Cases from cite.case.law:

FORMAN, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 956 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . regarding the applicant’s eligibility for benefits, that caseworker has an affirmative duty under 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . imposed upon DCF by passage 1840.0110 of the policy manual is similar to that created by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

MAKE THE ROAD BY WALKING, INC. v. A. TURNER,, 378 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(iii); 18 N.Y. Comp.Codes R. & Reg. tit. 18, § 351.1(d). . . .

HENRIETTA D. S. A. S. R. R. v. R. BLOOMBERG, E., 331 F.3d 261 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 206.10(a)©; “ New York State Social Services Law and implementing regulations and administrative . . .

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, v. G. THOMPSON,, 321 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(1)(vii) (1996) (AFDC application need not include non-parents in assistance unit); see . . .

BRYSON v. SHUMWAY,, 177 F. Supp. 2d 78 (D.N.H. 2001)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)© to construe the phrase “reasonable promptness” in 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(10) as meaning . . .

HENRIETTA D. S. A. S. R. R. v. GIULIANI, E., 119 F. Supp. 2d 181 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . . § 206.10(a)©; New York State Social Services Law and implementing regulations and administrative directives . . .

G. HERNANDEZ, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 764 So. 2d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . .

FORD, v. SHALALA,, 87 F. Supp. 2d 163 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . . §§ 205.10(a)(4)(i)(B) and 206.10(a)(4). . . .

BOATMAN v. HAMMONS, K. Jr., 164 F.3d 286 (6th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court. . . .

ALEXANDER, v. BRITT, T., 89 F.3d 194 (4th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 206.10, and to monitor local departments’ compliance. . . .

KULPA, KULPA v. E. GLASS,, 903 F. Supp. 321 (N.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(A) with 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(24); and (3) that all claims accruing prior to November . . .

ELIZABETH BLACKWELL HEALTH CENTER FOR WOMEN s CHOICE, v. KNOLL, F. P. F. P., 61 F.3d 170 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(ll)). . . .

LAMPKIN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 886 F. Supp. 56 (D.D.C. 1995)

. . . . §§ 201.6(a), 233.120(a) and 206.10(a). . . .

ANDERSON, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, v. EDWARDS, EDWARDS,, 514 U.S. 143 (U.S. 1995)

. . . V); 45 CFR §206.10(a)(1)(vii) (1993). See generally Bowen v. Gilliard, 483 U. . . . are considered as a unit for purposes of determining eligibility and the amount of payment.” 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . are considered “as a unit” for purposes of determining the amount of the assistance payment. 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .

ROBIDOUX, v. KITCHEL,, 876 F. Supp. 575 (D. Vt. 1995)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). Vermont has prescribed thirty days as a time limit. . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3); 7 C.F.R. § 273.2(g). . . . applications within “reasonable” state-established time standards, not in excess of 45 days. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . reasonable time prescribed by the state regulations, but in no time greater than 45 days. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

MOREL, v. W. GIULIANI, J., 927 F. Supp. 622 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(12), 7 C.F.R. § 271.4, and New York State Soc.Serv.Law §§ 20 & 34. . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(12); 7 C.F.R. § 271.4; New York State Soc.Serv.Law §§ 20 & 34. . . .

BLANCO, L. a v. ANDERSON, S., 39 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i), and specify that the application be processed within 45 days of filing. 45 C.F.R . . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . postponement creates a three or four day delay beyond the 45 days permitted by the regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . shall be determined promptly “pursuant to reasonable State-established time standards.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . obtaining medical care and services in emergency situations on a 24-hour basis, 7 days a week. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

BROWN v. W. GIULIANI,, 158 F.R.D. 251 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . . §§ 206.10(a)(1), 233.120; N.Y.Soc. . . . individual’s circumstances that may affect the amount of assistance to which he is entitled. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . See 45 C.F.R. §§ 206.10(a)(12); 7 C.F.R. § 271.4. . . . after a report is obtained which indicates a change in the individual’s circumstances,” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . regulations as "the review of factors affecting [AFDC] eligibility or payment amount.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

WILKES W. v. R. GOMEZ,, 32 F.3d 1324 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 206.10(b)(5). One AFDC payment per month is made to each assistance unit. . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38); 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(1)(vii). . . .

