The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 211
TAX ON PRODUCTION OF OIL AND GAS AND SEVERANCE OF SOLID MINERALS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 211.18

211.18 Records.—It shall be the duty of the clerk of the circuit court to keep a record book to be provided by the board of county commissioners of the county for the purpose of accepting for record any subsurface owner’s interest in real estate of said county and any owner of subsurface interest in the lands of said county may register with the clerk the name of such owner, his or her address, the description of the land in which the owner has subsurface interest and such recording shall entitle such subsurface owner to notice by registered mail with return receipt requested of nonpayment of taxes by the surface owner, sale of tax certificates affecting the surface of said lands, application for tax deed of the surface interest and any foreclosure proceedings against said lands for unpaid taxes thereon, and no tax deed nor foreclosure proceedings shall affect such subsurface owner’s interest if the notice hereby provided for is not given. For the clerk’s services in registering such subsurface owner’s interest as herein provided, the clerk shall receive a fee of $1, plus the fee per page for recording now provided by law. Where an owner of a subsurface interest or interests has registered with the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which said subsurface interest is located, the name of such owner, his or her address, and the description of the land in which the owner has subsurface interests pursuant to the provisions of chapter 22784, Acts of 1945, such registration shall be and operate as a registration of his or her subsurface interests and shall entitle the owner thereof to the notices and immunities hereinabove provided the same as if such owner had registered with said clerk his or her subsurface interests under and pursuant to this chapter.

History.—s. 14, ch. 22784, 1945; s. 14, ch. 23883, 1947; s. 1106, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 211.18 on Google Scholar

F.S. 211.18 on Casetext

Amendments to 211.18

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 211.18

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 211.18.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL, CLS v. ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD., 717 F.3d 1269 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

. . . See, e.g., id. col. 20 1.54-col. 211.18. . . .

MAGSIL CORPORATION v. HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 687 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at col. 211.18-22. . . .

MEISTER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 623 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 219.10(d), 211.18. 2. The Service issued a management plan for the Forests in 1986. . . .

CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY Of v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 341 F.3d 961 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 211.18 (1988)). . . .

HIGH COUNTRY RESOURCES v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 255 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 211.18. . . .

MONTANA SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION v. C. WILDES,, 103 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (D. Mont. 2000)

. . . The Record of Decision stated that the Forest Plan was subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 211.18 within . . .

MANKE LUMBER CO. Mt. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 45 Fed. Cl. 157 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . . §§ 211.18, 223.182 (1985). . . .

MANKE LUMBER CO. Mt. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 44 Fed. Cl. 219 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . . § 211.18(c) (1985) . . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(a), (b), (c). . . . Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(c) plaintiff filed its notice of appeal with the Regional Forester, the . . . Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(r), the Chief affirmed the decision of the deciding officer by letter . . . Part 24, dealing with the Board of Contract Appeals, not 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 as required by the FTCPMA . . .

TUCSON ROD AND GUN CLUB, v. McGEE, U. S., 25 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Ariz. 1998)

. . . . § 211.18(b)(9), where the relief sought is an award of monetary damages, decisions are excluded from . . .

KENTUCKY HEARTWOOD, INC. v. WORTHINGTON,, 20 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (E.D. Ky. 1998)

. . . . § 211.18 (1985)(the 1985 regulations governing administrative appeals of the Forest Plan and the EIS . . .

WILDERNESS SOCIETY, v. E. ALCOCK, U. S., 83 F.3d 386 (11th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 211.18(f)(l)(iii). The Chief responds to the challenge in a written decision. . . . . § 211.18(f)(2), who has discretion to review the Chief's decision. . . .

LODGE TOWER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. LODGE PROPERTIES, INC. F. Jr. E. F., 880 F. Supp. 1370 (D. Colo. 1995)

. . . . § 211.18(h)(4)(i) (1994). I hold that no such violation occurred here. . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. J. MARITA,, 46 F.3d 606 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 219.10(d), 211.18. . . .

WILDERNESS SOCIETY, a a v. F. ROBERTSON, F. L. a a, 824 F. Supp. 947 (D. Mont. 1993)

. . . . §§ 211.18(3) and 217.5, no final determination occurred. . . . of Forest Officers concerning the National Forest System were subject to appeal in 1985. 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . Written notice was required to be given to Borax. 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(a)(2). . . . persons was permitted to be given through publication in a newspaper of general circulation. 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . .

BAR MK RANCHES K. S. W. v. YUETTER, F. U. S., 994 F.2d 735 (10th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 211.18(f) (1987), Plaintiffs appealed the decision to the Intermountain Regional Forester, contesting . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(q). . . . See id. § 211.18(f)(1)(H). . . . We review the district court’s interpretation of § 211.18(r) de novo. Dodson v. . . . Second, reading § 211.18(r) in conjunction with § 211.18(p), further supports the Forest Service’s construction . . .

HOLY CROSS WILDERNESS FUND, v. R. MADIGAN, R. F. O. E. R. III, J., 960 F.2d 1515 (10th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 211.18, the decision of the Regional Forester was appealed to the Chief of the Forest Service. . . .

PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 24 Cl. Ct. 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991)

. . . . §§ 211.18 and 223.182 (1986), which authorize agency review of Forest Service buy-out determinations . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(f)(2)—(6) (1989). . . .

PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 945 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991)

. . . . §§ 211.18 and 223.182 (1986), which authorize agency review of Forest Service buy-out determinations . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(f)(2)-(6) (1989). . . .

