Cases from cite.case.law:

NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION, v. M. NIELSON, U. S., 318 F. Supp. 3d 145 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Summing up those entries, they report spending a total of 602.75 hours on this case, including 159.25 . . . That said, the 159.25 hours spent on the Motion were excessive. . . . Attorney Hours Year Requested Reduction Final Rate Total 2017 447.50 (13.5) 434 $196.78 $85,402.52 2018 159.25 . . .

In SACKO, s, 394 B.R. 90 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . its claim for prepetition mortgage arrears: 19 Monthly Payments at $409.62 $ 7,782.78 Late charges 159.25 . . . Late Charges In the Amended Claim, Aurora asserts an entitlement to $159.25 in late charges. . . .

UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES CURRENCY IN THE SUM OF SIX HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS, 438 F. Supp. 2d 67 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . The hourly rate for 2005, based on the CPI, is adjusted by 27.4%, resulting in a rate of $159.25 per . . . Thus, claimant is awarded attorneys’ fees at the hourly rate of $159.25 for hours billed in 2005 and . . .

In NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 414 F. Supp. 2d 914 (D.S.D. 2005)

. . . The DeMersseman, Jensen, Christianson, Stanton & Huffman, LLP firm spent 159.25 hours on this ease. . . .

In STOUT,, 236 B.R. 851 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . to award the fees as requested, there would remain for distribution to creditors only the amount of $159.25 . . .

STACY, v. B. Q. STROUD,, 845 F. Supp. 1135 (S.D.W. Va. 1993)

. . . Reducing that number by half, to account for plaintiffs unsuccessful claims, results in 159.25 hours . . . Multiplying 159.25 by $125 yields $19,-906.25. . . . supplemental memorandum 6.0 6.0 SUBTOTALS: 321.9 318.5 Reduced for unsuccessful, undivided claims x .50 159.25 . . .

GROGG, G. R. C. N. J. AFL- CIO- CLC, AFL- CIO- CLC, AFL- CIO- CLC, AFL- CIO- CLC, AFL- CIO- CLC, AFL- CIO- CLC, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 612 F. Supp. 1375 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . Accordingly, the total of 159.25 hours less 43 hours claimed for pre-June 1981 work, or 116.25 hours, . . .

STATE OF ARIZONA, v. MARICOPA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY,, 578 F. Supp. 1262 (D. Ariz. 1984)

. . . Goldstein 3.4 44.2 55.6 Jenkins-Reed 11.4 7.0 7.0 Cooper 35.3 35.3 Connors PARALEGALS 9.6 Crowley 9.6 100 159.25 . . .

J. DAVIDSON, Jr. v. L. COOK, v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY CO., 567 F. Supp. 225 (E.D. Va. 1983)

. . . The Fund apparently has also suffered a loss in the amount of $159.25, the amount of interest it had . . .

STATE v. LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 410 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 1982)

. . . Florida Industrial Development Financing Act, §§ 159.25 — 159.431. . . . .

STATE v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, a, 397 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1981)

. . . Constitution, by the enactment of the Florida Industrial Development Financing Act, as amended, being sections 159.25 . . . The Industrial Development Financing Act, enacted in 1969, part II of chapter 159, sections 159.25-159.43 . . .

STATE v. JACKSONVILLE PORT AUTHORITY, JACKSONVILLE PORT AUTHORITY, v. STATE, 305 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1974)

. . . To implement this constitutional language, the legislature enacted Chapter 159, Part II, §§ 159.25 through . . .

STATE v. COUNTY OF DADE, a, 250 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . §§ 159.25 to 159.43, F.S.A., inclusive, in the aggregate principal amount of $3,850,000. . . . by the Florida Industrial Development Financing Act, Chapter 69-104, Laws of Florida, Fla.Stat. §§ 159.25 . . .

STATE v. PUTNAM COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, 249 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . §§ 159.25-159.43 F.S.A., Ch. 69-104, Laws of Florida, General Laws of 1969, authorizes any county, . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. CONWAY, M. R. No. M. No., 415 F.2d 158 (3d Cir. 1969)

. . . I. agents testified to having recovered $17,-159.25. . . .

McDONOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO. v. H. B. FOWLER CO. L. B., 281 F. Supp. 90 (E.D. La. 1968)

. . . The plaintiff should also recover survey costs amounting to $159.25. . . .

DURHAM, a v. WILLIAMS,, 202 So. 2d 856 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Reporter for services in connection with the Commissioner’s investigation in this matter in the amount of $159.25 . . .

, 156 Ct. Cl. 699 (Ct. Cl. 1962)

. . . plaintiff in the sum of $7,330.03, with $550.64 of that sum to be credited to plaintiff’s retirement fund, $159.25 . . .

H. MELVIN, v. H. WEST,, 120 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . this bond, plus additional costs of $359.25 for recording fee and intangible tax and the sum of $1,-159.25 . . .

v., 42 Cust. Ct. 512 (Cust. Ct. 1959)

. . . 325.50 Appeal No. 278482-A Export Date: 8/31/56 NR39 110.65 Appeal No. 251563-A Export Date: 7/12/51 A7 159.25 . . .

v., 47 B.T.A. 829 (B.T.A. 1942)

. . . The Commissioner in his determination of the deficiency has used $136,-159.25 as the basis for her undivided . . .

MACK- INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CORPORATION v. INTERSTATE TRANSIT, In MANCHESTER AUTO MACHINE CO., 4 F. Supp. 485 (W.D. Pa. 1932)

. . . inventoried and appraised at $5,835.86, and income received during the operation by the receivers of $4,-159.25 . . .

THE OREGON, 1 Alaska Fed. 826 (9th Cir. 1902)

. . . hardware, and wearing apparel, the property of the appellee, on which he paid freight amounting to $159.25 . . .

THE OREGON, 116 F. 482 (9th Cir. 1902)

. . . hardware, and wearing apparel, the property of the appellee, on which he paid freight amounting to $159.25 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)