The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 215.24

215.24 Exemptions where federal contributions or private grants.—

(1) Should any state fund be the recipient of federal contributions or private grants, either by the matching of state funds or by a general donation to state funds, and the payment of moneys into the General Revenue Fund under s. 215.20 should cause such fund to lose federal or private assistance, the Governor shall certify to the Chief Financial Officer that said income is for that reason exempt from the force and effect of s. 215.20.

(2) Should it be determined by the Governor that by reason of payments already made into the General Revenue Fund by any fund under this law, such fund is subject to the loss of federal or private assistance, then the Governor shall certify to the Chief Financial Officer that the income from such assistance is exempt from the provisions of this law, and the Chief Financial Officer shall thereupon refund and pay over to such fund any amount previously paid into the General Revenue Fund from such income.

History.—s. 6, ch. 20890, 1941; s. 5, ch. 61-493; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 77, ch. 90-132; s. 3, ch. 94-167; s. 204, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 215.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.24.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MRS. WALTER E. KALINOWSKI v. THE UNITED STATES, 151 Ct. Cl. 172 (Ct. Cl. 1960)

. . . Coral necklace.. 3.69 15.00 l, Pair earrings with two pearls, two large and six small diamonds_ 900 215.24 . . .

W. E. CALLAHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND PETERSON, SHIRLEY GUNTHER v. THE UNITED STATES, 91 Ct. Cl. 538 (Ct. Cl. 1940)

. . . Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of plaintiffs for $215.24. . . .