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL v. J. DEVLIN,, 776 F. Supp. 1440 (D. Or. 1991)

. . . Plaintiffs had 45 days to appeal, but did not do so. 36 CFR 211.18. . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. J. MARITA F. B., 769 F. Supp. 287 (E.D. Wis. 1991)

. . . Plaintiffs' administrative appeal was conducted under the Forest Service appeal regulations at 36 CFR 211.18 . . . Under 36 CFR 211.18, an appellant must file a notice of appeal that identifies the decision being appealed . . . , 36 CFR 211.18(e), and a statement of reasons in support of the appeal, 36 CFR 211.-18(c). . . . Finally, any person or organization may submit comments to be included in the record. 36 CFR 211.18(k . . . See 36 CFR 211.18(k). . . . .

LOCKHART, v. KENOPS, F., 927 F.2d 1028 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 211.18. . . . case back to the Regional Forester for supplementation of the administrative record under 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . Secretary of Agriculture declined to review that determination, the decision became final under 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . appeal process and request additional information, or remand the case for further action.” 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . .

SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 22 Cl. Ct. 54 (Cl. Ct. 1990)

. . . Section 211.18 provides that forest officer decisions are subject to various levels of appeal. . . . Under § 211.18(f) (1) (iii), decisions of a regional forester are appealed to the Chief of the Forest . . . by the Chief are then subject to discretionary review by the Secretary of Agriculture. 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . decision becomes the final administrative determination of the Department of Agriculture. 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . determination of the Department of Agriculture until the levels of appeal set forth in 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . .

HAVASUPAI TRIBE, v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 1471 (D. Ariz. 1990)

. . . . § 211.18. Appellants also sought a stay of site preparation and drilling pending the appeal. . . . appealed from the Regional Forester’s decision to the Chief of the Forest Service, pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . .

PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 19 Cl. Ct. 691 (Cl. Ct. 1990)

. . . determination became the final administrative decision of the Department of Agriculture. 36 C.F.R. 211.18 . . .

McCLELLAN ECOLOGICAL SEEPAGE SITUATION MESS v. B. CHENEY,, 763 F. Supp. 431 (E.D. Cal. 1989)

. . . . § 211.18(f)(1), which gave the plaintiff a right of administrative appeal. 834 F.2d at 846. . . .

CITIZENS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, v. UNITED STATES, A. U. S. F. U. S. E. U. S., 731 F. Supp. 970 (D. Colo. 1989)

. . . . § 211.18(f)(4), (6). VI. . . .

KOLA, INC. v. UNITED STATES K. F. U. S. G. Jr. L., 882 F.2d 361 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 211.18(f)(i) were denied in June and November 1986. . . .

ROBERTSON, CHIEF OF THE FOREST SERVICE, v. METHOW VALLEY CITIZENS COUNCIL, 490 U.S. 332 (U.S. 1989)

. . . See 36 CFR § 211.18 (1988). After a hearing, he affirmed the Regional Forester’s decision. . . .

COTTON PETROLEUM CORP. v. NEW MEXICO, 490 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1989)

. . . 211.12, 211.13(a), and provide for Interior Department inspection of lessees’ premises and records, § 211.18 . . .

WILDERNESS SOCIETY, s v. R. TYRREL, F., 701 F. Supp. 1473 (E.D. Cal. 1988)

. . . Id. at § 211.18(f)). . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(f)(6) ("Decisions at the final level of review constitute the final administrative . . .

UNITED STATES v. MEANS, a k a A. MEANS, F. v. MATHERS, R., 858 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 211.18(b)(3) precludes administrative appeal of issues being litigated in federal district court, . . .

SIERRA CLUB, a a a v. E. LYNG, F. E. M., 694 F. Supp. 1260 (E.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . even-aged management system until 45 days after receipt of a final decision, pursuant to 36 C.F.R. 211.18 . . . meaningful appeal on the merits. 3) Any other factors the Reviewing Officer may consider relevant. 36 C.F.R. 211.18 . . .

PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 15 Cl. Ct. 11 (Cl. Ct. 1988)

. . . determination became the final administrative decision of the Department of Agriculture. 36 C.F.R. 211.18 . . .

INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. E. LYNG, J. S. MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION, a v. F. ROBERTSON, J. S., 683 F. Supp. 1330 (D. Wyo. 1988)

. . . . § 211.18(f). . . .

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL v. U. S. FOREST SERVICE, 834 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 211.18(a)(1). . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(c)(1). . . . Since plaintiffs failed to appeal the original decision in a timely manner, see id. § 211.18(c)(1), the . . . of the North Roaring Devil sale does not constitute a ‘decision’ within the meaning of 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . The reoffer by the USFS of a returned timber sale is a decision within the meaning of 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . .

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL, INC. v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 659 F. Supp. 1441 (D. Or. 1987)

. . . . § 211.18(c). . . . Administrative Appeal 36 C.F.R. § 211.18(a)(1) provides: the “[decisions of Forest Officers concerning . . . According to plaintiffs, a reoffer constitutes an appealable decision within the meaning of 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . . of the North Roaring Devil sale does not constitute a “decision” within the meaning of 36 C.F.R. § 211.18 . . .

K. ANDERSON, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, B. UNITED STATES v. K. ANDERSON,, 645 F. Supp. 3 (E.D. Cal. 1985)

. . . Regional Forester of the Big Bar Ranger District’s May 13, 1985 removal decision permitted by 36 C.F.R. 211.18 . . .

In CONTINENTAL CREDIT CORPORATION, H. GEIGER, v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD,, 1 B.R. 680 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1979)

. . . . § 211.18 provides in part as follows: “Each supervisor or other assessing officer . . . shall ascertain . . . Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 211.18. . . .