Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 213.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 213.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 213.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 213
STATE REVENUE LAWS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 213.10
213.10 Deposit of tax moneys collected.Any and all tax moneys collected by the Department of Revenue shall be deposited in the appropriate fund as provided by law. Except as otherwise provided, the Department of Revenue may use separate clearing trust funds to account for the collection and distribution of tax moneys.
History.s. 10, ch. 63-253; ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 15, ch. 93-233.

F.S. 213.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 213.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 213.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 213.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 213.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES, v. B. HENNIS,, 75 M.J. 796 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 2016)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(2) (1982)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DREYER,, 804 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(3) (1982). . . . Compare 32 C.F.R. § 213.10(a)(3) (1982) (“Restrictions on direct assistance.”), with 32 C.F.R. § 182.6 . . . Hitchcock explained that 32 C.F.R. § 213.10 (1982) was merely “a prior version of DoD Directive 5525.5 . . . Cir.1994) ("[T]he Posse Comitatus Act applies to the Navy through [10 U.S.C. § ] 375 and 32 C.F.R. § 213.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DREYER,, 767 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 213.10, a regulation that has since been withdrawn. See 58 Fed.Reg. 25,776 (Apr. 28, 1993). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HITCHCOCK,, 286 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 213.10, a regulation that has since been withdrawn. . . . Section 213.10 embodied a prior version of DoD Directive 5525.5. See id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HITCHCOCK,, 263 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 213.10, a regulation that has since been withdrawn. See Removal of Parts, 58 Fed. . . . Section 213.10 embodied a prior version of DoD Directive 5525.5. See id. . . .

HARDEBECK, v. WARNER- JENKINSON COMPANY, INC., 108 F. Supp. 2d 1062 (E.D. Mo. 2000)

. . . distress (Count II), and sexual harassment in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), § 213.10 . . .

CARY OIL CO. INC. v. MG REFINING AND MARKETING, INC., 90 F. Supp. 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . (Ct.Cl. 1974) (non sale of goods agreement); 1 Weinstein, Korn & Miller, New York Civil Practice ¶ 213.10 . . .

ELLIS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 84 F.3d 1413 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . D.C.Mun.Regs. tit. 28, § 213.10. . . .

UNITED STATES v. KAHN, 35 F.3d 426 (9th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 213.10. . . . . § 213.10. . . . . § 213.10(a)(7)). . . .

M. JERSILD J. v. E. AKER J., 775 F. Supp. 1198 (E.D. Wis. 1991)

. . . hours billed by junior attorneys has been reduced from 34.55 to 30, for senior legal assistants from 213.10 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. A. THOMPSON, U. S., 33 M.J. 218 (C.M.A. 1991)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(3)(ii), the preceding section speaks to permissible direct assistance: The following activities . . . other actions that are undertaken primarily for a military or foreign affairs purpose. 32 C.F.R. § 213.10 . . . See 32 C.F.R. § 213.10(a)(2)(i). Those, however, are not the facts of this case. . . .

UNITED STATES v. YUNIS, a k a, 924 F.2d 1086 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(7) (1987). . . .

HAYES, v. HAWES F., 921 F.2d 100 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 213.10 specifically incorporates § 1385 and notes that it provides the primary restriction on military . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. THOMPSON, FR XXX- XX- XXXX, 30 M.J. 570 (A.F.C.M.R. 1990)

. . . Such other actions that are undertaken primarily for a military or foreign affairs purpose. 32 C.F.R. 213.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. YUNIS, 681 F. Supp. 891 (D.D.C. 1988)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(7). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GERENA,, 649 F. Supp. 1179 (D. Conn. 1986)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(7). . . . military in civilian law enforcement affairs. §§ 372 and 375, together with C.F.R. §§ 213.9(a) and 213.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HARTLEY, 796 F.2d 112 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 213.10(a)(3) (1985) (restricting such activity by military personnel). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DEL PRADO- MONTERO, UNITED STATES v. ARBOLEDA, UNITED STATES v. GARCIA, UNITED STATES v. LOBO, UNITED STATES v. HURTADO- MICOLTA, UNITED STATES v. GARCIA,, 740 F.2d 113 (1st Cir. 1984)

. . . Navy can be given permission to assist the Coast Guard in its law enforcement activities. 32 C.F.R. 213.10 . . .

SVEN SALEN AB v. JACQ. PIEROT, JR. SONS, INC., 559 F. Supp. 503 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . Weinstein, Korn & Miller, New York Civil Practice ¶ 213.10, at 2-240 (1981) (citing Ga Nun v. . . .

BOYD, v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 479 F. Supp. 846 (W.D. Va. 1978)

. . . The certificate reflected that plaintiff would receive future benefits of $213.10 in his own right and . . .

J. B. TAYLOR v. E. P. PERINI,, 413 F. Supp. 189 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . Two cumulative deposits from these sources made on December 12, 1975, and January 6, 1976, totalled $213.10 . . .