ALBISTON, v. MAINE COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES,, 7 F.3d 258 (1st Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5). . . . eligible individuals without any delay attributable to the agency’s administrative process.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

WILKES W. v. STEFFEN,, 831 F. Supp. 723 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . . § 206.10(b)(5). . . . considered as a unit for purposes of determining eligibility and the amount of payment.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

ORRIS, v W. SULLIVAN, Dr. v. E. RUBIN, ORRIS, v. W. SULLIVAN, Dr. v. E. RUBIN,, 974 F.2d 109 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(1)(vii)(A), (B) (AFDC eligibility based on dependent child living in same household with . . .

ZEIEN, v. M. PALMER, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 955 F.2d 506 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(9)(ii) (1990). . . .

ROSAS, By v. McMAHON, W. M. D. ROSAS, By v. McMAHON, W. M. D., 945 F.2d 1469 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . 430, 108 S.Ct. 1306, 1314, 99 L.Ed.2d 515 (1988) (deferring to an agency interpretation that 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . such a rule might well represent sound policy, we do not believe that a fair reading of the text of § 206.10 . . .

PRATT, v. WILSON,, 770 F. Supp. 539 (E.D. Cal. 1991)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i) provides in pertinent part: "Financial assistance and medical care and services included . . .

V. CORNELIUS, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 936 F.2d 1143 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), benefits received by parents . . .

V. CORNELIUS, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 923 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), benefits received by parents . . .

O. TURNER, v. G. LEDBETTER,, 906 F.2d 606 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1987). In Gardebring v. . . . Title 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(7) provides that “[i]n cases of proposed action to terminate, discontinue . . .

McKENNEY, v. SULLIVAN,, 743 F. Supp. 53 (D. Me. 1990)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(A). . . .

G. L. An v. ZUMWALT,, 731 F. Supp. 365 (W.D. Mo. 1990)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . applications for AFDC within forty-five (45) days of the date of application in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . whose applications have not been processed within forty-five (45) days in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . That defendants shall not prematurely deny AFDC applications in violation of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3) . . .

LITTLE, v. COLER,, 557 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . consistent with federal law and thus a viable remedy for an imminent budget shortfall. 45 CFR section 206.10 . . .

GONZALEZ, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 558 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1988). In Pond v. . . .

STROOP B. B. P. L. v. R. BOWEN, D. STROOP B. B. P. L. v. D. JACKSON, R., 870 F.2d 969 (4th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1987). . . . .

JACKSON, FORREST, v. MULLANY, W. PERALES, v. R. BOWEN,, 708 F. Supp. 483 (N.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B). . . . See 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1986). . . . way the Secretary must clearly explain that compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) and 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

DOSTON, v. T. DUFFY,, 732 F. Supp. 857 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(10) requires states to determine eligibility in a manner consistent with the objectives . . . does not violate notice requirements of the due process clause of the Constitution or 45 C.F.R. §§ 206.10 . . . The Social Security Act at 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(10) and the federal regulations at 45 C.F.R. §§ 206.10( . . .

MOORE v. PERALES,, 692 F. Supp. 137 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i), and in food stamp cases, within 60 days, 7 C.F.R. § 273.15. . . .

ROSAS, By PEREZ, v. McMAHON, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 700 F. Supp. 467 (N.D. Cal. 1988)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) applies to this case. . . .

BUSSEY v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 526 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 206.10(6)(i)(A)(2) mandated that assistance begin within 30 days of the receipt of the application . . .

