The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 163.355

163.355 Finding of necessity by county or municipality.—No county or municipality shall exercise the community redevelopment authority conferred by this part until after the governing body has adopted a resolution, supported by data and analysis, which makes a legislative finding that the conditions in the area meet the criteria described in s. 163.340(7) or (8). The resolution must state that:

(1) One or more slum or blighted areas, or one or more areas in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly, exist in such county or municipality; and

(2) The rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas, including, if appropriate, the development of housing which residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly, can afford, is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals, or welfare of the residents of such county or municipality.

History.—s. 6, ch. 69-305; s. 4, ch. 84-356; s. 4, ch. 94-236; s. 3, ch. 2002-294.

F.S. 163.355 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.355 on Casetext

Amendments to 163.355

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 163.355

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 163.355.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. GASPAR- JUAREZ, 291 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D. Or. 2018)

. . . . § 163.355. In March, 2005, the U.S. . . . Stat. § 163.355 fits the definition of an aggravated felony "sexual abuse of a minor" within the meaning . . . Stat. § 163.355 provided as follows: "A person commits the crime of rape in the third degree if the person . . .

UNITED STATES v. PENALOZA- CARLON,, 842 F.3d 863 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 163.355(1). . . .

UNITED STATES v. VALDEZ- SANTANA, AKA, 651 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 163.355 and O.R.S. § 163.385 — criminalize sexual conduct based entirely on the age of the victim . . .

UNITED STATES v. PALAGUACHI,, 187 F. Supp. 3d 356 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . “I follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Ba-nos-Mejia and hold that defendant’s conviction under § 163.355 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CONTRERAS- MARTINEZ,, 578 F. App'x 660 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 163.355, was a categorical match for the generic federal definition of statutory rape and, therefore . . .

UNITED STATES v. CEBALLOS- CASTILLO,, 578 F. App'x 661 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 163.355, was a categorical match for the generic federal definition of statutory rape and, therefore . . .

UNITED STATES v. PENALOZA- CARLON,, 567 F. App'x 509 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 163.355, criminalizes sexual conduct based entirely on age. . . .

UNITED STATES v. VIDAL- MENDOZA,, 705 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 163.355 (1999). . . . .

ORTIZ- IBANEZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 458 F. App'x 590 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . Ortiz-Ibanez’s conviction for third-degree rape under Oregon Revised Statute § 163.355 is not categorically . . .

BAY COUNTY, v. TOWN OF CEDAR GROVE, v., 992 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Act reads: Before the governing body adopts any resolution or enacts any ordinance required under s. 163.355 . . .

SEGOVIANO MENDOZA, v. R. GONZALES,, 233 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . Segoviano Mendoza pled guilty, in February 1996, to third degree rape under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Segoviano Mendoza has not argued that his conviction under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 does . . .

RIVAS- GOMEZ, v. R. GONZALES,, 225 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . review attempts to raise the question of whether a conviction under Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) § 163.355 . . . In 2001, Rivas pleaded guilty to felony rape in the third degree pursuant to ORS § 163.355. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ- CHAVEZ,, 222 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . 394 F.3d 712, 718 (9th Cir.2005) (concluding that a conviction under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . .

FULMORE, v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY v. P. v. J. v. v. A. P. E. A. R. v. v. J. v. M. v. L. LLC, v. v. D. A. L. D. W. v. D. A. L. D. W. v., 928 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 163.355. . . .

RIVAS- GOMEZ, v. R. GONZALES,, 441 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . ORS § 163.355. . . . Thus, the court reasons, ORS § 163.355 “contains an inherent ‘without consent’ element.” . . . But ORS § 163.355 — the crime to which Rivas pled guilty — “is a Class C felony.” . . . ORS § 163.355 is not of “similar severity and import” to murder. . . . Code Wash. § 9A.44.060 — is not analogous to ORS § 163.355. . . . petition for review raises the question of whether a conviction under Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) § 163.355 . . . In 2001, Rivas pleaded guilty to felony rape in the third degree pursuant to ORS § 163.355. . . . contemporary, and common meaning” of the word “rape” to determine whether the conduct prohibited by ORS § 163.355 . . . ORS § 163.355. . . . Because ORS section 163.355 prohibits sexual activity that is both (1) unlawful and (2) without consent . . .

UNITED STATES v. ASBERRY,, 394 F.3d 712 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Asberry was arrested on July 1, 1993 and charged with violating Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Stat. § 163.355 (2003). Asberry pled guilty. . . . consider whether the district court erred in holding that a violation of Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Because we conclude that Rape in the Third Degree, as defined by Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Also, the conduct prohibited by section 163.355 may create a greater risk of physical injury than the . . . . §§ 163.345, 163.355 (2003). . . .

K. LaJOIE, v. S. THOMPSON,, 201 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2000)

. . . part: (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a prosecution for a crime described in ORS 163.355 . . . admissible. (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a prosecution for a crime described in ORS 163.355 . . .

K. LaJOIE, v. S. THOMPSON,, 217 F.3d 663 (9th Cir. 2000)

L. LYES, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA,, 126 F.3d 1380 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 163.355 (governing body must determine that: (1) slum or blighted areas or areas with shortage of . . .

KEY WEST HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA,, 987 F.2d 723 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 163.335, 163.355. . . . . §§ 163.335, 163.355. . . . . § 163.355. Thereafter, it may create a community redevelopment agency. § 163.356. . . .

H. BATMASIAN, v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a, 580 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Pursuant to section 163.355, Florida Statutes (1979), a finding that a blighted area exists in a municipality . . . Under Section 163.355, prior to any municipality exercising its power of eminent domain, the governing . . . the evidence produced at trial, the prerequisites for [a] finding of necessity pursuant to Section 163.355 . . .

BOCA RATON COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. BATMASIAN,, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 225 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . Under Section 163.355, prior to any municipality exercising its power of eminent domain, the governing . . . upon the evidence produced at trial, the prerequisites for finding of necessity pursuant to Section 163.355 . . .

HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, v. SAADA,, 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 161 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . Stat. 163.355 (1987), Fla. . . .

STATE v. MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,, 392 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1980)

. . . Section 163.355 requires that, in order for a county or municipality to exercise the authority conferred . . .

KATZ v. DADE COUNTY, a, 367 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Community Development Act, §§ 163.330, et seq., Fla.Stat. (1977), no finding of necessity required by § 163.355 . . .