The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 206
MOTOR AND OTHER FUEL TAXES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 206.04

206.04 License number and cards; penalties.—Each terminal supplier, importer, exporter, and wholesaler shall be assigned a license number upon qualifying for a license hereunder, and the department shall issue to each such licensee separate license cards for each tank truck operated by that person. Such license card shall indicate the license number so assigned, the motor number of the truck authorized to be operated under such license card, and such other information as the department may prescribe. The license card shall be conspicuously displayed in the vehicle to which it is assigned, and any person operating a tank truck in this state conveying or transporting motor fuel without such license card or, if a common carrier, a bill of lading is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—s. 2, ch. 16082, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 1167(63), 7794(5); s. 7, ch. 63-253; s. 5, ch. 65-371; s. 2, ch. 65-420; ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-995; s. 116, ch. 71-136; s. 82, ch. 85-342; s. 71, ch. 87-6; s. 6, ch. 95-417.

Note.—Former s. 207.05.

F.S. 206.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 206.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 206.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 206.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S206.04 - MOVING TRAFFIC VIOL - TRANSPORT FUEL WO LICENSE OR BILL OF LADING - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ,, 297 F. Supp. 3d 1139 (D. Colo. 2017)

. . . See OMS 206.04(2). (Doc. # 18-1 at 6.) . . .

BLUNT, S. H. W. W. S. H. R. C. Q. G. W. W. NAACP v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT S. H. W. W. R. C. Q. G. No. S. H. W. W. S. H. R. C. Q. G. W. W. NAACP v. No. S. H. W. W. S. H. R. C. Q. G. W. W. NAACP v. No., 767 F.3d 247 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . See 19-206 Pratt, Moore’s Federal Practice—Civil § 206.04 (2013). . . . .

LAIDLEY, a v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a, 798 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Colo. 2011)

. . . See Denver Police Operations Manual, Section 206.04(1), Exhibit 1 to Reply to Motion to Dismiss (“Vehicles . . .

In REDONDO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v., 411 B.R. 89 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2009)

. . . and that type of seal, as well as the method of payment of concrete Class A, as set forth in Sections 206.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DONOVAN, D., 156 F. Supp. 2d 406 (D. Del. 2001)

. . . Hill, 976 F.2d 132, 134 (3d Cir.1992); 19 Moore’s Federal Practice 206.04[1]. . . .

WEEKOTY, v. UNITED STATES, 30 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (D.N.M. 1998)

. . . the district court or to the court of appeals”) (footnotes omitted); 19 Moore’s Federal Practice § 206.04 . . .

In R. PADILLA, SMYRNOS, v. R. PADILLA, Ch., 213 B.R. 349 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1997)

. . . The second amended plan again increased the monthly payments slightly, to $206.04. . . .

N. COLWELL, R. H. Jr. v. SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, 967 F. Supp. 1419 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . receive as future compensatory damages $288.46 per week until he is promoted, Ellinger will receive $206.04 . . . Ellinger: (a) $31,378.50 in back pay; (b) $65,683.00 in past compensatory damages; (c) weekly payments of $206.04 . . .

BAKERTOWN COAL COMPANY, INC. ET AL v. THE UNITED STATES, 202 Ct. Cl. 842 (Ct. Cl. 1973)

. . . FY 7-31-66 8,672.86 Bill Ray & Jo Ann Lester. 1966 103.71 Cherie Lester, Infant_ 1966 206.04 Tina Rhea . . . Lester, Infant_ 1966 206.04 Charles R. & Tony Lester_ 1966 4,041.38 William M. & Juanita Lester_ 1966 . . . Lester, Infant-1966 206.04 Sandra Lynn Lester, Infant_ 1966 228.69 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALLEN, 123 U.S. 345 (U.S. 1887)

. . . refused, in the settlement of said claim, [under the act of 1883,] to allow claimant the further sum of $206.04 . . . be unauthorized by law; and, without considering the merits of the question made as to the item of $206.04 . . . pleadings and findings in the present case what is the precise question raised in respect to the item of $206.04 . . . Said accounting officers refused in the settlement of said claim to allow claimant the further sum of $206.04 . . .

ROBERT W. ALLEN v. THE UNITED STATES, 22 Ct. Cl. 300 (Ct. Cl. 1887)

. . . A further sum of two hundred and six dollars and four cents ($206.04) would have accrued to claimant . . . that as he is entitled to the benefits of the longevity pay act of March 3, 1883, the further sum of $206.04 . . . , the first for $169.50, the second for $45.38, corresponding to the amounts here of $1,112.75 and $206.04 . . .