Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 163.58 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 163.58 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 163.58

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 163.58
163.58 Transportation fare discounts.An authority, as defined in this chapter, chapter 343, or chapter 349, shall provide a partial or a full discount on fares for the use of a fixed-route transportation system operated by the authority to a disabled veteran as described in s. 295.07(1)(a) who presents information satisfactory to the authority which evidences eligibility for the discount.
History.s. 2, ch. 2016-196.

F.S. 163.58 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.58 on Casetext

Amendments to 163.58


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 163.58
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 163.58.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In D. SMITH, J. D. G. L. R. BOYER,, 141 B.R. 1527 (7th Cir. 1992)

. . . $125,000 based upon its deposit with the Bank of a (bad) check in that amount, as well as final credit of $163.58 . . . In fact, no bank should have honored a $121,345.11 check written against $163.58 in actual funds and . . . The fact that the Bank did so provides no basis in law or equity to avoid more than $163.58 of the transfer . . . When FWNB made payment on check number 1141, the Debtor’s checking account contained only $163.58 of . . . granting summary judgment in favor of Baker & Schultz and limiting the Trustee’s preference recovery to $163.58 . . .

In D. SMITH, J. D. G. L. R. BOYER,, 966 F.2d 1527 (7th Cir. 1992)

. . . $125,000 based upon its deposit with the Bank of a (bad) check in that amount, as well as final credit of $163.58 . . . In fact, no bank should have honored a $121,345.11 check written against $163.58 in actual funds and . . . The fact that the Bank did so provides no basis in law or equity to avoid more than $163.58 of the transfer . . . When FWNB made payment on check number 1141, the Debtor’s checking account contained only $163.58 of . . . granting summary judgment in favor of Baker & Schultz and limiting the Trustee’s preference recovery to $163.58 . . .

In SMITH d b a J. D. G. L. R. BOYER, v. BAKER SCHULTZ, INC., 123 B.R. 605 (N.D. Ind. 1991)

. . . the Debtor delivered check no. 1141 to Baker & Schultz, the Debtor’s checking account contained only $163.58 . . . made final payment to Baker & Schultz on check no. 1141, Debtor’s cheeking account contained only $163.58 . . . The Trustee’s preference recovery cannot exceed $163.58. . . . .

LITTLE v. STREATER, 452 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1981)

. . . $2 per month — $1 toward the arrearage amount of $6,974.48 and $1 toward a current monthly award of $163.58 . . .

W. J. ROBERTS CO. INC. s Co. Wm. H. Co. v. S. S. HELLENIC GLORY,, 471 F. Supp. 1002 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . They have one underclaim of $163.58, a difference of $35.76. . . .

F. BURNS A. v. UNITED STATES, 174 F. Supp. 203 (N.D. Ohio 1959)

. . . return for the year 1948, and when disallowed, they paid the deficiency of $1,707.08 plus interest of $163.58 . . .

BURNS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, 81 Ohio Law Abs. 14 (N.D. Ohio 1959)

. . . return for the year 1948, and when disallowed, they paid the deficiency of $1707.08 plus interest of $163.58 . . .

THE FARMERS LOAN TRUST CO. ISABELLE W. TILFORD, HENRY MORGAN TILFORD,, 3 B.T.A. 884 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . return was filed for that year, showing gross income of approximately $580,623.68, and deductions of $163.58 . . . reported the gross income of the estate at $580,720.62, and allowable deductions as follows: Interest, $163.58 . . .