The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 213
STATE REVENUE LAWS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 213.50

213.50 Failure to comply; revocation of corporate charter or license to operate a public lodging establishment or public food service establishment; refusal to reinstate charter or license.—

(1) Any corporation of this state which has an outstanding tax warrant that has existed for more than 3 consecutive months is subject to the revocation of its charter as provided in s. 607.1420.

(2) A request for reinstatement of a corporate charter may not be granted by the Division of Corporations of the Department of State if an outstanding tax warrant has existed for that corporation for more than 3 consecutive months.

(3)(a) The Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation may suspend a license to operate a public lodging establishment or a public food service establishment if a tax warrant has been outstanding against the licenseholder for more than 3 months.

(b) The division may deny an application to renew a license to operate a public lodging establishment or a public food service establishment if a tax warrant has been outstanding against the licenseholder for more than 3 months.

History.—s. 23, ch. 92-320; s. 13, ch. 2010-138; s. 5, ch. 2010-166.

F.S. 213.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 213.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 213.50

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 213.50

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 213.50.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CORSINI, v. R. BLOOMBERG, 26 F. Supp. 3d 230 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Attempt to Commit the Crime of Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree, in violation of section 110/213.50 . . .

FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS BARNETT, 959 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 2007)

. . . and in favor of Geico for $3,547.37 in principal, $1,535.72 in prejudgment interest, and costs of $213.50 . . .

BANCAMERICA COMMERCIAL CORPORATION ASARCO v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., 900 F. Supp. 1427 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . $197.27 $156.43 $2,318.43 2/93 3/15/93 $1,933.00 $1,895.50 $0.00 $225.00 $1,670.50 86.42% $247.05 $213.50 . . .

ROLLINS, Jr. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, 71 F.R.D. 540 (E.D. La. 1976)

. . . Plaintiff’s finance charge was $213.50, entitling him to a maximum recovery of $427.00 if this suit was . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. A. KANTER,, 240 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1970)

. . . Execution is hereby directed to issue for the costs against respondent in the amount of $213.50. . . .

P. M. v., 40 T.C. 721 (T.C. 1963)

. . . In connection with this cruise, he also received travel pay of $213.50, the use of which has not been . . .

GARDNER- DENVER CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 75 F.2d 38 (7th Cir. 1935)

. . . Petitioner contends that the difference of $432,-213.50 should be deducted from its gross income for . . .

E. G. GOODING, 4 B.T.A. 389 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . The Commissioner has determined a deficiency in income taxes for the year 1917 in the. amount of $213.50 . . .

HARRY N. GIFFORD LOUIS W. CULLUM, 3 B.T.A. 334 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . Year ended March 31, 1914- 8,062.18 Year ended March 31, 1915- 430. 03 Year ended March 31, 1917--- 213.50 . . .

CLAY v. FREEMAN, 118 U.S. 97 (U.S. 1886)

. . . The latter will stand for their full amount, with interest, less the endorsement of $213.50 made by C . . .

TRECARTIN v. ROCHAMBEAU, 24 F. Cas. 164 (C.C.D. Me. 1865)

. . . John, and in gold and silver at the other places, and that they amounted in all to $213.50. . . .