GARDEBRING, COMMISSIONER OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. JENKINS, 485 U.S. 415 (U.S. 1988)

. . . by a regulation promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary), 45 CFR §206.10 . . . See § 206.10(b)(1) (defining “applicant”). . . . .” § 206.10(a)(2)(ii) (emphasis added). . . . She points to §206.10(a)(1)(iii), which provides that “[a]n applicant may be assisted, if he so desires . . . (b)(4), and thus clearly applies to recipients, respondent contends that “applicant” is used in § 206.10 . . . informed about the eligibility requirements and their rights and obligations under the program.” 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . Secretary took a different position than the one he now maintains: “Federal regulations at 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . Provisions at 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(2)(i) do not require a State to publicize the lump sum rule or any other . . . The regulation at 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1987) refers only to “applicants,” not to “recipients.” . . . The regulation at 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(2)(ii) (1987) says: “Procedures shall be adopted which are designed . . .

BRADLEY, On v. E. AUSTIN,, 841 F.2d 1288 (6th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) (1986) and the corresponding Kentucky state regulations contravene the Social . . . Gilliard, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 3008, 3013, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987). . 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1986 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 522 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Finding, however, that HRS failed to comply with the provisions of section 206.10(a)(2)(i) of the federal . . . at the AFDC office advised applicants “of the broad spectrum of information as set forth in 45 CFR 206.10 . . . regarding the applicant’s eligibility for benefits, that caseworker has an affirmative duty under 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .

TODD v. A. NORMAN, R., 840 F.2d 608 (8th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1985); see also Gorrie v. Bowen, 809 F.2d 508 (8th Cir.1987). . . .

JOHNSON, v. COHEN, M. M. HECKLER,, 836 F.2d 798 (3d Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a) (1986). . . . adoptive parent, or stepparent ... and (B) [a]ny blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

CASTRO v. SUGARMAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 684 F. Supp. 646 (W.D. Wash. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(1) states that “Each individual wishing to do so shall have the opportunity to apply for . . . assistance without delay.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(1)© states that “Each individual may apply under whichever . . . Once an applicant applies, DSHS is required to determine eligibility. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 imposes this . . . The State is also required to give various notices under the AFDC program. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)© . . .

ROSADO, v. R. BOWEN, S., 698 F. Supp. 1191 (D.N.J. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) and New Jersey practice which include plaintiffs in AFDC assistance units, violate . . . determining AFDC eligibility violates 42 U.S.C. 601 et seq. and the implementing regulation, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . challenge the Secretary’s interpretation of section 402(a)(38) of DE-FRA as implemented by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

BUCKLEY, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, I, AFDC, 516 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . . the six-month grace period was an available option, we conclude that the duty to inform in section 206.10 . . . appellant has been erroneously deprived of benefits as the result of HRS’s failure to comply with rule 206.10 . . . legal proceedings to make an applicant eligible for benefits are not within the purview of 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .

BEASLEY, v. G. HARRIS, Jr. v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 671 F. Supp. 911 (D. Conn. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i), 232.20(d) and 302.-51(b)(1), as amended ... . . . § 602(a)(10)(A), and/or “without any delay attributable to the agency’s administrative process.” § 206.10 . . . A standard may not take into account bureaucratic delay. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(5)(i). . . . agency in providing traditional Title IV-A payments, i.e., prompt, see §§ 602(a)(10)(A); 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . Section 206.10(a)(5)(i) provides: Financial assistance and medical care and services included in the . . .

YELDER, v. P. HORNSBY, Jr., 666 F. Supp. 1518 (M.D. Ala. 1987)

. . . . §§ 232.20, 206.10(a)(9), 233.33. . . .

OLIVER, v. G. LEDBETTER,, 821 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1986), which requires that all parents and siblings living in the same household . . . state implementation of the AFDC filing provision, 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38), on grounds that 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . child’s application must also include any blood-related or adoptive brothers and sisters. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . adoptive parent, or stepparent ...; and (B) Any blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

BOWEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. GILLIARD, 483 U.S. 587 (U.S. 1987)

. . . See 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(1)(vii) (1986). . . . laws of general applicability); and “(B) Any blood-related or adoptive brother or sister.” 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .

