to establish extortion under N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05 . . .
. . . . § 875(d) (“ § 875(d)”) and § 155.05.2(e)(v) of the New York Penal Law (“ § 155.05”) are unconstitutionally . . . commerce facilities with the intent to carry on extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(d) and § 155.05 . . . Accordingly, this Court has interpreted the “threats” punishable by §§ 875(d) and 155.05 as only those . . . Similarly, § 155.05 prohibits (1) threats to expose a secret tending to subject some person to hatred . . . Jackson now claims that §§ 875(d) and 155.05 are unconstitutionally vague. . . .
. . . held that a partner in a general partnership cannot be convicted of larceny under New York Penal § 155.05 . . .
. . . . § 155.05(2)(c). . . .
. . . No. 155.05 (1969). . . .
. . . Clark, 242 N.Y. 313, 328, 151 N.E. 631, 636 (1926), and remains so today, N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(1) & . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) and interference with commerce by threats or violence in violation of the Hobbs . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) or interference with commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05 (McKinney 1988); see also N.Y. . . .
. . . . § 1951, and New York State Penal Law §§ 155.05(e) (extortion) and 180.25 (receipt of bribe' by labor . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) as RICO predicate acts since none of the third-party defendants are alleged . . . predicate acts, including 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (the Hobbs Act) and extortion under New York Penal Law § 155.05 . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e). See, e.g., People v. . . . Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e), which defines the crime of extortion. . 18 U.S.C. § 1962(b) provides: It shall . . .
. . . See N.Y.Penal Law §§ 155.00(1), 155.05(2)(e) (McKinney 1988). . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(2) (McKinney 1988) (emphases added). . . .
. . . Penal Law, Sec. 155.05 as follows: “A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05(1). . . . Penal § 155.05(1) (McKinney 1988). . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 155.05 states that “[a] person obtains property by extortion when he compels or . . . such property to himself or to a third person by means of instilling in him fear----” N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05 . . .
. . . amounts to the wrongful confiscation of the plaintiffs property in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.05 . . . because the same conduct “constitutes deceitful and unlawful practice in violation of New York Penal Law 155.05 . . . Section 155.05 of the New York Penal Law sets forth the legal definition of larceny. . . .
. . . House 155.05 hours, and Terry A. Zelin-ski 161.60 hours. On December 28, 1992, Richard P. . . .
. . . . § 155.05(2)(e). See also Blair, 775 F.Supp. at 1324. . . .
. . . damage to property; or (iii) Engage in other conduct constituting a crime; or New York Penal Law Section 155.05 . . . have satisfied the “property" element of larceny by extortion set out in New York Penal Law Section 155.05 . . .
. . . requires a showing that the defendant had the “intent to deprive another of property____” N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05 . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05[2][d] (McKinney 1988). . . .
. . . Section 155.05 It does so to simplify pleading and proof and to eliminate “sophistic technicalities”. . . . Section 155.05 of New York Penal Law defines the crime of larceny as follows: “A person steals property . . .
. . . . § 1341 (1984), and extortion, New York State Penal Code, §§ 155.05(2)(e)(ii)(ix), 155.30, 155.35, 155.40 . . . plaintiff contends, because plaintiff has failed to properly plead extortion under New York Penal Law Sec. 155.05 . . . New York Penal Law § 155.05(1) (1988). . . .
. . . . § 1951; larceny, see N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(2)(d) (McKinney 1988); offering false instruments for filing . . .
. . . Penal Law sec. 155.05 (McKinney 1988).] Extortion does not require an express threat. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.05 states, in turn, that "larceny” occurs when, "with the intent to deprive another of . . .
. . . See, e.g., PENAL LAW §§ 155.05(2)(c), 155.35, 155.40 (larceny in second or third degree, Class C & D . . .
. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶155.05[5] (2d ed. 1988). . . .
. . . well as coercion in the first degree, robbery and larceny in violation of Sections 135.65, 160.10 and 155.05 . . .
. . . Former New York Penal Law § 155.05, subd. 2 (McKinney 1975) included within the broad definition of “ . . . Former New York Penal Law § 155.05 subd. 2(d) (McKinney 1975). . . .
. . . .” § 155.05, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 155.05(1) provides that “[a] person steals property and commits larceny when, with . . . Penal Law § 155.05(1) (McKinney 1975). . . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(2)(e), 155.40 (McKinney 1975)); and mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982)). . . . commerce by extortion (18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1982)); and larceny by extortion in violation of N.Y.Penal Law §§ 155.05 . . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(2)(3), 155.40 (McKinney 1975), define "extortion” in terms similar to the federal . . .
. . . Penal Code § 155.05(2)(e)(ix) (McKinney 1975). . . .
. . . . § 1951 and NYPL § 155.05. 4. . . .
. . . . § 1951 and NYPL § 155.05. 4. . . .
. . . participation in other real estate transactions constituted both extortion, in violation of section 155.05 . . . at 100 Central Park South, defendants were committing larceny by extortion in violation of section 155.05 . . . The provisions of Section 155.05 of the New York Penal Law upon which plaintiff relies are the following . . .
. . . the property____” Thus, robbery under § 160.00 incorporates larceny, which under New York Penal Law § 155.05 . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(viii); 42 U.S.C. § 1983. . . .
. . . On October 31, 1979, plaintiff Emmett Banks was cited for violation of §§ 155.05 and 155.06(A) of Forest . . .
. . . .-05(1) and 155.05(2). . . . Section 155.05 defines the crime of “larceny,” in pertinent part, as follows: “1. . . . This is said to constitute larceny by misappropriation under § 155.05(1), and larceny by embezzlement . . . under § 155.05(2). . . .
. . . 140.20 (McKinney 1975), note 2 supra, in this case the crime of larceny, governed by N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05 . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05(1) provides: A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to . . .
. . . of the owner.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 523.14 at 523-106 (15th ed. 1979); see also N.Y.Penal Law § 155.05 . . .
. . . Feres Court have since been discredited or repudiated, see 1 Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims, § 155.05 . . .