Cases from cite.case.law:

KODIAK OIL GAS USA INC. HRC LLC v. BURR S. EOG S., 932 F.3d 1125 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 211.25, 212.25, the duration of leases, id. §§ 211.27, 212.27, the spacing of oil wells, id. § 212.28 . . .

KARIM- PANAHI, v. MASSACHUSETTS APARTMENTS, 302 F. Supp. 3d 330 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Plaintiff concludes: "the reason that the above amount of $211.25 per month is not deducted from rent . . .

TESSERA, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, USA U. S. A., 646 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.211.25-26, 59-61. . . .

ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH U. S. v. SEBELIUS,, 775 F. Supp. 2d 114 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . (drugs); § 211.25(c) ("There shall be an adequate number of qualified personnel to perform and supervise . . .

LIVINGSTON, v. WYETH, INCORPORATED, 520 F.3d 344 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 211.25. . . . Id. § 211.25(a). Training must be “conducted by qualified individuals on a continuing basis.” Id. . . . Id. § 211.25(b). . . . fact, lacked training, thus allowing them to manufacture adulterated drugs in violation of 21 C.F.R. § 211.25 . . . . § 211.25. . . .

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, v., 471 F. Supp. 2d 667 (N.D.W. Va. 2007)

. . . . §§ 211.25 and 211.28 are the only regulations promulgated by the FDA that address personnel qualifications . . . While § 211.25 requires that "[e]ach person engaged in the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding . . .

WRIGHT, v. FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER,, 269 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (W.D. Wash. 2002)

. . . . §§ 211.25 and 211.180, 21 C.F.R. §§ 601.2 and 610.1), and the heads of various governmental departments . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. G. v. FOX, II,, 129 F. Supp. 2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Izeman’s hours to 74.75 in 1997, 211.25 in 1998, 259 in 1999, and 58.5 in 2000. 2. . . .

SIEGEL OIL COMPANY, v. RICHARDSON,, 208 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 211.25 (1975). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARGENT CHEMICAL LABORATORIES, INC. A, NE,, 93 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . . §§ 211.25, 211.28; buildings and facilities specifications, 21 C.F.R. §§ 211.42-211.58; equipment specifications . . .

LOGAN KANAWHA COAL COMPANY, INC. v. BANQUE FRANCAISE DU COMMERCE EXTERIEUR, CTC-, 868 F. Supp. 63 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . . § 211.25(a). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RICHLYN LABORATORIES, INC. a S., 822 F. Supp. 268 (E.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . personnel in current good manufacturing practices by qualified individuals is also expected. 21 C.F.R. 211.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RICHLYN LABORATORIES, INC. a S. An, 827 F. Supp. 1145 (E.D. Pa. 1992)

. . . personnel in current good manufacturing practices by qualified individuals is also expected. 21 C.F.R. 211.25 . . .

In BERNARD HILL, INC., 133 B.R. 61 (Bankr. D. Md. 1991)

. . . and the requested compensation therefor, (which the firm voluntarily reduced significantly from $82,-211.25 . . .

KARR L. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 924 F.2d 1018 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . The amounts represented accrual of the notes and cash payments due on 211.25 partnership units, determined . . .

B. v. L. v., 91 T.C. 733 (T.C. 1988)

. . . The amount represented accrual of the note and cash payments due to Sci-Teck on 211.25 units, determined . . . This amount represented the accrual of the note and cash payments due to FTRD on 211.25 units, determined . . .

JOHN D. COPANOS AND SONS, INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION E. M. D. Ph. D., 854 F.2d 510 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . equipment and utensils to be cleaned, maintained, and sanitized at “appropriate intervals”); id. at § 211.25 . . .

In EISENBARTH,, 77 B.R. 228 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1987)

. . . less, are proposed to be paid in full on the date of distribution, as follows: Edward Grunett, CPA, $211.25 . . .

In AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 611 F. Supp. 1296 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . The total fee award would thus increase from $763,678.12 to $850,-211.25. B. . . .

HYDROCARBON TRADING AND TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC. v. EXXON CORPORATION,, 570 F. Supp. 1177 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . Exxon also relies on sections 211.23 and 211.25(b) which provide- as follows: 211.23. . . . . § 211.23 (1980). 211.25(b). . . . . § 211.25(b) (1980). This reliance is misplaced. . . . provision, wherein section 211.9(a) is contained, and a subpart A provision, such as sections 211.23 and 211.25 . . . See, e.g., 10 C.F.R. §§ 211.51, 211.-10(b)(2)(h), 211.23, 211.25; Pester Refining Co., 4 DOE ¶ 80,164 . . .

In FINE PAPER ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 98 F.R.D. 48 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . He asks compensation for 211.25 hours essentially spent taking Mead depositions and reviewing documents . . .

SIEGEL OIL COMPANY, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION,, 701 F.2d 149 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 211.25, by substituting Acorn Petroleum, Inc. . . . it through another supplier or suppliers in accordance with normal business practices. 10 C.F.R. § 211.25 . . .

SIEGEL OIL COMPANY, a v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, a, 556 F. Supp. 302 (D. Colo. 1982)

. . . . § 211.25. . . . of petroleum products was discontinued on January 28, 1981. 42 Fed.Reg. 9909 (1981). . 10 C.F.R. § 211.25 . . .