POND, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, AFDC UNIT, 503 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) provides in pertinent part: Applicants shall be informed about the eligibility requirements . . . the applicant’s eligibility for benefits, that ease-worker has an affirmative duty under 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3)(i); rule 10C-1.-80(9), Florida Administrative Code. . . .

GORRIE, Jo v. R. BOWEN, W., 809 F.2d 508 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) (1985), requires a reading of 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) (Supp. . . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1985) (“family unit filing regulation”). . . . the court interpreted the portion of the Secretary’s regulation applicable- to parents, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

ELAM, v. BARRY,, 656 F. Supp. 140 (S.D. Ohio 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), interpreting 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) provides: For AFDC only, in order for the . . . 1-21-011, known as “the standard filing unit rule”, which interprets federal regulation 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

BALDWIN, v. G. LEDBETTER, R. M. D., 647 F. Supp. 623 (N.D. Ga. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B). . . .

SHOWERS, v. COHEN, R. M. D., 645 F. Supp. 217 (M.D. Pa. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(1)(vii)(B). . . .

COLLINS, v. K. BARRY,, 644 F. Supp. 249 (N.D. Ohio 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), the regulation, which became effective October 1, 1984, provides: For AFDC only . . . The neediness condition is incorporated in 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) by the phrase “and otherwise . . . The Court finds the most reasonable interpretation of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) to be that it incorporates . . .

SLAUGHTER v. LEVINE,, 801 F.2d 288 (8th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i), the court today concludes that the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare was legally . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). (Emphasis added). . . . We are therefore of the view that it is not “appropriate” within the meaning of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a) . . . However, the Secretary of HHS, during a notice and comment period on 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)(i) in 1978 . . . In short, we agree with the District Court that 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)(i) by its terms requires advance . . . In her response to interrogatories posed by the defendant, she states that under 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a . . .

LESKO, v. R. BOWEN,, 639 F. Supp. 1152 (E.D. Wis. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii). . . .

ORTIZ, v. P. EICHLER, T. s EICHLER, 794 F.2d 889 (3d Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(4) (1985): Adequate notice shall be sent to applicants and recipients to indicate that . . .

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES R. BRITT, v. R. BOWEN, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 648 F. Supp. 1017 (D. Md. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B), and a concomitant Maryland regulation, COMAR 07.03.02.02B(l)(a), altering the . . . On October 1, 1984, HHS implemented the new law through regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) . . . by the officials of the Maryland Department of Human Resources on § 2640 of DEFRA and on 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

GIBSON, v. SALLEE, 648 F. Supp. 54 (M.D. Tenn. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), which provides that for a child to be included in the AFDC unit pursuant to Section . . .

ARDISTER, a v. MANSOUR,, 627 F. Supp. 641 (W.D. Mich. 1986)

. . . . § 206.10. . . . otherwise eligible for assistance: (B) Any blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . interpretation of the statute is fully consistent with the HHS’ implementing regulation at 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

OLIVER, v. G. LEDBETTER, M., 624 F. Supp. 325 (N.D. Ga. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B). . . . The challenged regulation, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), simply effectuates this statutory mandate. . . .

SLAUGHTER, v. LEVINE, v. HECKLER,, 621 F. Supp. 509 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i), which provides in relevant part that: Applicants shall be informed about the eligibility . . . eligibility and appeals in simple, understandable terms are publicized and available in quantity. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

GORRIE, v. M. HECKLER, W., 624 F. Supp. 85 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (hereinafter “New Rule”), interpreting .section 2640(a) of the Deficit Reduction . . . blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 49 FecLReg. 35599 (Sept. 10, 1984), to be codified at 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . because of defendant Heckler’s new regulation issued September 10,1984 to be codified at 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . are available, within the definition of 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) (1984) as implemented by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . terminated because of Secretary Heckler’s regulations issued September 10, 1984 and codified at 45 C.F.R. 206.10 . . .

