The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . indictment for. a defect in the grand jury proceedings under New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 210.35 . . . presumption The trial court dismissed the indictment against Plaintiff under New York Criminal Procedure Law 210.35 . . . The New York Court of Appeals has made clear that section 210.35(5) dismissals protect against “unfounded . . . Jones, Minott, and Cox — however, involved a dismissal under New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 210.35 . . . suggest that a lesser standard should be applied to dismissals under Criminal Procedure Law Section 210.35 . . .
. . . Fox moved to dismiss the indictment pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law §§ 210.20(l)(e) and 210.35 . . .
. . . Giving Unlawful Gratuities — Class A Misdemeanor 210.05 Perjury in the 3rd Degree — Class A Misdemeanor 210.35 . . .
. . . Jury proceedings which would warrant the dismissal of any counts of the Indictment pursuant to CPL § 210.35 . . .
. . . March 23, 2006, pursuant to New York State Criminal Procedure Law (“NYCPL”) Sections 210.20(c) and 210.35 . . .
. . . ineffective because he failed to make a timely motion pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law (“CPL”) § 210.35 . . . defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury must be dismissed if a motion is made pursuant to CPL § 210.35 . . . constitutionally ineffective because his motion to dismiss the indictment was untimely under CPL § 210.35 . . .
. . . . § 210.35 (McKinney 1993). . . . L. § 210.35 (McKinney 1994). . . .
. . . . § 210.20(c) and § 210.35(5) (McKinney 1993). . . .
. . . (CPL §§ 210.35[5] and 190.25[6]). Memorandum Decision of Judge Santagata, dated June 29, 1990. . . .
. . . request is made in time to give the Reserve Bank a reasonable opportunity to comply, 12 C.F.R. sec. 210.35 . . .
. . . . § 210.35), while heating oil (# 2 oil) and diesel fuels (# 2-D fuel) became exempt on July 1, 1976, . . . (June 16, 1976) (codified at 10 C.F.R. § 210.35). . . .
. . . . §§ 210.35 and 190.50(5) because he was denied the opportunity to testify before the grand jury on his . . . error in grand jury proceedings renders, the indictment automatically defective pursuant to C.P.L. § 210.35 . . . N.Y.C.P.L. § 210.35, subpar. 4. VII. Petitioner’s claim is federally cognizable. . . . N.Y.C.P.L. § 210.35 reads as follows: A grand jury proceeding is defective within the meaning of paragraph . . . Under subparagraphs 1 through 4 of § 210.35 the grand jury proceeding is by operation of law defective . . .
. . . DATE WHOM MADE AMOUNT DESIGNATION 3/5/86 Ruston Flying Service $145.60 Fuel 3/4/86 Fleeman Aviation $210.35 . . .
. . . . § 210.35(a); nor do they address the “final payment” criteria in 12 C.F.R. § 210.36(a). . . .
. . . . § 210.35 (1980), 41 Fed. . . . . § 210.35 (1980), 41 Fed.Reg. 13896 (April 1, 1976). . . .
. . . . §§ 210.35, 212.56-62); all other petroleum products having been exempted in accordance with the procedures . . . 5, 1979); and butane and natural gasoline. 44 Fed.Reg. 70118 (Dec. 6, 1979) Codified at 10 C.F.R. § 210.35 . . .
. . . . §§ 210.35, 212.56-.62. . . .
. . . . § 210.35(d)(1) and (2). . . .
. . . . § 210.35. . . .
. . . thereof upon the ground that: (c) The grand jury proceeding was defective, within the meaning of section 210.35 . . .
. . . . §] 210.35” or if “[t]he defendant has immunity with respect to the offense charged, pursuant to section . . .
. . . Judgment was rendered upon special findings and conclusions of law in the amount of $210.35 in favor . . .
. . . petition the Bankrupt stated that his income from trade or profession in 1956 was $378.20 and in 1957 was $210.35 . . .
. . . per folio, amounting to $9,222.30,” and for disbursements made in connection therewith amounting to $210.35 . . . supervisor’s offices, 61,482 folios, at 15 cents per folio, $9,222.30, and for disbursements amounting to $210.35 . . . and supplies necessarily used in and about the entering and indexing of said records, amounting to $210.35 . . .
. . . per folio, amounting to $9222.30,” and for disbursements made in connection therewith amounting to $210.35 . . . supervisor’s offices 61,482 folio, at 15 cents per folio, $9222.30, and for disbursements amounting to $210.35 . . . and supplies necessarily used in and about the entering and indexing of said records, amounting to $210.35 . . .
. . . being 61,482 folios, at 15 cents per folio, amounting to $9,222.30, and for necessary-stationery, $210.35 . . .
. . . that the tug is responsible for the damage, and that the libelants are entitled to a decree for $13,-210.35 . . .