Cases from cite.case.law:

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . the 75.31 total hours billed by two partners, the 49.87 hours billed by the special counsel, and the 215.18 . . .

M. McDERMOTT, v. MARCUS, ERRICO, EMMER BROOKS, P. C., 911 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Mass. 2012)

. . . 104 account thereby leaving a credit of $119.67 as of the end of 2004, which she applied against the $215.18 . . . unit 105 ($185.59) and the $225.94 to the outstanding November 2005 condominium fee for unit 104 ($215.18 . . . The condominium fees for each unit increased from $188.75 to $215.18 for unit 104 and from $155.04 to . . . It also included identical amounts for the condominium fee ($215.18), the condominium late fee ($25.00 . . . The $281.76 figure reflects the April condominium fee ($215.18), the April condominium late fee ($25.00 . . .

CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 832 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . §§ 215.8, 215.18. . . .

HEARTWOOD, INC. v. L. AGPAOA,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 675 (E.D. Ky. 2009)

. . . . § 215.18(b)(1), which provides as follows: Issue a written appeal decision within 45 days following . . . decision, either in whole or in part, and which may include instructions for further action. 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. R. KIMBELL, Ed, 595 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (D. Minn. 2009)

. . . . §§ 215.18, 215.2). . . .

EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE a a v. RUTHENBECK a D. C. No. a v. M., 490 F.3d 687 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 215.18(b)(1) is GRANTED. The opinion at Earth Island Institute v. . . . We do not decide whether the district court properly enjoined enforcement of 36 C.F.R. § 215.18(b)(1) . . . We REMAND the judgment and injunction with respect to the remaining regulations, except 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 . . .

EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a a a a v. PENGILLY, U. S. U. S., 376 F. Supp. 2d 994 (E.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . . § 215.18(b). Docket No. 70 at 17. . . . sooner than 46 days nor later -than 50 days following-the end of the appeal-filing périod. 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 . . . decision on which the appeal is based shall be deemed to be a final agency action ... ”), with 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 . . . appellant(s), the Appeal Reviewing Officer, and the Responsible Official within five days[.]” 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 . . . a) (permitting delegation of the determination that an emergency situation exists); and 36 C.F.R. § 215.18 . . .

BENSMAN, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 408 F.3d 945 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 215.18, and the regulation mandated that the Service “shall dismiss an appeal without review when . . . vice subsequently corrected this inconsistency by requiring the deciding officer to "either,'1 id. § 215.18 . . . (b) (2004), issue an appeal decision within 45 days, id. § 215.18(b)(1), or not issue an appeal determination . . . and notify the appellant that the challenged decision constitutes the agency's final action, id. § 215.18 . . .

In SAN JUAN DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL FIRE LITIGATION, 768 F. Supp. 912 (D.P.R. 1991)

. . . a total payment of one hundred six thousand, two hundred fifteen dollars and eighteen cents ($106,-215.18 . . .

HINKLE, v. CHRISTENSEN, a, 548 F. Supp. 630 (D.S.D. 1982)

. . . 517.89 Total Attorney’s Fees $10,307.89 Expenses Phone Calls 102.65 Mileage 162.00 Meals 111.59 Motel 215.18 . . .