FRAZIER, v. PINGREE, M. U. S., 612 F. Supp. 345 (M.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . The defendants are enjoined from enforcing any regulation, including but not limited to 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .

CREATON, v. HECKLER,, 625 F. Supp. 26 (C.D. Cal. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii). 11. . . .

E. WATKINS, v. BLINZINGER,, 610 F. Supp. 1443 (S.D. Ind. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . .

SLAUGHTER, v. LEVINE, v. HECKLER,, 605 F. Supp. 1242 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . . as a supplement to written material, rather than vice versa, as the defendant proposes. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . provided by the defendants, as modified by the Court, clearly satisfies the requirements of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . has taken the position that prior written notice of the lump sum rule is not required by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . 3. the notice attached to the Court’s Order as Appendix A satisfies the requirements of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

GORRIE, On v. M. HECKLER, W., 606 F. Supp. 368 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (hereinafter “New Rule”), interpreting 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) (1984) (hereinafter . . .

SHONKWILER, L. v. HECKLER, L., 628 F. Supp. 1013 (S.D. Ind. 1985)

. . . . § 206.10 by adding the following: “For AFDC only, in order for the family to be eligible, an application . . .

SLAUGHTER, v. LEVINE, v. HECKLER,, 598 F. Supp. 1035 (D. Minn. 1984)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i), and the due process clause of the fifth and fourteenth amendments. . . . short of the requirement that applicants are to be advised of “conditions of eligibility.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . policy violates the federal regulation requiring notice of AFDC eligibility requirements, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . that those members of the class who had their AFDC benefits terminated in violation of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . In a statement made during a notice and comment period on section 206.10(a) in 1978, the Secretary of . . .

BARNES, v. COHEN, M. BETSON, HARRIS, T. E. v. HARRIS, J. M., 749 F.2d 1009 (3d Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(12). . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(12); 45 C.F.R. § 205.120(a)(1); Coleman v. . . .

W. MILLER E. L. L. M. E. C. M. F. B. R. M. N. E. H. A. F. H. L. Ed v. CUDAHY COMPANY, a a, 592 F. Supp. 976 (D. Ark. 1984)

. . . was] almost impossible to put a clamp on it that [did] not leak a little brine,” plaintiffs’ exhibit 206.10 . . .

KOSTER, Jr. La v. Y. WEBB, T. A. D, 598 F. Supp. 1134 (E.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . . §§ 205.10(a)(12), 206.10(a)(8); see also Davis v. . . . for written notice of any adverse determination of a request for emergency assistance. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

ALEXANDER, J. v. HILL, F. H., 707 F.2d 780 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . . §§ 205.120, 206.10(a)(12). . . . .

R. MURPHY, a k a v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, a, 558 F. Supp. 591 (D.N.D. 1983)

. . . Knudson_ 206.10 Deposition of Red Murphy_ 33.60 Filing Fee (3/25/82). 15.00 Expert Witness D.W. . . .

FORTIN, v. COMMISSIONER OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE,, 692 F.2d 790 (1st Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3) (1981). . . . notification of denial of assistance or change of award is mailed to the applicant or recipient. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . eligibility determinations of not more than forty-five days from the date of application. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

ALEXANDER, v. HILL,, 549 F. Supp. 1355 (W.D.N.C. 1982)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . . §§ 205.120 and 206.10(a)(12). . . . date the assistance check, or notice of denial of assistance, is mailed to the applicant. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . processing standard and defendants have failed to do so. 42 C.F.R. § 435.904, 45 C.F.R. §§ 205.120, 206.10 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 435.911, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3)(ii). 6. . . .

SIMPSON, v. MILLER, a, 535 F. Supp. 1041 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1981). However, it appears that IDPA does not have such a program. . . .

COALITION FOR BASIC HUMAN NEEDS, v. J. KING,, 654 F.2d 838 (1st Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 206.10(c)(5)(i). . . .

