The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIII
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 189
UNIFORM SPECIAL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 189.06

189.06 Legislative intent; centralized location.—It is the intent of the Legislature through the adoption of this chapter to have one centralized location for all legislation governing special districts and to:

(1) Improve the enforcement of statutes currently in place that help ensure the accountability of special districts to state and local governments.

(2) Improve communication and coordination between state agencies with respect to required special district reporting and state monitoring.

(3) Improve communication and coordination between special districts and other local entities with respect to ad valorem taxation, non-ad valorem assessment collection, special district elections, and local government comprehensive planning.

(4) Move toward greater uniformity in special district elections and non-ad valorem assessment collection procedures at the local level without hampering the efficiency and effectiveness of the current procedures.

(5) Clarify special district definitions and creation methods in order to ensure consistent application of those definitions and creation methods across all levels of government.

(6) Specify in general law the essential components of any new type of special district.

(7) Specify in general law the essential components of a charter for a new special district.

(8) Encourage the creation of municipal service taxing units and municipal service benefit units for providing municipal services in unincorporated areas of each county.

History.—s. 2, ch. 89-169; s. 8, ch. 2014-22.

Note.—Former s. 189.402(2).

F.S. 189.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 189.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 189.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 189.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 189.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WHITE, v. WHITE,, 893 F. Supp. 2d 755 (E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . transcripts; (c) $750.00 in fees for the deposition of the child’s treating physician, Irene Chatoor; (d) $189.06 . . .

NORMAN v. ST. CLAIR NORMAN, v. ST. CLAIR WILLIAMS v. ST. CLAIR, 610 F.2d 1228 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . As these figures suggest, $189.06 of Mrs. Norman’s income is deemed available to Mr. . . . Plaintiffs contend that $189.06 is not in fact available to Mr. . . .

J. GOLDBERG, v. AMARILLO GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO., 214 F. Supp. 74 (N.D. Tex. 1963)

. . . checks of July 16th, July 23rd and July 30th, on which dates he was paid wages of $172.38, $204.24 and $189.06 . . .

SPRUCE v. WHITE, 45 F. Supp. 842 (S.D.W. Va. 1942)

. . . It was shown that in September and October, 1939, some small quantities amounting to $189.06 were cut . . .

v., 144 Fla. 791 (Fla. 1940)

. . . further averred that on January 24, 1939, there was due plaintiff on account of said tax deed only $189.06 . . .

THE WISCONSIN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 27 Ct. Cl. 440 (Ct. Cl. 1892)

. . . being $17.10 per mile for 33.50 miles (lap), $111.15 per mile for 127.16 miles, and $88.92 per mile for 189.06 . . .