L. THOMPSON, R. J. J. S. v. R. FREEMAN, J., 648 F.2d 1144 (8th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3)(i) (1980). . . .

DENNIS, C. v. CHANG, PEREZ, v. CHANG, A. LYNCH v. CHANG, FORTUCCI, v. CHANG,, 611 F.2d 1302 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3)(i). In Perez v. . . .

E. HODGSON, M. D. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN E. E. E. E. F. Jr. S. J. Jr. COE, M. D. v. J. DIRKSWAGER, Jr., 614 F.2d 601 (8th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(11) (1978). . . . medical need. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396, 1396a(a)(10)(C)(i), (ii), 1396a(a)(17), 1396a(a)(19); 42 C.F.R. §§ 206.10 . . .

THOMPSON v. F. WALSH, 481 F. Supp. 1170 (W.D. Mo. 1979)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(iii). . . . Carter litigation, that “the time limits contained in 45 C.F.R. §. 206.10(a)(iii) prescribe a forty-five . . .

GRIFFIN v. HARRIS, 480 F. Supp. 1072 (E.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . .

STENSON, v. BLUM, Jr., 476 F. Supp. 1331 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . aid shall be continued regularly until an eligible individual is found to be ineligible, 45 C.F.R. 206.10 . . . Commissioners on State Responsibilities for Notifícation to Recipients, which in interpreting 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .

WELFARE RECIPIENTS, II, D. L. v. J. KING, H. T. F., 474 F. Supp. 1374 (D. Mass. 1979)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(9) requires in relevant part that “eligibility will be considered or redetermined: . . . . . sufficiently relevant to current circumstances to trigger a redetermination pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . However, even if the requirements of § 206.10(a)(9)(ii) and § 303.52(c) were not met by the computer . . . (a)(12)(iii)(a), and authorized termination of assistance for refusal to consent, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10( . . . that states would develop methods of verifying eligibility subject to the general constraints of § 206.10 . . .

MORGAN v. W. MAHER,, 449 F. Supp. 229 (D. Conn. 1978)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5) (1976). . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3) (1976); Class v. Norton, 507 F.2d 1058 (2d Cir. 1974). . . .

PEREZ, v. CHANG,, 438 F. Supp. 238 (D. Haw. 1977)

. . . and by not using Plaintiffs as the primary sources of information, Defendants have violated 45 C.F.R. 206.10 . . .

HOWELL, v. L. TRAINOR,, 432 F. Supp. 1235 (N.D. Ill. 1977)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(5). . . .

JORDAN v. L. TRAINOR,, 551 F.2d 152 (7th Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 206.10 in force on the date of application.” . . .

MARTINEZ v. L. TRAINOR,, 435 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1976)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(12), he is obliged to: establish and maintain methods by which [he] shall be kept currently . . .

DOE v. F. MATHEWS,, 422 F. Supp. 141 (D.D.C. 1976)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(7) (1975). . . .

PEREZ v. LAVINE, R., 412 F. Supp. 1340 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . . § 206.10 Application, determination of eligibility and furnishing of assistance. . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(iv)(c). . . . As mentioned previously, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(1) dictates that the opportunity to apply be afforded . . . Transcript at 422. . 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 further provides: (a)(2)(ii) Procedures shall be adopted which . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(b)(2). . . .

ROLDAN v. A. MINTER,, 409 F. Supp. 663 (D. Mass. 1976)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(10); 45 C.F.R. § 233.10(a)(1)(h) and (vii) (1975). . . .

WILLIAMS v. WOHLGEMUTH, 400 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . . § 206.10(5) provides: Financial assistance and medical care and services included in the plan shall . . .

JORDAN v. TRAINOR,, 405 F. Supp. 802 (N.D. Ill. 1975)

. . . . § 206.10. . . .

WOODRUFF, v. LAVINE,, 399 F. Supp. 1008 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)

. . . . § 206.10(a)(2). 45 C.F.R. § 249.10(a) (5) (ii) imposes a further requirement that the State assure . . .